Reproduced from e-mail with ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
nineweaving, in which I sketched my initial reactions to Sherlock (2010) and then had the revelatory idea that if I posted them, I might get discussion with people who have also seen the first series (and/or find out that all my ideas about the characters are wrong). Probably I should rewrite it for less run-on, but right now I'm going to sleep. I've noticed a disheartening number of entries recently end this way.
( Of course he's not the boy's father! Look at the turn-ups on his jeans! )
It is a very male cast, which is canonical, but it seems there should be something to do about it that feels both in keeping with Conan Doyle and the twenty-first century. Eventually I will get to "A Scandal in Belgravia" and then I can join the Irene Adler argument, I suppose. She still shouldn't be the only one.
nineweaving, in which I sketched my initial reactions to Sherlock (2010) and then had the revelatory idea that if I posted them, I might get discussion with people who have also seen the first series (and/or find out that all my ideas about the characters are wrong). Probably I should rewrite it for less run-on, but right now I'm going to sleep. I've noticed a disheartening number of entries recently end this way.( Of course he's not the boy's father! Look at the turn-ups on his jeans! )
It is a very male cast, which is canonical, but it seems there should be something to do about it that feels both in keeping with Conan Doyle and the twenty-first century. Eventually I will get to "A Scandal in Belgravia" and then I can join the Irene Adler argument, I suppose. She still shouldn't be the only one.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}