sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
The funny thing about Detective Lieutenant Thomas J. Doyle of the NYPD is not that he was my undoubted introduction to Wendell Corey. The funny thing is that I didn't remember him for years. He should have been too weird to mislay.

To the child I was the first time I saw Rear Window (1954), he didn't look weird at all. He looked rational, which in my passionate identification with the terror and unfairness of not being believed I tuned out except as a stumbling block in the struggle of James Stewart's L. B. Jeffries to convince anyone with the slightest authority or even interest that murder had been committed one thunderous night across the courtyard of his summer-broiled block of Greenwich Village. Especially since his suspicions sat so well with the elegantly tenacious investigations of Grace Kelly's Lisa Fremont and the earthier opinions of Thelma Ritter's Stella, it never occurred to me that Jeff could be wrong—a stir-crazy shutterbug climbing with the heat wave into a fantasy as far-fetched as any of the globe-trotting adventures from which his plaster-cased leg has laid him up for six stultifying weeks. I was in the habit of taking narrators at their word. The relevance of Doyle was his failure to believe the hero, all the more infuriatingly because of the friendliness with which he appeared to hear out and then brush off each new hint of evidence. Whatever else he revealed about himself in the process of fulfilling his obstructive function did not stick with me.

As an adult, the first thing I can see about Doyle—beyond the Technicolor-saturated shock-blue of his eyes, so effective in low-lit scenes where they seem as luminous as Kelly's or Stewart's for that matter—is the deck stacked generically against him. Not only does he represent the law in a story of amateur detection, he's the conduit of sensible, skeptical objections in a film that started as one of the nightmare fictions of Cornell Woolrich, however wittily the screenplay by John Michael Hayes situates it within a snapshot of mid-century lives in New York. He's a sharp dresser, a second-nature kibitzer, and we understand him to have been a skilled reconnaissance pilot during WWII, but it would be a miracle of literary protocols were he to be right that the disappearance of one of the courtyard's residents is the result of a normal marital split rather than the kind which involves dismemberment. He's not a stopped clock, nonetheless. However sarcastically he explains it to Jeff, he's ethically as well as pragmatically right in refusing to search a citizen's apartment without a warrant in hopes of finding the evidence to justify one: "At the risk of sounding stuffy, I'd like to remind you of the Constitution . . . They'd throw the New York State Penal Code right in my face and it's six volumes." Challenged as to whether he can explain the mysterious movements of the murderer-elect, he retorts easily, "No; neither can you. That's a secret, private world you're looking into out there. People do a lot of things in private they couldn't possibly explain in public." On one of its numerous levels, as densely stratified as the infrastructure and architecture of the city it miniaturizes, the film turns on this question of whether Jeff has the right to breach the understood contract of urban living whereby neighbors exist cheek by jowl without getting into one another's business such as is constantly on display this very hot summer when everyone lives with their windows open and their shades up when not actually sleeping out on the fire escape, not alienated from one another like the myth of Kitty Genovese which seems to get its first airing in the accusations which follow the killing of a beloved small dog, but coexisting in the communal pretense of privacy from which Jeff shaving in his pajamas benefits as much as the dancer across the way who starts her exercises in the morning without putting her top on. To his mind, what he has seen through the windows of the Thorwald apartment entitles him to interfere; Doyle disagrees and the film really settles the question only with its second-story denouement in which all sorts of barriers real and imagined are broken, some literally and some ironically and some sweetly most of all. Until then, surely it must be baiting the audience when it reserves the possibility that the cynically experienced cop may have the truth of the situation, especially when he's such a horse's ass about it. "It'll wear off—along with the hallucinations."

Hitchcock prided himself on disconnecting audience sympathy from moral alignment and while Rear Window does not push the proposition as far as something like Psycho (1960) or Vertigo (1958) or even Notorious (1946), it's clever of the film to assign its most reasonable arguments to a character who is hardly a model of reason. However unreliable the photojournalist could turn out to be in his mix of neighborly obsession and nail-biting boredom, Doyle's even less the cool, disinterested observer than Jeff—breezily susceptible, conservatively stubborn, such an incorrigible wisenheimer that even a deserved and icy dismissal can't deter him from getting in the last word. His expert opinion entails a remarkable amount of hanging out at the expense of his old friend's liquor cabinet, occasionally losing the drift of the conversation to the terpsichorean scanties of "Miss Torso." His bland glance at an overnight case spilling over with peach-silky lingerie cogently underscores his point about private worlds, but a leapfrog of logic from Jeff nonplusses him into an incredible, Leo Rosten-ish "Hanh?" The night he intends to close the non-case of Lars Thorwald is a magnificent exposition of failing to read the room with needless cracks about feminine intuition and too obvious an impatience with armchair sleuths until the audience in solidarity with Jeff and Lisa hardens against his entirely plausible interpretation of events. He looks like a sophisticate in his summer suits and his cavalier gesture of trying to toss back a snifter of brandy like a shot leaves him mopping it off his lapels with a self-conscious grin that finds no more purchase on his unamused audience than his genial condescension of the moment before. However Corey landed the role—he had demonstrated a convincing rapport with Stewart in the otherwise inert Carbine Williams (1952)—it could have been tailored to his quick, wry, fallible repertoire, right down to the part where even after Doyle comes through in the crunch, only the authenticity of his concern for a man he's spent most of his screentime gently deriding keeps him from looking like a complete bozo. Jeff, of course, has his own amends to make for failing to see what's in front of him whether through the safely cropped distance of a telephoto lens or his own assumption-blinkered eyes: "Boy, you should've seen her!" Heroically in heels on the fire escape, flashing another woman's ring like a high sign behind her back, Lisa I remembered seeing. Jeff I remembered, too, across the decades he and his story took to come into focus. Doyle, frankly, fucks up so hard, I don't know what my excuse was.

If family memory can be trusted, I really did see Rear Window for the first time following its spoof on Square One TV (1987–92) as Mathnet's "A View from the Rear Terrace" (1988). I rewatched it courtesy of the Minuteman Library Network, but on account of being one of its director's most famous and well-loved productions, it is readily available wherever movies are sold, streamed, or pirated. Happy birthday, Wendell Corey, one hundred and ten years ago. Being forgotten from a formative age feels unfair to every single one of your characters I have met. I'm still yelling at the next dry stone wall I see in the Pioneer Valley on your account. This hallucination brought to you by my secret backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Claude Rains)
I don't know that I would call Stephen Fisher my favorite Hitchcock villain, but he has lingered with and troubled me for years, which makes him worth the contemplation.

On one level, he may be nothing more than a side effect of the shifting conditions of Foreign Correspondent (1940). Produced just as the phony war was turning into the real thing, the film undergoes a corresponding transformation over the course of its runtime from a pre-war light thriller in its director's own tradition to an urgent piece of up-to-the-minute propaganda as blunt as a broken fourth wall—thirty-nine steps to London after dark in two genre-jolting hours. The farther the eve of war ticks down to midnight, the more clearly the reality of Germany emerges from the Ruritanian static of Borovia, the MacGuffin of Clause 27 falls by the wayside of the headlines of September 1, 1939. As the seat-of-the-pants screwball of jungled umbrellas and prevailing windmills levels out into the cat-and-mouse of classically amateur espionage, the dialogue begins to admit the existence of blackouts and bomb shelters in London. So perhaps does Fisher clarify from an urbanely professional traitor to a deep-cover patriot, one more mask peeled off the depths to which we must recognize the enemy will keep sinking. His Universal Peace Party isn't merely a well-veneered campaign for appeasement, it's a front for strong-arm tactics as brutal as they are surreal, blasting a drugged and kidnapped man with photoflood lighting and big-band jazz. The crudity of personally arranging a murder dismays him as much as the necessity of participating in an interrogation and he sets to it as smoothly as he addresses the audiences who really believe in his conscientious objections. The warning he imparts to the American reporter unwittingly on his trail would give him away to anyone with an ear for double-speaking when he characterizes the hijackers of a prominent anti-fascist statesman as "cunning, unscrupulous—and inspired," but even his daughter who finally comes to suspect him of treason doesn't go so far as to imagine that he might never have owed his allegiance to the country they have lived in all her life. "I've just been worried," she confesses aboard the America-bound clipper they boarded narrowly ahead of the official declaration of war, "but I believed in you." Quick as if it hurts him, her father shakes his head: "You shouldn't."

A Hitchcock veteran if not a regular, Herbert Marshall had starred for the director as a conscience-stricken juror turned amateur detective in Murder! (1930) and lost none of his gentlemanly attraction over the intervening decade even as he eased out of the romance of a leading man; it puts his Fisher at first in a class with Professor Jordan of The 39 Steps (1935) or Phillip Vandamm of North by Northwest (1959), well-mannered, well-respected, well-connected men for whom the business of treason may require certain sacrifices at second hand but never compromise itself with such interference as personal feeling. Well after we've seen his duplicity in action, he remains courteous, humorous, never so controlled that he looks untouchable. His distaste for the harsher aspects of his work may be nothing more than squeamishness when he's willing to let other men bloody their hands with them. His reluctance to involve his daughter in his subversive activities does suggest more conscience than self-preservation when his right-hand man notes the additional difficulties of working around her, but even as he realizes she loves the man he's just sent off to meet with an unfortunate accident, he restrains himself from calling off the hit. Beyond the dramatic shock value and the careless-talk paranoia of wartime, it never made any sense to me that he should turn out to be ethnically German. Nothing about the mechanics of the plot would alter if Fisher were exactly what he seemed from the revelation of his perfidy, a well-bred Englishman whose Nazi sympathies have made it worth his while to promote a disingenuous pacifism while working with foreign agents to help them obtain "a piece of information that would be very valuable to the enemy in the war that breaks out tomorrow, weather permitting." All the twist adds is a dash of xenophobia and a strange complexity which there is barely time left to explore before the flying boat hits the water and the film its entreating epilogue. What I had missed was the previous war's phenomenon of spy fever as recently discussed by [personal profile] philomytha—the specter of German sleeper agents seeded throughout Britain in the most innocuous and naturalized guises which consumed not only popular literature but civilian imagination and official decisions as the country hurtled into World War I. It had not occurred to me that Foreign Correspondent could have been produced so near the outbreak of hostilities proper that it would draw more on the tropes of the older war because the newer ones had not yet been established. If it were still gearing up to the latest in propaganda, however, it would account for the otherwise curious sympathy the film extends to its not even honorable enemy with a generosity reminiscent of erstwhile war pictures as recent as Powell and Pressburger's The Spy in Black (1939) and unthinkable by the time Hitchcock returned to World War II with Saboteur (1942), whose Nazi agents really are the home-grown fifth columnists that Fisher only resembles. There's no percentage in it, nationalistically speaking. But there is a remarkable pain in the speech he makes to the daughter he loves more than anything else in his double life, the last illusions of which he is forced to disabuse her before they leave the charmed space of the air and the justice of the war-kindled earth catches up to him:

"Carol, I've got to talk to you. I don't want to, but I've got to. It's the hardest part of the whole thing, talking to you now. I don't mind about the rest, really . . . I'm to be arrested when we land. As a spy. Shipped back to London. That's quite all right, except just the one phase of it—you. That's why I've got to talk to you. I should like you to think of me a little from my own point of view. It might help you, afterwards. First about yourself, my deceiving you. I had to, you know, I didn't want you involved in any part of it because you're English—half English, anyway—I'm not, I'm just coated with an English accent. It's a very thin coat. I've fought for my country in my heart in a very difficult way because sometimes it's harder to fight dishonorably than nobly in the open. And I've used my country's methods because I was born with them. I don't intend making this sort of plea to the court-martial. I'm making it only to my daughter whom I've loved dearly and before whom I feel a little ashamed."

It is not an absolution. Even allowing for how much the divers hands of the screenplay would not have known about Nazism in 1940, Fisher remains off north of the moral compass by the sheer fact that whatever he may have done to his discredit, what he's sorriest about is the hurt he's caused his daughter by getting caught. Even so, just the way his sure-footed public speaker's voice suddenly stutters, stumbles as if in spite of itself into lines like a very thin coat suggests some more troubled history of assimilation and alienation than mere loyalty of blood and soil, neither the dispassionate mastermind nor the fanatical dupe; it takes him out of archetype and into his own unanswerable and problematic self without which he could not be let out of the film heroically, for his daughter to find strength in his memory even as she agrees to the publication of his crimes. "My father fought for his country his way. It wasn't a straight way, but it was a hard way. And I've got to fight for my country—the hard way." On the other side of the war, this figure of the Nazi's daughter will become the much more compromised heroine of Notorious (1946), shape-shifting herself to make up for her father's shame. Here at its beginning, he can still be saluted as much as watched out for, the enemy who is so very like ourselves.

Because the film changed so often in production as world-historical events around it did the same, I cannot tell without research if Fisher was always intended to take the shape he did, but the net result is that for all the vivid, often dream-logical images with which Foreign Correspondent supplies its viewer, from a lethal camera-flash to a rice-paper shatter of sea, the only character who holds up comparably in my memory is George Sanders' Scott ffolliott, the amiably ambiguous co-lead who can explicate the niceties of Tudor decapitalization during a car chase, essay an improvisation in counterterrorism as if he's filing copy, and launch himself out of a hotel window into an awning full of rain with the same aplomb with which he leaves instructions to cancel his rhumba lesson, none of which protects him from fear or embarrassment or danger of his life. It fits him into the chiaroscuro, off-kilter and no joke. The weird little not so lesser light that is Foreign Correspondent would be even stronger if the same could be said of Joel McCrea's Johnny Jones or Laraine Day's Carol Fisher. Their blatantly allegorical endgame is a mutual awakening from the sidelines of their innocence in order to exchange it for a common responsibility—fighting Nazis—but however sincerely they speedrun a romance or broadcast while the bombs fall, they never really pick up the ambivalence in which their shared ally thrives as much as their poignant antagonist, the signature of their split, startling world. If it was an accident of history, so much the better. It ends up feeling like the most real thing. Perhaps I return to Fisher simply because I can't explain him, as in life he never tried to explain himself. "Thanks," he dryly acknowledges a refusal to condemn him totally, seconds from the irony of enemy action that will overturn the state of play once again. "It's a minority report, but very welcome." This coat brought to you by my hard backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Sovay: David Owen)
It really is not true of all the shorts I see, but I wish Channel Incident (1940) were a feature film. At nine and a half minutes, it has little time for more than a tableau of the Dunkirk evacuation, but its twist on national heroism so folklorically anticipates more inclusive revisions that the Ministry of Information should have put some other propaganda in the five-minute weekly free slot and let Two Cities or Ealing have a crack at the human interest.

The phlegmatically anonymous title gives no hint that its plot is the stuff of broadside ballads: when the all-hands call comes in from the Admiralty, the heroine wiping the engine grease off her hands sees no sense in turning over the motor yacht registered in her husband's name when she might take it out herself in hopes of finding him among the stranded soldiers of the British Expeditionary Force. "But you know what it's for, don't you, miss?" she's warned anxiously. "I mean, they won't let a woman." Her reply is confident as conspiracy: "They needn't know." She has a young lion's face; in trousers and a man's loose oilskin, her brown curls packed beneath a knit balaclava and a tin hat and her voice clipped low for the naval officer on the docks at Ramsgate, she looks like many a woman who went to war before her, a credible boy. She doesn't pass so well that the soldier who offered the services of his Bren gun isn't shortly rapping on her helmet with a mock-reproving "Here, does your mother know you're out?" but he settles down with a grin when she coolly replies in the middle of the night and the Channel, "Does the sergeant-major know you're here?" She holds her course under the whines and crashes of bombing and strafing runs, hauls the jetsam weight of men from the debris of swimming-deep water, calls to each new cargo of evacuees that she ferries to the minesweepers and naval trawlers standing out past the shallows of the beaches, "Any of you seen Number Three Company, 4th Division, REs?" Time and again the answer is no; she turns back toward the lines of wading, waiting men.

Even without the title card of the MOI, the film would never be accused of disguising its propaganda. Peggy Ashcroft is playing such an Everywoman that her never-named protagonist is actually credited as "She," rather in the same way that the Wanderer is tied up at the jetty of the helpfully archetypal "North Island Sailing Club." Since the National Service Act 1941 has not yet made women liable to conscription into the auxiliary services such as the ATS, the WRNS, or the WAAF, her patriotism is domestically inflected, signaled by her wistful fingering of the pipe which is her missing man's sigil and then spelled out as she steers through the salt-spray night: "You mean the real skipper? He's over there, Johnnie. We're going to fetch him back." As the relentless work of the evacuation wears on without a familiar face among the rounds of wounded and waterlogged men, she begins to ask herself dizzily, "Where is he? Oh, God, where is he?" Could the Bechdel–Wallace test have been introduced to cinema-going lesbians of the Blitz era, they would have agreed en masse that Channel Incident fails it like a shot. Even so, its can-do spirit means it wastes no time on special pleading for its heroine's competence and initiative, which are taken as read by the men she de facto commands for her share of Operation Dynamo. Gordon Harker's Ferris and Kenneth Griffith's Johnnie may be respectively too old and too young for military service and therefore suitable for relegation to the blurring lines of women's work, but Robert Newton's Tanner is able-bodied and in uniform and cheerfully affirms their positions with that first night's "Okay, skipper!" None of the men she drives herself to exhaustion rescuing seem to find anything strange about a woman lending them a hand over the gunwales, not even the joker who remonstrates with the sailor who throws him a boat hook, "Who do you think you are, Bo bloody Peep?" Most importantly, the collective miracle of the little ships keeps her heroism from revolving entirely around her husband. She hasn't failed when she finds him ashore in England, a wounded man carefully unloaded from a destroyer with a cigarette between his fingers even as he's rolled up to the ambulance. Some strangers with a motor launch or a barge or a fishing smack helped him to safety, just as she relayed her own strangers home. In different places, they were still in it together. "Well, here I am."

Channel Incident was produced and directed by Anthony Asquith in September 1940, his first foray into the subject matter of war that would furnish as wide a range of films as the espionage quirks of Cottage to Let (1941) or the well-made attrition of The Way to the Stars (1945); it was written by Dallas Bower and Lewis Anselm da Costa Ritchie under his naval pen name of Bartimeus and may eschew almost all of the popular myths of Dunkirk. The photography by Bernard Knowles is documentary-style on a budget—tight and close on the characters so that if the water isn't open, the audience'll never know—and the interpolation of historical footage allows the smoke-billowed beaches of Dunkirk and their straggling soldiers in long shot to play themselves, a trick repeated at the end of the film to intercut Ashcroft at the end of her hope among the tired, daylit troops disembarking onto British soil at last. Perhaps at feature length it would have slackened if not sufficiently built out from its field-stripped premise, but as a one-reeler it's so compact that it feels spring-loaded. I shall fantasize that it might have been directed by Leslie Howard, who co-directed my beloved Pygmalion (1938) with Asquith and demonstrated his respect for the wartime heroism of women with The Gentle Sex (1943), itself originally conceived by Moie Charles as a short documentary for the MOI. In the universe of films we actually got, I'd pair the two as short and feature, or just yield to the obvious and screen this one before Dunkirk (1958). It can be viewed on its own thanks to the digitization efforts of the Imperial War Museum. I cannot but imagine it was on the radar of Lissa Evans when writing Their Finest Hour and a Half (2009). It is apparently the case that Winston Churchill really liked it. This company brought to you by my looking backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Sydney Carton)
On the one hand, I have read too much science fiction to be the ideal audience for "Man on a Mountaintop" (1961). Even before I get around to picking at the entanglement of gifted children and anti-intellectualism and human loneliness and abusive parenting that comprises this ambitious, unwieldy teleplay written by Robert Alan Aurthur and directed by Tom Donovan for The United States Steel Hour (1953–63), I want to fight it on its own ground of the literature that supplies the allusion of its title. Once a nationally famous child prodigy tenure-tracked before he could buy his own drinks, Horace Mann Borden (Cliff Robertson) at the age of thirty-one busses tables at an all-night cafeteria in Greenwich Village and doesn't crack a wince when baited to perform his savant's calculations for a fifty-cent contemptuous tip; he gets away as often as he can to the movies, returning to sleep in his rented room furnished with secondhand stills of old movie stars and the three books of his total library. He is obsessed with Philip Wylie's Gladiator (1930), seeing in the tragically misfit end of its artificially created superman his own doom since childhood. He meets no one who can challenge him to see himself instead in the super-intelligent community of Wilmar Shiras' Children of the Atom (1953). He calls himself a freak and a monster for graduating summa cum laude at twelve with an honor thesis in theoretical physics which he defended before the combined faculties of Harvard and MIT and despite reading voraciously enough to imprint on Wylie, never seems to have run across A. E. van Vogt's Slan (1946). Of course no one within the walls of the script will have handed him a stack of Zenna Henderson because the entire premise rests on how nihilistically isolated Borden has become from himself in the course of fleeing other people, but how could he not have known a single person in his formerly high-flying intellectual life who could have accurately informed him that he may be damaged, but he's not—for God's sake, especially in his field—that weird? His flat affect and avoidance of eye contact and jerkily uninflected voice may conventionally indicate the alienation of his intelligence or realistically reflect a childhood spent as a prop for his father's theories of pedagogy, an adulthood salt-smarting conscious of every discomfort his differences provoke. As much for his own reinforcement as to warn off the sympathy he can feel coming from his newest neighbor, he repeats, "A freak and a monster cannot live in this world of normal people." Corn-fresh from Iowa by way of an aborted summer in Europe, Gerta Blake (Salome Jens) is not equipped to argue with Borden's self-presentation of irredeemable strangeness; her ability to make her way into a friendship with him is founded on the determination of naïveté, her unconditionally offered support which she eventually names as love. She is a normal person, she wasn't reading by the age of four; her solution to the bitterness with which he describes himself as a machine because he understands the formula for mass–energy equivalence but not the meaning of the words I love you is to let him, like a fairy tale, kiss her. It is so far from a solution for a man directed by nature and nurture to look for the one correct answer to a problem that it winds him right up into a meltdown. It couldn't have to hurt to try him on Theodore Sturgeon first.

On the other, out of eviscerating nowhere at the midpoint of the episode comes the monologue in which Borden reveals the reason that six years ago he quit academia to haunt the local movie houses and duck his neighbors in the hall and make no use of the formidable intelligence for which he was so strictly valued:

"Yes, I was a teacher. At nineteen, I was an associate professor. And all that time, I had the feeling that everybody was looking and waiting, waiting, waiting. All right, prodigy, produce. All right, genius, produce. Produce the evidence that will prove Einstein is wrong. Produce the theory that will change the world. They were like children at my feet, waiting for me to hand them down the ABCs that would rock their very existence, but I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it. I could never do it, because I don't know enough and I'll never know enough. There's so much, so very much to know and I could never know enough . . . I used to walk the halls of that university, afraid to face people to whom I was becoming a failure. I hid behind the door in my office, hating the thought of seeing my students and the other members of the faculty to whom each day was another day of disappointment, another day in which I did not produce. And one day, I said, enough! I will live where are no mirrors, where I—where I won't even have to face myself. I will live alone, where I will disappoint no one. It's simple, satisfying, and I'm happy this way."

Oh, Borden. Wittgenstein at that age ran as far as the Russian front trying to drop out of his own head. It didn't work for him, either.

What right has this speech to ring true as pain when so much of the rest of the episode is full of stock sentiments about smart people in a stupid world? None of them are straw men, but most of its characters are fleshed out only as far as their arguments, their hostile or possessive or amiable misconstructions of Borden who holds the gravity of the play like a dark star in his separateness from them which may not be anything as mythical as he's built it up to be. His estranged father (Paul McGrath) is a sort of snake-oil cartoon of B. F. Skinner, an obscure psychologist who made his name exploiting his brilliant child as if its achievements were his own invention and still maintains with proprietary frustration that his new Einstein owes the world his gifts no matter the cost to himself. Bohemian Charlie Blake (Chris Wiggins) inclines toward a protective animosity when his little sister starts bringing their "real flip" of a reclusive neighbor home like a stray cat and only an insightful, unexpected comment on his avant-garde paintings checks him into a second look at this blunt dark-haired man in busboy's shirtsleeves, for once feeling safe enough to venture an opinion that might make him visible. Gerta is steadfast throughout, but the most telling show of support may actually come from Willie Bliss (Gene Saks), the brash off-Broadway actor who surprises everyone within earshot by apologizing to Borden for bullying him like the class clown with the bookworm, even if he has to broach the subject with typical theatricality: "Why, do I have to say why? Isn't it enough I want to apologize? I'm stupid . . . Sometimes when you're stupid, you're afraid of people who aren't." It does not please Gerta that they team up to entertain her party with a quiz kid act: she runs from the room in tears, leaving Borden mystified. The speech rings true because he does, even in ways I can't tell if his author intended. Even granting his definition of happiness as the avoidance of pain, the most encouraging thing that can be said for Borden when we meet him is that he has a stable routine. His reputation in the building is half creep, half punch line; the combination should make him disappointment-proof, but he shies off at the first threat of contact as if a civil word might unacceptably raise hopes. It isn't funny that he drops his newest armful of old Hollywood in his haste to get out of sight. His social overloads are brief and distressing, glitchier than his usual conversations with his throat working against the lockjaw of listener's expectations, the staccato key-clack of his sentences so invariable that hearing it lighten with uncertain pleasure at the end of a quiet evening strikes like a revelation. He can hold down a job on the night shift and lose himself in the silver screen. His diffident offer to Gerta of some pictures from his collection of William Holden is the bravest move he's made in years. It's a crystalline performance by Robertson, coming so soon after his first run at flowers and Algernon in The United States Steel Hour's "The Two Worlds of Charlie Gordon" (1961) that it is impossible for me not to wonder if he was typed slightly as an exponent of neuroatypicality, but Borden himself doesn't feel like a type. Genius is a tough act to put over and he does it without fanfare or equations, the seal on his intelligence not that it comes bundled with weirdness and trauma, but that devastating articulation of the flipside of Dunning–Kruger: the knowledge of how much he doesn't know. "Somewhere the cogs didn't mesh." It should not be lost on viewers sensitive to depictions of giftedness that the play, like Borden, ultimately blows off the big question of whether he will accept or decline the new offer of a teaching position at Columbia; it's irrelevant. It's not his route back to himself, or on to the self he was never allowed to be. "I'm a machine built without love," he tries to make real to the parent still bent on seeing him in terms of his potential, unwilling or unable to acknowledge that for all his eidetic memory and precocious mathematics the prodigy was a person instead of a paradigm shift in waiting. "Didn't you know that, Father? Didn't you know if you failed that I would be a freak? Didn't you know that? When you build a machine and it fails, you throw it away. What do you do with a man? What do you do with a man?"

I have less in common with Borden than makes a neat sign-off. I was reading by the age of four and designed my own octal system after reading about Maya numerals around the age of nine and was regularly challenged to recite verbatim passages from books that classmates refused to believe I was reading at my usual speed and would jerk out of my hands just to make sure, but I also had a talking doctor and the luck of a pair of parents who cared more about my resilience than my potential, which doesn't mean I can't understand a character who finds it easier to imagine their own death by lightning than a life that isn't seen as a disappointment. It gets me over the jostling rather than melding of themes in "Man on a Mountaintop" and helps a little with the construction of its female lead as a normalizing force of love. Borden is drawn with sufficient reality that even a healthier version of him would be hard to picture as particularly normal, except in the ways that it is completely normal to make only so much eye contact and watch a heck of a lot of movies and look in science fiction for ways to understand your life. When it gets into print, I'd give him Le Guin's "Nine Lives" (1968): Will he be different from me? Yes, that he will. There's the terrible thing: the strangeness of the stranger. However familiar some of the strangeness may be. Enjoy the preview of the Space Needle during the commercial breaks. This flip brought to you by my real backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Rotwang)
What an age of ephemera we live in when I can watch a post-WWII U.S. Army training film about venereal disease just because the medical officer who has to deliver the bad news is played by Wendell Corey.

Easy to Get (1947) was never intended for my eyes. Its production by the Army Pictorial Service explicitly restricted its audience to the servicemen at home and abroad whose adult education was necessarily exempt from the squeamish blinders of the Production Code which deemed the mere mention of condoms as taboo as full-frontal footage of uncut schlong, a serious impediment to a campaign of prevention and control whose even mixed messages needed not to be mealy-mouthed. Right down to the ominous entendre of its title, the 22-minute film follows the wartime playbook for sex hygiene as it dramatizes the communicable woes of a couple of representative GIs whose best-laid good times gang aft gonorrhea and syphilis. Clean-cut Corporal Baker gets the disenchantment of his life when it turns out the small-town sweetheart he met at the soda counter of a drugstore left him with more than memories, but even streetwise Private Anderson doesn't realize how much more than two bucks it'll cost him when he springs for another round in the sack instead of a post-coital stop at the nearest prophylactic station. Each of their predicaments occasions some interrogation by the medical officer who leaves the impression that he'd love to treat a sore throat for a change, but the real catechism comes from the narrator whose man-to-man omniscient razzing escalates from the clinical threats of gonococcal arthritis and syphilitic aortitis to the triple-distilled horror of what happens to a soldier's meat when he decides that rubbers are for sissies and whiskey's just as good a first-line agent as sulfathiazole and calomel. "Maybe you don't want to stay healthy and keep yourself clean," he dares his audience as the camera pans across a ward of shots of penicillin in the ass; the chancred money shot is yet to come. "Maybe you want to hop in bed with one girl after another. Well, maybe you'd like to hop into the same boat with these men!" It should go without saying that some tolerance for various conditions of dick is required by this film, but its anatomical correctness is actually most interesting when it eases off the scare tactics in favor of matter-of-fact tutorials in the antibacterial protocols of the pro station and its personally packaged equivalent of the pro-kit as a simple, sensible precaution after the fact. Protection is encouraged with similar frankness; the average soldier is assumed to know how to roll on a condom and it is fascinating to hear the assurance a full four decades pre-AIDS that a partner who won't have sex safely isn't worth having it with. The insistence on abstinence as the only surefire prophylaxis, however, dilutes this refreshing pragmatism and shrink-wraps it in misogyny when it relies on characterizing every woman as a potential fireship. "Doesn't matter if she's a high school girl or a juke joint girl—inside her there may be sores full of crawling little germs." Only for purposes of a grotesque vignette about congenital syphilis does the film admit the danger of infectious men; otherwise the identification of women with mortal corruption goes as hard as a Rops etching. A honky-tonk singer leans invitingly at her piano, spirochetes wriggle on a slide, a pair of streetwalkers bait their smiles into the dark. Not even public health could push the Army to acknowledge the presence of men who have sex with men in its ranks, but each time the narrator heterosexually thunders, "And you catch it only one way—from a woman," the more queerly minded viewer may worry about the soldiers who took the apparent obvious loophole to heart.

All these techniques of practical instruction and moral admonition can be found in the wartime literature of posters, pamphlets, and even previous productions of the U.S. Army Signal Corps. What sets Easy to Get in a class of its own is its Blackness. Released in the last year before the formal integration of America's armed forces, its setting of an all-Black unit tacitly illustrates the segregated conditions under which it was made to appeal specifically to Black servicemen for whom the default white archive of training films did not hold the same authority and at the same time offers a kind of accidentally unmarked sketch thanks to the everyman dictates of its genre by which its unfortunate GIs are no hornier, more reckless, or more ill-informed than their white counterparts who lost furloughs or missions of their own to VD. Whoever plays Corporal Baker—uncredited as usual for training films, but in his case I would welcome any pointers, since I do not recognize the actor and have found no external information to clue me in—his ten days of deep talks and movies and moonlit trysts with dream girl Ruby Dee are so achingly romantic, the least he owes her is a notification of exposure. However ironically it ends in line at the dispensary, the joint where Russell Evans' Private Anderson picks up the prostitute played with challenging smolder by Muriel Smith is authentically hot, jumping with fast-footed swing that couldn't more blatantly stand in for the jazz going on upstairs. With minimal exceptions such as Corey's medical officer or the solid citizen who keels over from tertiary complications at the luncheonette, the barracks, battlefields, bedsides and streets of the film's location-spiced sets are populated by Black officers, enlisted men, and civilians alike. It blurs the docudrama a little, as the intended audience might well be stationed in Allied-occupied Germany or Japan where the red-light districts wouldn't look so much like Philly or Detroit, but it recalls the world of race films, in which white characters could be peripheral if they existed at all. Joseph M. Newman's direction is on brand for his later, socially conscious noirs like Abandoned (1949), but I would love to know the authorship of the narrator who sounds like the sarcastically disembodied, unracialized know-it-all of so many educational films and yet introduces his final speaker with the curious, unmistakable, "Mr. Robeson has done as much good for our people as any man alive." It seals a tone that has been shifting steadily toward a quite marked state. Post-war, Easy to Get transposes the patriotic exhortation not to let down the Allied effort by catching a sexually transmitted infection—the posters in particular are remarkably blunt about representing cases of VD as victories for the Axis—into the language of racial uplift, invoking the heroism of Black American men against Nazi ideals through footage of Joe Louis demolishing Max Schmeling in 1938, Jesse Owens and Cornelius Johnson and John Woodruff racking up gold after gold at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin. "Metcalfe sent the stars and stripes up above the swastika and the rising sun so often that Hitler and Hirohito should have taken the hint right there and quit." In fact, Lieutenant Ralph Metcalfe himself shows up to corroborate the value of physical as well as mental fitness, paving the way for the God-level cameo of Paul Robeson, not yet blacklisted and titanically political. "None of us will forget what we've learned from this movie," the voice of Othello, Ol' Man River, the Harlem Renaissance concludes, "but more important, let's not forget our responsibility to our communities, our families, and ourselves." Whatever the film's other omissions and hedges, for just a moment it seems much less conservative calling on Black pride rather than generalized nationalism; the enemy is more than VD, America the theater of war. Robeson had just headlined the American Crusade Against Lynching because the President of the United States was dragging his feet on civil rights. It sends the film out on a note of conviction that his call to public health sounds anything but respectable or trite.

Should you decide to check out this core sample of post-war sexual and racial attitudes for yourself, I cannot stress its not-safe-for-work-ness enough: one minute it's describing the ravages of neurosyphilis, then it's debunking myths of treatment and transmission, the next minute it's just cock. The combined effect can be watched on YouTube if you're willing to confirm your age and at the National Library of Medicine if you'd rather not bother. In trying to unearth more detail on its production, I turned up the puzzling record of an American medical officer stationed in Bad Nauheim referring to an "'Easy to Get'—VD Training Film (New)" in a letter dated February 1946, which does not at all accord with Corey only leaving for Hollywood in the summer of that year, having spent the previous six months co-starring on Broadway in Dream Girl. I may have to poke at the National Archives. He is extremely recognizable even glumly getting up from his microscope to tell a soldier who thought he had the most wonderful furlough, "You've got gonorrhea, Baker." This strain brought to you by my healthy backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Default)
This year. I can't even summarize it: sickness, stress, poverty, my short-term disability leave consumed by further illness instead of recuperation, crisis of beloved cat. I maintained my website and my presence on AO3 and wrote some new things including my first original fiction since 2020 and was very, very tired.

I published no new fiction this year. I had one very important reprint:

"As the Tide Came Flowing In" in Adventures in Bodily Autonomy: Exploring Reproductive Rights in Science Fiction, Fantasy, & Horror (ed. Raven Belasco), Aqueduct Press, October 2023.

There were some new poems:

"The Credo of Loplop" in Uncanny Magazine #50, January 2023.
"Exposure" in Not One of Us #73, January 2023.
"Drained" in Not One of Us #74, March 2023.
"I Have a Sister Beyond the Sea" in Not One of Us #75, June 2023.
"The Green Room" in Not One of Us #76, September 2023.
"Scarcity Economics" in Not One of Us #77, December 2023.

No fanfiction that made it as far as AO3, since I decided in April that discretion was the better part of sadfic, but I will count the ghost poem I wrote for Johnny Ryan at such time as it sees print.

In past years, I never included my editing work for Strange Horizons or The Deadlands because they were other people's publications, but my name is on the cover of this volume:

The Deadlands: Year One (eds. E. Catherine Tobler, Sonya Taaffe, David Gilmore), Psychopomp Books, December 2023.

I wrote so much less than I had wanted for Patreon, but at least about some films it mattered for me to do so:

Night into Morning (1951), January 2023.
The Flying Scotsman (1929), January 2023.
Learn and Live (1943), January 2023.
Ministry of Fear (1944), January 2023.
The Wild North (1952), February 2023.
Black Kitten 'Thon 2023 [Mad Love (1935), The Day the Earth Caught Fire (1961), Time Out for Trouble (1961), "The Last Day" (1989), Time Piece (1965), The Hidden (1987), The Sounds of Science (2002), Neptune Frost (2021)], February 2023.
Hunt the Man Down (1951), March 2023.
Any Number Can Play (1949), March 2023.
Julius Caesar (1953), March 2023.
The Unfaithful (1947), March 2023.
Nude on the Moon (1961), March 2023.
The Accused (1949), April 2023.
"Sign of the Zodiac" (The Barbara Stanwyck Show, 1961), April 2023.
Something Always Happens (1934) and Crown v. Stevens (1936) , April 2023.
I Walk Alone (1947), April 2023.
The Capture (1950), May 2023.
The Fastest Gun Alive (1956), May 2023.
The File on Thelma Jordon (1950), May 2023.
1917 (2019), June 2023.
Holiday Affair (1949), June 2023.
Dial 1119 (1950), June 2023.
The Furies (1950), June 2023.
revisiting Too Late for Tears (1949), July 2023.
The Hitch-Hiker (1953), July 2023.
The Woman on Pier 13 (1949), August 2023.
The Well (1951), August 2023.
Inferno (1953), August 2023.
Lightning Strikes Twice (1934), September 2023.
The Lighthouse (2019), September 2023.
Doctor Who: The Greatest Show in the Galaxy (1988), October 2023.
Dark City (1950), October 2023.
Harriet Craig (1950), October 2023.
The Killer Is Loose (1956), November 2023.
Desert Fury (1947), November 2023.
on film editing and Elisha Cook Jr.'s hands [Born to Kill (1947)], November 2023.
They All Come Out (1939), November 2023.
Men (2022), December 2023.
Suicide by Sunlight (2019), December 2023.

For once, could the coming year actually be better? It will have to be enough that at the end of this one, we are all still here. Happy New Year. A healthy new year. Af tselokhes.
sovay: (Renfield)
I have the same problem with Nikyatu Jusu's Suicide by Sunlight (2019) as I do with certain novellas, namely that I want the full novel, or in this case the feature. With their seventeen minutes of short film, director Jusu and co-writer Robin Shanea Williams more than sketch a New York City a half-step of science and folklore from our own, where Black vampires afforded the sunscreen of their melanin may more successfully pass for human than their night-confined white counterparts, a neat flip of privilege which plays perceptively with the advantages and marginalizations faced by the day-walking Valentina (Natalie Paul) as she navigates her professional obligations as a nurse on a children's cancer ward and her personal desperation as the mother of twin daughters withheld by their all too fearfully human father in a snapshot that feels as deep as a grimoire. The time we spend with her is tender and carnal, vulnerable and intimidating, intensely—as it should be, with all the blood in it—alive.

Part of the film's richness is the fluidity of its vampirism, which is not treated as a stand-in for real-world difference so much as just another axis to intersect with. From the introductory vox pop playing on a hospital TV, we can tell that old-fashioned human racism hasn't died with the revelation of vampires because the white anchor interrupts the Black NYU professor who has just been trying to clarify how few of these hidden day-walkers are killers of any kind, "I'm sorry to cut you off there, but I just have to ask—if we're talking African-American vampires, then what's going on with the white ones?" Some kind of class tension cuts between Valentina and her ex as she hisses down her side of a freeze-out phone call, "You know, I can get gutter if that's what you want to see. Dirtier than you ever imagined." Langston (Motell Foster) wears a camel-hair topcoat, hustles their wide-eyed daughters up the steps of a Brooklyn brownstone and slams the door so hard in his camo-jacketed ex-wife's face that we understand the old rules of invitation still apply beyond the practical impediments of keys and locks. "If you don't control yourself," he rebuffs her pleading as coldly as a husband out of Ibsen or Highsmith, "you'll never see them again. I swear to God, everybody will know." From the glass-rattling more-than-mortal force with which Valentina lashes back, "Everybody will know what?" we understand him to mean the exposure of her vampirism, consequences unknown, stigma self-evident. But other valences of outing linger, especially as we watch her resplendent predator hit the clubs for an electrically shot montage of bold and carnivorous seductions, her fierce femme pickup of a blonde woman and her bathroom tryst with a brown-skinned man recalling the professor's authorship of the intriguingly grouped Vampires, Negroes, and Fairies. Queerness has long been in the bloodstream of the vampire mythos; so has the language of addiction invoked just as directly when she ends the night puking all that deliciously drawn blood into an unglamorous toilet without even a lover to hold her hair; but when she lifts the frail wrist of a terminally ill child to her lips with his consent, she becomes something there's no well-worn metaphor for. Even the conventions of a passing narrative are complicated by the simple visual of dark-skinned, strong-curved Valentina with her thick crown of locs which she bundles no-nonsense for her job and draws up queenly for her nights on the town. "What I really am?" she laughs bitterly at Langston: such an open-ended question for which only the one answer matters to him. "You hate the fact that I'll outlive you and I'll show the girls who they really are—" To the preacherly accompaniment of Revelations 17:6 and Proverbs 30:14, the camera passes like candid portraiture over Black faces whose secret nature is tipped only by the amber flare within their eyes like an eclipse's corona, the smoldering threads of sunlight metabolizing within the varied darknesses of their skins. One belongs to a gurgling, sharp-toothed infant. "You don't have to believe it to be true. This is the Word of God. This is our world."

Most of all it is Valentina's world, so confidently observed that it never feels like a treatise no matter the density of its themes. She leaves nightly voicemail messages that might never reach her beloved Faith and Hope (Madison Spicer and Juniah Williams-West), channels her maternal loneliness pricked by her blood-instincts into her devoted care of Micah (Destin Khari), even with earbuds in can't tune out the pair of young lovers necking on the Lexington Avenue Express with a playful fang-nip or two. Her hunter's reputation precedes her when she comes face to face at last with the woman who has been raising her children and sleeping in their father's bed (Alexis Nichole Smith), but then she has to make the girls believe the most important thing when they discover her blood-muzzled in blue shadows splattered black, the hand she reaches out to them crescent-nailed in gore: "You don't have to be scared of Mommy. You're more like Mommy than you know." It's such a delectable, dangerous moment for the film to risk, it's as good as a cliffhanger for audience investment, but even if this glimpse is all that ever exists of Jusu's ambitious and intimate addition to the canon of Black vampire literature, at least it's a jewel. The painterly cinematography by Daisy Zhou favors the skin-sculpting saturation of bronzes and blues, bisexual lighting and the flat grey days of a sleepless city as real as the vampires in its streets. The score by Omar Ferrer makes spare use of pensive piano and buzzy glitches of bass, the intrusive high frequencies of a day-walker's heightened senses. As dreamy and documentary as the narrative can feel at the same time, it is never less than grounded by the unapologetically moment-to-moment reality of the hunger and love of Valentina. I discovered it on the Criterion Channel, but it can be watched even more handily on YouTube and Vimeo. In the absence of its full-length version, I shall just have to commit myself to the hardship of watching the director's feature debut Nanny (2022), no stranger itself to fantastical slants on motherhood. "Open the door for Mommy." This knowledge brought to you by my believing backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Haruspex: Autumn War)
Alex Garland's Men (2022) does not fail for me because I disagree with its folk horror, but it does require something like a suspension of mythological belief. Of all the folkways from which to draw an avatar of toxic masculinity, it would never have occurred to me to choose the Green Man, especially as such bluntly primal proof that #yesallmen. For two out of three acts nonetheless, the conceit throws out fruitful runners into the film's fractally off-kilter contemplations of guilt, grief, and gender. Beyond that point, I want the mythopoetic drum circle to get off my lawn.

Past the high-rise window of a flat steeped in sunset to a tisane of blood, a man falls as slowly and unstoppably as the rain; before a row of decaying cottages half absorbed into the forest's edge, a field of dandelion clocks loosens to the wind. The countryside through which the M4 winds Jessie Buckley's Harper Marlowe in her trim teal Ford Fiesta is so burgeoning and virescent, it could be a green mouth opening to deliver her to the dry stone lanes and red phone boxes of her two-week retreat at a sixteenth-century manor house for which she confesses in awe and embarrassment that she "might have splashed out just a little bit too much." With the mod cons of electric kettle and flatscreen TV socketed into its flagstones and oak beams and a jumble sale of pastoral watercolors and blue-and-white china decorating the Pompeiian smolder of its walls, it's as uncanny a chocolate box as any place so long lived in and despite a few conversational bobbles with the heartily tactless owner, Harper as she makes herself tea and touches base with a London friend looks much more at home on semi-holiday in Herefordshire than in her red-eyed memories of St Katharine Docks. Striding out for an inaugural walk among the ferns and the bluebells and the rain that makes a luminous nave of leaves, she cuts a faun's figure with her dark slant of hair falling in her eyes, hands in the pockets of her soldierly watch coat. Framed by apples and wisteria through the small-leaded panes of the living room, she could pass for an Austen heroine as she practices classically at the piano she demurred to her host about playing. The verdant land seems so reverberant to her presence that when she finds her voice bouncing back from the inside of an abandoned rail tunnel far longer and clearer than the laws of acoustics should allow, we share her delight rather than dread as she duets with herself and the moss-flocked stones, the almost acidly reflecting pool of rain-ringed water at her feet. Only when a previously unseen figure—vaguely silhouetted, yet legibly male—rises from the far leaf-lit end of the tunnel as if it has been listening in secret all the while does she falter, the looping echoes fade. The tunnel takes up a harsh staccato cry like a piston of crows; the figure runs toward her with the distance-stretching slowness of a dream and she flees as if in real, ancient panic, the fear of wild places inflicted by the goat-god. She breaks cover among the rotting bricks of the railwaymen's houses, but when she pulls out her phone to memorialize her rural urbex, inexplicably under the thin lichened boughs is standing a mother-naked man, off-color as peeled bark, and unlike many a haunting he's still there in the shot hours later when she studies it suspiciously in the bath. He's there in the garden the next day, inspecting the branch from which she broke and ate a small, half-blushed apple on arrival, thrusting an earth-grimed hand as suddenly as a tongue through the mail slot; neither of the arresting officers seems to notice the violent emerald of his eyes, how his skin beneath its rough sleeper's scabbed grazes is scrofulous with lichen. "Stinks to high heaven, though," the sympathetic policewoman who takes Harper's statement confides. As if something has been woken in the green of Cotson, the film's weirdness will proliferate exponentially from this encounter and yet it has always been present, the shadow preceding what casts it. Or as Harper catalogues her day in exhausted disbelief, "I meet a boy in a churchyard who tells me I'm a stupid bitch, then I meet a vicar who tells me that I drove James to kill himself, then I meet a policeman who tells me that they just released the naked weirdo who tried to break into the house yesterday and . . . I'm done."

At times the film feels in dialogue with John Bowen's Robin Redbreast (1970), another collision of modern womanhood with the sexuality of the land. Harper in the church where she screams her pain like a sermon is transfixed by the foliate head on one side of the font, the sheela-na-gig on the other like obverse and reverse of the same wood's coin. Her marital status is a matter of local comment, as if even in the twenty-first century there is something unsettled about a Mrs. Marlowe who insists on Ms. Perhaps her singlehood is not entirely settled for her, covering her inadvertent booking of the rental under her married name with the implication of a divorce rather than the shocks of bereavement that slice through a late gilding of light or the full-body slam of a door, the guilt that gnaws from never knowing whether her husband fell four stories to his death in a hideous accident or a suicide set like a curse on her resolve to leave him for the same reason she had to call his coercive bluff: "Because I have a life, too! I have a fucking life!" The failed joke of a stern admonition about forbidden fruit lingers allusively—sin, shame, Summerisle—over a narrative in which women are time and again held culpable for the choices of men. It happens so casually at first, it doesn't even feel like an irony that the space she's tried to give herself from her trauma seems instead to be transforming into a prism for it, the echo-faced refractions she finds everywhere in the village pitched at just the right horror of plausible deniability, less of the uncanny than of heteronormative human behavior. Harper gets the tour of Cotson Manor from the brightly bluff Geoffrey, so obviously the endling of some dwindled gentry for whom Airbnb is the last, best hope of paying the bills that the audience can almost overlook in his Barbour-jacketed haplessness how obstructively as well as comically he fumbles the bags he insists on lugging out of the car for her when she could have done a neater job herself. "If you need me," he offers wistfully, "you've got my number." The schoolboy loitering on the moss-splotched steps of the church sports a caricature mask of Marilyn Monroe; his face behind the garish plastic is adult as a changeling's, his hostile eyes poison-green. "You can't hide?" he cajoles like double-speaking. "Go on. I bet you're good at it. And I'm good at seeking." The silver-combed vicar in his black cassock teases out her fears and just as solicitously rakes her with them, one hand pressing her skirted knee with an unchanged air of mild, pastoral inquiry: "Do you prefer things to be comfortable or true? Might it be true that if you'd given him the chance to apologize, he'd still be alive?" His fingers spread over the slats of the wooden bench as if feeling for her warmth when she's gone. Over his pint at the pub with the rest of the all-male regulars, the off-duty policeman who turned loose her nuisance alarm of a home intruder grimaces defensively at her distress: "You saw him twice. I don't know if he saw you once. It's not quite stalking, is it?" The whip-round of glances as she storms out without touching the vodka tonic she wasn't even permitted to pay for underscores what the facially perceptive viewer may have already picked up. Every male part in the village—the Green Man is no exception—is played by Rory Kinnear. It works because no one comments on it; it feels like a metaphor, not a stunt. Catching the likeness to her landlord in a sap-skinned vagrant, the not quite double act of the broken-veined local lads who stare after her in the Cotson Sheaf, even we can't know if we're seeing possession or projection, a world full of hammers when you feel like a nail or a revelation of reality ley-line deep. The best of Men plays in this space of suggestion, the implication of a pattern neither clarified nor disproved. The tranquil, formal notes of Harper's piano seem to wind from the sunlit leaves of the apple tree over the cloud-banded fields into the deep, shadowy, moss-groined wood, just as the echoes of her singing will emerge from the earth to overdub themselves like residual tape loops onto the shadows of the church and the sunset-misted meadow, the dripping cavity of a dead stag's eye. Geoffrey cudgels his brain for the dying-rising crossword clue of a pomegranate like the red rinds we saw in the Marlowes' flat. A school jumper is stitched with a jagged globe of tree. The more we see of the terrible last fight between Harper and James, the less finished it feels, but none of her interactions with the Cotson men offer any direct line of challenge or closure so much as a free-floating fog of microaggressions and triggers like variations on an inexorable theme. What kind of countryside has she come to anyway, where she can find apples and bluebells in the same season and the fields curve the same luciferin green between the hedgerows as the lily-flecked slopes of the wood? The Green Man grows ever more thorn-barbed, leaf-pierced, twig-antlered, his ultimate face an epiphytic mask with blood at its roots. He never looks human and as he sits cross-legged in a lichen-stained bunker left over from the Second World War, his own fingers peel back his brow to plant the oak's green flag.

Don't tell me there's more. )

It is never fair to fault a story for not being the one you want it to be, but the fact remains that I would feel much friendlier toward the ambitious faults of Men if it were more ambivalent in its otherwise formidable treatment of the Green Man. Bias disclosed in the form of at least three poems I have written in the mythos myself, but Garland's full-frontal equation with the monstrous masculine flattens a wild thicket of old weirdness into a sort of polemic topiary that does a disservice to the near-century of rich and prolific fakelore that has flourished ever since Julia Somerset, Lady Raglan declared the architectural motif of the foliate head evidence of pagan persistence into the modern, Christian day. The identification of the feminine with civilization may be as old as Šamḫat, but it sits oddly when Harper's early scenes place her so literally in tune with the land; even a later one seems to tease her resonance with the sheela-na-gig, the stone-carved woman holding the folds of herself brazenly or apotropaically apart, before the blame she receives for inspiring such fantasies nixes any chance that the film is inviting her to become a participant in its verdant myth rather than a victim of it. It may go without saying that Men is a very straight, very cis film, even though one of the problems of misogyny is that it is not practiced strictly by cishet men. I may just have wanted the version of this story written by M. John Harrison or Mattie Joiner or Sylvia Townsend Warner. I prefer room in the bracken for everything from the Pearl-Poet's Green Knight to Greer Gilman's Tom o Cloud. And still I seem to wind up feeling about this movie something the way I feel about Mollie Hunter's A Stranger Came Ashore (1975), a selkie novel I have loved since fifth grade even though its central figure means something so different and much darker to his author than to me that I cannot on some level accept it as canonical—Garland may be almost orthogonally interested in the Green Man as far as I am concerned, but he realizes his vision so intensely that even when it bottoms out on its own metaphor I am not sorry to have experienced it. The film looks stellar. The cinematography by Rob Hardy captures the pollen-glaze of gilt-filtered light as eerily as the radioactive smears of moss leaching like lime down long-derelict stone. Without resorting to two-strip Technicolor, the red-and-green color scheme is maintained as scrupulously as a novel by Tanith Lee right down to the costume design by Lisa Duncan which furls the olive drab of Harper's coat over mullein-red trousers or a peach-colored dress. The countertenor on the dense and tensile, medievally inflected score by Ben Salisbury and Geoff Barrow lends an ecclesiastical air to some of the most visually pagan scenes while also braiding with Harper's own voice in an appropriately recursive palette. The same song brackets the action, sung first by Lesley Duncan, then covered by Elton John. Buckley uses her own Irish accent throughout, a clever, natural note of outsiderness in the English countryside; her relatively light dialogue lets her vivid face carry the weight of keeping Harper herself on the right side of archetype, as thorny as the trouble she's facing. Kinnear can hang up his hat as the heir to Alec Guinness if he wants to, but what's more impressive is how little like a one-man show his ninefold casting feels. I watched their near double act on Kanopy, but it streams on a variety of usual suspects. I can always read Alan Garner or Geraldine McCaughrean to recover, or just climb a tree. This game brought to you by my specific backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Claude Rains)
It wouldn't be hard to work up a ghost out of They All Come Out (1939). A rail-hopping, road-thumbing drifter introduced short the price of his deluxe diner plate and about to hitch himself a ride into crime, Tom Neal in his first starring feature could be warming up for his most famous, hopeless, defining role in Detour (1945), just as his baby-faced, embittered short cut to the slammer all too neatly presages the actor's incarceration for what he would defend as manslaughter as involuntary and unbelievable as any of the misfortunes of Al Roberts. The part haunted him like radiation from one end to the other of his scandal-tangled life; it makes the sense of the film's own nightmare to find it encysted in the bright future of his B-start at MGM. History may or may not recur as farce after tragedy, but it can show up for irony any time it feels like.

The fly in this hauntologically attractive framing is the film itself. They All Come Out was written by John C. Higgins and directed by Jacques Tourneur and cannot with the best of intentions and a crowbar be made to fit into the lineage of their future specialties in film noir; it was promoted from the two-reeler ranks of MGM's Crime Does Not Pay (1935–47) and as such serves up an especially square helping of the Production Code. Whether dramatizing the wages of personal sins like gambling or embezzling, the more organized rackets of protection and counterfeiting, or the institutional bad apples of political machines and the police, the short subjects of this popular, topical series—during the war, it widened its remit to include espionage, sabotage, and even the global crime of Nazism itself—could be categorized unironically as anti-noir, doing their docudrama best to scare their viewers straight with a relentlessly authoritative combination of po-faced didacticism and grisly deterrence. Got a fail-safe plan for collecting your ill-gotten gains after prison, like Robert Taylor in Buried Loot (1935)? With the cops infallibly onto your scheme from the start, you'll have hideously acid-scarred your face for $200,000 worth of nothing. Tempted to scam the insurance companies by participating in staged automobile accidents in the Oscar-winning Torture Money (1937)? Too late by the time you discover the cost in back-alley road rash and real broken bones. Catching all the crooked breaks from till-dipping to manslaughter to murder like Barry Nelson in The Luckiest Guy in the World (1947)? Fear not, your streak will run out as bluntly and absurdly as if God's own hand bank-shot a bullet your guiltily bystanding way. Even the entries which do not rely on some kind of gotcha to punch their morals home take such conservative care not to make their crimes look accidentally interesting that when a sterling rookie is revealed as a secret hood in Joseph Losey's A Gun in His Hand (1945), the extent of his corruption is a penny-ante string of warehouse robberies whose gimmick of call boxes and burglar alarms hardly seems worth the cover of police academy. MGM treated the series as a kind of minor league for new talent before and behind the camera and it is fun to watch the early efforts especially of writers, directors, and actors who would become associated with more complicated explorations of crime, but the total humorlessness of the house style makes the project hard to take seriously even in single installments and after more than one even the most upstanding viewer may find themselves longing for some profitable mayhem committed with impunity.

They All Come Out might still have fared better as a short. Dedicated to the United States Department of Justice whose cooperation enabled its location shooting at multiple correctional facilities from Atlanta to Alcatraz and introduced by the combined authorities of a former attorney general and current director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, it opens pacily enough with the convergence of the "interstate bandits" who acquire Neal's Joe Cameron for the price of a meal and a bed and the self-respect of fixing the car that ferried him from Birmingham to Hot Springs, the Depression-dream of easy money for nothing more than sticking it to the law and order that threw him off freight trains and pinched him for vagrancy and never kept him from starving. "It's the cops," he agrees grimly, accepting a cigarette from Rita Johnson's Kitty Carson, his sleek blonde savior of a moll in the market for a driver. "Always the cops. They run the country. Guy can't walk through any town without some big loudmouth copper wants to know all about him," explaining perhaps why he doesn't just shake the speed cop who whines up on their tail during his first getaway but neatly sideswipes the officer into a passing tree. Cornered by an old un-acquaintance in the last reel, forced maliciously into a robbery of the straight job he was working late in Cleveland, the same slam-bang license governs his realization that a gun in his face is nothing compared to the welding torch in his hand and the go-for-broke gruesomeness with which Joe turns the spark-splashing acetylene on his extortionist—clinched with two fists to the man's seared chin just in time for the witness of Kitty and an astounded night watchman—would stack up against any of Crime Does Not Pay's Grand Guignol. The problem is that in between these two points of hard-boiled interest come forty minutes of informercial for the American penal system and not even the loneliness of auto camps or all-night cafés can grit up its soft-soap hard sell. Forget the screws, the stoolies, the shivs and the injustices of The Big House (1930) or Brute Force (1947) or Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954). The modern penitentiary is an opportunity for self-improvement staffed by shrewdly compassionate authorities who serve more as guidance counselors than wardens, debating the social and criminal histories of their convict population before charting the safest and most productive course for each of them, as witnessed by the fates of the Reno Madigan gang. The youngest and least hardened offenders, Joe and Kitty who came up clawing out of broken homes into broken promises are the hopeful success stories, granted the chances they were denied on the outside by the minimum-security support of the Industrial Reformatory at Chillicothe and the Federal Industrial Institution for Women at Alderton. The surgical reconstruction of his never-healed wrist affords him the able-bodied opportunity to train as a machinist, she brushes up on her beautician's skills after some disillusioning real talk about the outlaw life, their eventual good conduct earns them the pen-pal privileges through which they contemplate the former mirage of a future on the level. As explained by the superintendent who shares her movie's scorn for subtext, "You're here to be helped—although you don't seem to realize it." Back at USP Atlanta, Edward Gargan's Bugs Jacklin is beginning to take the hint, since it turns out that the big lug of a recidivist wants clumsily and sincerely to make good for his estranged wife and their four-year-old son who in a gag I didn't expect from the 1930's sets off the metal detector on visiting day with a stash of bottlecaps. Even Groper Crane, the twitchy little triggerman played by John Gallaudet as though Elisha Cook Jr. and Dwight Frye were otherwise engaged, proves amenable to rehabilitation when his delusions of women hiding in his pockets to sneak his cigarettes refer him out of prison entirely and into psychiatric care, such that after some basket-weaving and a few sessions with Charles Lane, he can cheerfully dismiss his lifelong, paranoid, intrusive thoughts: "Ever since you explained why I had them, they ain't been bothering me at all." He is last seen spading the grounds of Springfield's Hospital for Defective Delinquents, a name regardless of its eugenicist antecedents I can't believe no punk band ever picked up. As for the unregenerate Reno Madigan, a slickster in the mode of a cut-rate George Raft, actually Bernard Nedell? Warehouse him on the Rock, let him dissolve into the clang of bells and the foghorn booming spectrally beyond the bars of his cell: a strange, sour note among all the reformist cheer, but well within the punitive prescriptions of Crime Does Not Pay. Compressing this material would not make it less sententious, but at least it would only hit the viewer over the head once that Joe who expressed such vivid contempt for railroad bulls and stop-and-frisk policing now accepts his salvation through the benevolent oversight of the carceral state. Instead, even the final scene in night court cannot resist reminding us through the paroled lovebirds of Joe and Kitty, in parentheses, capital letters, quotated:

"I don't know if you realize what you've done tonight. A known criminal tried to force you back into crime. A year or so ago, you both might have tried to settle this in your own way. But tonight you didn't. You both turned instinctively to the police. Your thinking is right. You have nothing to fear from now on."

Such a relief, don't you just want to throw a brick? More than any criteria of plot or style, this complacency is what keeps They All Come Out off the lists of proto-noir: there are no uncertainties in its world, only just deserts. The social dimensions of crime, the dust-bowl desperations of the country recede before the reassurance of the rectitude of the law. Joe Cameron could have hitched himself as far westward as California, but he would never have found himself on the lost highways of Detour, the shifting spaces of noir where staying in your lane never guarantees they won't move away the road. Tourneur would investigate them for RKO, but MGM wasn't even interested in the map. The photography by Clyde De Vinna and Paul C. Vogel has some nice, cheap, low-key set-ups when it isn't being Traveltalks for Prisons. The arithmetic lesson was done better in Fritz Lang's You and Me (1938). Let Tom Neal rest; the ghost in this picture is how much talent it leaves lifeless on the screen. This crime brought to you by my known backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
As quoted in Nigel Andrews on Jaws: A Bloomsbury Movie Guide (1999), Verna Fields once told Steven Spielberg, "If clouds don't match or the water isn't exactly the same colour, people won't notice if you keep the rhythm . . . If you look carefully, you will see blue sky in one segment of a scene, cloudy sky in another; choppy seas in one scene, glassy in another." I have not had an opportunity to rewatch the movie since reading the book, but I believe her, not only because she won an Oscar for her editing of Jaws (1975), but because I just ran across an example of such an invisible mismatch in the wild while I was looking for Elisha Cook Jr.'s missing thumb.

Not to exaggerate, Elisha Cook Jr. was only missing half of his left thumb. As he told the story in a 1984 interview for Cinéma cinémas (1982–91), it got sliced off during a stunt on the set of John Ford's Submarine Patrol (1938), when the water-weight of a storm scene thundered the flailing actor right into a guy wire: "And so Mr. Ford came up to me, he said, 'Gee, that was a hell of a shot, Cookie.' I said, 'Yeah, it sure was, Mr. Ford, I just cut my thumb off,' and he passed out." He never hid it; he didn't need to. He was so expressive with props and gestures that I had been admiring his hands for years without noticing, long-fingered and nervous and what he did with them—turning over a cigarette lighter like a problem, drumming his second thoughts against his teeth—was patently more interesting than the number of his fingernails. I kept forgetting to see if it was visible in his movies even after I knew. When I finally remembered two-thirds of the way through rewatching Robert Wise's Born to Kill (1947), what I found instead was two different takes in the same scene.

I know that film is a whole lot of time out of joint pasted over with pattern recognition and the persistence of vision, but it's still instructive to spot an unintended seam. Cook is snowing Esther Howard, his foot in her door and his hat held over his heart like a Bible salesman before he turns on the preposterous charm that she doesn't trust for a second and so delights in: "Well, I'm not going to do much, so I won't need much. A C-note should make me very happy." The camera favors his performance first, then her callout of it, which gives him the chance to protest his crook's honesty, and between shots his hands jump from delicately fingering the brim of his fedora to folded businesslike across it, too completely for them to have come to rest of their own accord. The dialogue is uninterrupted and so is the actors' rapport, it's just the glitch of blocking that gives away that the reverse shot wasn't just another camera but another take. It slid past me the first time I saw the scene, while I was busy absorbing all kinds of other emotional, narrative, acting details; I caught it only because I was tracking Cook's hands more than his jaunty air or his teasing voice, the confidential flirt of his brows as he leans in for the ingenuous confession, "Through underworld connections, like it says in the newspapers. I'm a bad boy." Different rhythms than the ones which Fields was describing, but just as key to pulling an audience through the continuity of the story rather than the snags of the chopped-up instants which construct it on the screen. Even watching for the discrepancies, they disappear like blind spots the second a good line or a better expression comes along. Howard with her arms skeptically akimbo isn't quite as the camera left her, either, but her redoubtable, contiguous world-weariness means the disposition of her hands took me even longer to clock than her scene partner's. The other part of the illusion is how much you care about hair that was windblown in an exterior shot and re-tousled for the rear projection, a skip in the white noise of the room or the stages of the knotting of a tie, artifacts of the other kind of time in which the production was embedded, whose traces inside or outside the cutting room always remain. No style is invisible, only familiar. I have seen odd cuts go by in scenes before and only sometimes do I find out they marked a retake. But I missed the change of skies the first time I saw Jaws, even without the excuse of New England weather, and Elisha Cook Jr.'s hands make me wonder what other seamless gaps I don't see. He does a wonderful bit with his wristwatch as Mart Waterman, absently pleating the cuff of his shirt as he calculates the time; it's even better than his mime of just having been stabbed in the shin with a hatpin mid-murder. This note brought to you by my underworld backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Cho Hakkai: intelligence)
Fifty-five years ago, Wendell Corey drank himself to death at the age of fifty-four and I'm still sore at him about it. In honor of his yahrzeit, I finally decided to watch the film in which he made his screen debut, Lewis Allen's Desert Fury (1947). I wish I could have sat Wittgenstein down in front of this movie some afternoon when he needed a Technicolor shower bath for his brain. Fellas, it is gay.

Desert Fury does not come from the future. Cast with contract players, lit and shot in accordance with classical continuity, constructed around the expectations and fulfillment of melodrama within the cordons of the Production Code, it is legibly and inescapably a high-end programmer from the Hollywood studio system of the late '40's, specifically Paramount where Hal Wallis was assembling and showcasing a stock company of his discoveries. It just also feels as though it emerged from some oneiric hothouse where everything from the line readings to the color of the rufous earth is flatter, lusher, more banal, more perverse than even the average film noir, Western, or Gothic. Should your definitions of queerness incline toward excess, artifice, desires unclassifiable, non-normative, and skew-whiff, this picture will clear the bar like a green carnation. DPs Charles Lang and Edward Cronjager lend the same super-saturation to the syrup-gold of Lizabeth Scott's hair as the sucked-plum gloss of her Chrysler convertible, the pastel-sunned awnings of the small-town main street of Chuckawalla and the ultramarine overcast of its cloud-crammed day-for-night. The mise-en-scène pops like a stereoscope between location shots and rear projections of same, studio interiors as expertly dressed as magazine spreads and exteriors fragmented between the Arizona storefronts of Cottonwood and the California gingerbread of the Piru Mansion. The costume changes are as gratuitous as the continually flourishing strings by Miklós Rózsa, a rose-pink hair ribbon in a midnight thunderstorm. As escalated to the screen by Robert Rossen and an uncredited A.I. Bezzerides from the serialized source material of Ramona Stewart's Desert Town (1945), the plot purports to chart the coming of age of the headstrong, stifled Paula Haller (Scott) as she negotiates between the familiar affection of deputy sheriff Tom Hanson (Burt Lancaster) and the more dangerous mysteries of out-of-town racketeer Eddie Bendix (John Hodiak), complicated from both directions by the possessiveness of her deep-pocketed queenpin of a mother, Fritzi (Mary Astor), and the hostility of her new flame's longtime companion, Johnny Ryan (Corey), but in practice its action is repetitious to the point of ritual, a face-slapping, a slamming out of the house, a furious drive in a car that never seems to get anywhere, racing the straightaway between the sandstone bands of the mountains as though the fateful truss bridge at the town limits were an event horizon. Until a final detonation of secrets blows the pattern apart, its vivid thinness may be the practical result of paring the more communal novel down to its central actors, but it locks the film even further into its dreamlike, fetishistic structure of intersecting triangles around whose points the characters are flung by the gravity of their needs and fantasies. "This is what I like," Paula explains as she sits on a split-railed fence at the ranch where Eddie and Johnny are staying, the latter having pointedly absented himself to take care of the housework, "to be alone on the desert, with the sagebrush and the sky." Under this overheated cyclorama of a firmament, good luck.

From the first hit of its tempestuous theme over red-brushed, yucca-backed titles, I was not surprised that this film has both a camp cult and serious champions; Astor alone could attract both as the butch, imperious Fritzi who runs the town where a decade ago she came west for her health like her own small-scale Vegas, greeting her glamorous daughter with the casual, appraising, "You look good to me, baby, even when you're tired," watching her go with a world-weary snap of the fingers: "Nineteen years, like that." Loose-limbed in flowing slacks, she's never more jeweled and femme than when she bids to buy her daughter into respectability with a marriage to the clean-cut Tom, sweetening the deal for the former rodeo star with the dowry of a ranch. "I like to keep my amateur standing," the leather-jacketed deputy demurs. The film never does make much beyond echoes of the agreement that Paula looks far more like Eddie's late wife than her own mother, but it leans so hard into her habit of calling the toughly elegant older woman by name, treated to shopping trips and admired like arm candy in front of third parties, into Fritzi's offer on the night of the thunderstorm to sleep with the tear-tossed girl who has just been kissed for the first time by the forbidden awakening of Eddie Bendix and threatened for the first time by the lean, cold-eyed man who lives with him, that while I wouldn't have wanted the Breen office to scream sex perversion and slap down whatever weird partials Astor was layering into the maternal mix, I am not quite sure how it failed to hear them. Then again, no one clocked Corey.

Fourth-billed, the role of Johnny Ryan would never have been star-making despite the prestige of an introducing credit, but it is a hell of a calling card for a character specialist: coiled and mesmerizing, stone cold and queer to the bone. Nothing much in his early scenes distinguishes him from the traditional muscle in waiting at his big shot's shoulder, cracking wise about coppers, placating the testier instincts of the sharp-dressed, dark-mustached man he shadows, but there's something about him that a goon's role doesn't explain, a watchfulness in his ice-clear eyes and the aerodynamically sharp planes of his face. He cooks and cleans like a housewife, takes orders like a soldier, attends like a personal trainer on the bare-chested, sunbathing Eddie, as mindful as a manager of the other man's reputation in the rackets after a recent bad break in Vegas. "Why would there be some of me apart from Eddie?" he returns like a riddle when Paula queries their closeness which seems to leave no room for any interests or aspirations original to Johnny. He smiles as if in the same confidence of a private joke when she challenges him recklessly, outright: "He won't leave me. I come in too handy." Working under the hood of their battered sage-green 1946 DeSoto Custom, oil-sweated in a white undershirt with his dark hair greased back, he has a hustler's delinquent look, although according to the history Eddie relates to a fascinated Paula, the pick-up went the other way:

"I was your age, maybe a year older. It was in the Automat off Times Square about two o'clock in the morning on a Saturday. I was broke. He had a couple of dollars. We got to talking. He ended up paying for my ham and eggs . . . I went home with him that night. I was locked out, didn't have a place to stay. His old lady ran a boarding house in the Bronx. There were a couple of vacant rooms. We were together from then on."

Times Square, for the love of Chip Delany. Fifteen years later, the scrupulous detail of the separate rooms has given way to the bachelor clutter of the Halverson ranch where Eddie jokes about his sleeping habits, after Paula's sharp glance at the rumpled, unmade bed—"I curl up like a kitten." One of Johnny's shirts is hanging off the windowsill on the other side. Catching her domestically clearing up, another moment of interrupted rapport with Eddie, he takes the stack of old newspapers and emptied ashtrays out of her hands with the dry, meaningful, "You shouldn't do that, kid. First thing you know, I'll be out of a job." It is not an untroubled arrangement. Despite or because of Johnny's all-round attentions, Eddie treats him with brusque presumption, slaps him as often and more demeaningly than Fritzi slaps Paula, gestures of dominance bristling with insecurities which Johnny's submissiveness seems to feed as much as allay, especially the times it feels more like tolerance than capitulation, biding his third wheel's time as he's done through previous infatuations, even the marriage to Angela which ended through the railing of the Chuckawalla bridge. The mode in which he is brazenly rude to Paula is commonly designated as catty when exchanged between women, but his threat to kill her if she doesn't get away from his man isn't just claws out: a hard-hollowed mask of lamplight in the crack of the frame, he looks like he'll do it if he doesn't slam the door between them. Few of Corey's characters had that tense solidity of violence; it's impressive that it didn't type him as a hood. And yet isn't the part in keeping with his later, heterosexual specialty in romantic losers? Already serving a breakfast for three, he has to listen to himself not just dumped by Eddie before he can drink his coffee, but fruitlessly pleading to stay on even without his cut, his eyes flickering with sudden sick defeat to the blonde girl watching over her cigarette with a defiance of triumph she isn't quite grown enough to conceal, though she has enough pity on the newly odd man out to hold up the dark fairy tale of their escape from Chuckawalla long enough to let a stranded Johnny collect his suitcase and join them as far as the nearest train station, chauffeuring the fugitive couple, as Eddie callously stipulates, to "earn his ride." With her first misgivings about the man she's eloping with, Paula draws the dot-to-dot parallel herself: "I hope you never get finished with me . . . I'd hate to be left alone on a desert road at night."

I've been tied up with you too long to go on alone. )

It would be unfair, albeit almost irresistible, to subtitle any serious consideration of Corey's screen persona The Art of Losing. He excelled at the less heroic emotions, but he was compelling and credible wherever he fetched up in the audience's sympathy, he had a chameleon's invaluable near-miss of conventional looks and a voice as good as radio to play against them, and it continues to amaze me that he was signed direct from the original Broadway production of Elmer Rice's Dream Girl (1945) because not once in his screen career was he cast as such a successful leading man of romantic comedy as Clark Redfield, the brash aspiring sportswriter who makes his entrance under a stack of ARCs which he cheerfully admits he never reads before reviewing and doesn't win the heroine's heart so much as he accidentally bickers his way into it, a tethering jolt of realism for her fantasies and never quite as authentically cynical as he likes to make out. I would give a lot for a time machine and a ticket to the Coronet Theatre. Hollywood did not have such a surfeit of shape-changers of his caliber that he could afford to wash out after an effective decade of film and a Z-grade epilogue whose titles depress me. I know little about his life, the majority of it from his chapter in Karen Burroughs Hannsberry's Bad Boys: The Actors of Film Noir (2003). He was born in Dracut, raised in East Longmeadow and Springfield, acted with his wife at the Copley Theatre in Boston. I have always hoped that both of these interviews contain more truth than publicity, because who doesn't like dry stone walls and weird faces? He was not actually descended, as often claimed, from John Adams, but thanks to the gene puddle of colonial Newburyport, he looks like a distant relation of [personal profile] spatch. Either way, he might not have appreciated my observing his yahrzeit, but in the same way that I don't get to yell at him about his liver, he doesn't get to gripe about how delightful I find it that BAMF Style devoted a column to his look in Desert Fury—the signet ring seems to have belonged to the actor, as I have never seen him in a role without it—and a full decade before it made any difference to me, he got a repertory series of his own from the Berkeley Art Museum & Pacific Film Archive. I have still not seen him at the end of his tenure with Paramount in Loving You (1957), but it's on my list because Boyd McDonald, in Cruising the Movies: A Sexual Guide to Oldies on TV (1985/2015), rates Corey highly as "an inspiring example of how a man . . . can be alluring despite the fact that he is 43 years old and, worse, a Republican." If he was not himself allured by men offscreen, he gave a damn fine imitation of it on. Should you wish to sample his contributions to the unstable cocktail of Desert Fury, it is shockingly unavailable to stream legally, but Kino Lorber can do you the Blu-Ray/DVD. I was not sure what to expect from its legendarily queer reputation, but it's the real, elusive, subversive deal. "We've been together a long time." This love brought to you by my handy backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
I will always concur with the characterization of noir as anxious cinema, but there's anxiety and then there are movies you just want to hand a frozen orange and give them the rest of the night off. Budd Boetticher's The Killer Is Loose (1956) is an unnerved little picture. It's tied up in domestic knots, still jangling from the war, and packed full of gender trouble I hadn't thought would detonate on American screens until the next decade. About the only thing that doesn't have it worried is the bomb, but it doesn't make that much difference; for its title character, the end of the world's been and gone.

Suburban noir by 1956 was a regular flavor, but the bank windows of a small building and loan office in downtown Los Angeles set such a blandly commercial scene that the time-tabled, vérité-clocked signals of the men about to knock it over feel like a thesis statement, just as the tabloid scream of the title and the ominous, allegorical figure casting its cowl of shadow behind the credits anticipate a killer as recognizable as an angel of death, which the film will withhold in favor of something more oblique, laconic, upsetting. If we believe his old sergeant who recognizes him behind the teller's counter with the jocular punching down of their days in the South Pacific, Leon Poole (Wendell Corey) not only wouldn't hurt a fly, he'd lose his rifle first, trip over his own feet, the bottle-bottom slabs of his glasses justifying the humiliating nickname of "Corporal Foggy, the Jungle Killer." The heroism of the pistol-whipping he takes for charging one of the robbers in the split second of the heist is short-lived in its verisimilitude when he betrays himself as the inside man on a tapped line down which his confederate furiously hisses, "Hang up, you stupid!" Barricaded into his walk-up garden apartment, he's pegged as a "scared amateur" who choked at the sight of police, but there's nothing second-rate about Poole gathering into his arms the slender toppled silhouette that was his beloved Doris (Martha Crawford), cut down by irrevocable mistake as Lieutenant Sam Wagner of the LAPD (Joseph Cotten) crashed through the bolted, bullet-drilled door, the woman everyone had told him wasn't home dead before her husband had time to drop his gun. "Don't you see how wrong it was to do that? To kill her?" His eyes are trapped like tears inside their black horn-rims, lost a thousand yards. By the time of his sentencing, however, they have found a focus, and they remain fixed on her as if there is nothing else in the courtroom, not the regretful judge, not the ineffectual lawyer, not the mixed, pitying audience of cops and their wives or even her husband to whom he addresses the curiously conversational warning, "Someday, Wagner, I'm going to settle with you for it. I'm certainly going to settle with you for it." Three years later when he busts out of the state honor farm with a startling act of violence in the middle of a lettuce field, it takes far too many misses of roadblocks and dragnets for the state and municipal police to realize the truth: this nondescript, middle-aged, white-collar criminal with a store-stolen .357 Magnum isn't homing in on a cop-killing, not when he can exact a far more poignant turnabout on the detective who bereaved him of his wife. Life for life, grief for grief, Leon Poole wants Lila Wagner (Rhonda Fleming). "He'll still take you if he can't reach her. But, Sam, she's the number one target."

Closely fleshed out by Harold Medford from the 1953 novelette by John and Ward Hawkins, The Killer Is Loose could run its jitters on the mere ordinariness of Poole, such a soft-spoken epitome of the killer next door that it lands with accidental rimshot when the building manager, the night of the arrest, indignantly affirms the Pooles as "two of the nicest tenants we've ever had." He can't be seen coming to a degree that the film dramatizes ironically, the removal of his glasses—he can't squint to read a street sign without them—rendering him as invisible as an alter ego even when his mug shot has been circulated to the patrolmen who wave him on with the wrong driver's license, slapped across the papers consumed by oblivious passersby, the law-abiding and the law-enforcing alike fumbling in his bat-blind wake. "Don't you read the newspapers? Today's paper? Turn on your television set or listen to the radio?" Perhaps he learned his lessons better than his sergeant thought, or perhaps he just needed the right objective. A laughingstock of a soldier for Uncle Sam in the Pacific, on a home-front suicide mission he's a damn near commando, razor-focused and ruthless, improvising escape after subterfuge after murder with heartbroken, detached efficiency. It makes him frightening, especially when his resourcefulness includes the close-up nastiness of a hand-held throat-hacking, the hefting implications of a sickle, the arterial explosion of milk that caps a home invasion like a premonition of The Manchurian Candidate (1962). "What else could I do?" he asks the glass-splashed kitchen afterward, as blankly as if the woman in a dead faint beside her dead husband should answer his reasonable question. At the end of his quest is an innocent stranger who never did anything more to him than live. The audience may feel encouraged to agree with the general opinion of the LAPD, Sam included: "The guy's a psycho!" And yet Poole can't be as easily othered as all that. He has no diagnoses, no delusions, no history of violence beyond his undistinguished, perhaps not even active service in WWII; despite his pained recollections of ridicule as far back as childhood, he doesn't play like his fermenting insecurities finally cracked like a cluster bomb. He plays like grief-shock, so total and deranging that in three years it hasn't scarred over, hasn't even taken the raw edge off the dreaming, disbelieving tone in which he speaks of his wife whether he's kneeling beside her body or recalling her over the barrel of a revolver, as if she's still warm in his arms, her eyes just closing, as if he could describe her back to life. "She never laughed at me . . . You don't know how important that was. It was the difference between being dead and being alive. I loved her more than anything in the world. More than life. Much more." It touches and chills at once; even more than the scare of a psycho killer in the most mild-mannered of skins, Poole is a memento mori, a bleak, inescapable invitation to imagine the heart-stopping loss of the people who love us for our awkward, inglorious selves, without whom we might spin so far out of our own lives that we might as well have died with them. He has suffered the bereavement that Lila only fears, preparing to leave her husband mid-crisis, pregnant with their long-awaited child, rather than endure another day of waiting to lose him in the line of duty. Does it make her more neurotic, or him more normal? It binds them as surely as the KTTV coverage of the manhunt which plays in both the house where Lila has been stashed for her own protection and the house which Poole has commandeered for his, a real-time gambit on Sam's part which pays off in a tour-de-force of security theater, the walkie-talkie chatter of staked-out surveillance reduced to helpless spectatorship as killer and quarry converge on the same streetlit lawn. Even then, as the click of heels and the cock of triggers count down the last seconds until Lila, the radium dial of her rain-strung red hair reflecting in the wet-leaved suburban dark, takes the deliberate, nightmare turn down her own street while close behind her treads the uncanny object of Leon Poole, his telltale glasses shining like headlights inside the hood of a woman's raincoat, bare-legged in her white boots like some avenging amalgam of himself and his dead wife, we don't actually want to see him crumpled in a hail of gunfire any more than we want to watch him kill Lila instead. Hellbent and grotesque, he stands apart from the other screen killers of his decade who punctured the American dream with their reminders that a car, a bar, a house call were nowhere safe. He couldn't just happen to us; he could be us. Stalker-slasher prototype of Hitchcock and De Palma that he may be, Poole remains too close—in all senses—to home.

The best compliment I may be able to pay The Killer Is Loose is not that Corey is nigh unrecognizable playing a man without a wry bone in his body, but that it took me three months to realize that Doris is a woman in the refrigerator, because the vividness of loss she represents is so three-dimensional that she feels as present as Lila or Sam; this movie can sometimes be heard grinding between the psychotic and the procedural, but whenever it gets its grief in gear, it goes like the proverbial son-of-a-bitch. It is clever of it to leave the motivation for Poole's original turn toward crime unspoken except in the contrast of their two-room apartment with the new-construction houses of the Wagners or the Gillespies (Michael Pate and Virginia Christine) or the loan-assisted Otto and Grace Flanders (John Larch and Dee J. Thompson), but it's even subtler that it lets almost nothing but the acting suggest the guilt that Poole can never admit to himself, that like many a noir shlimazl before him he took a fatal short cut in his desperation to be a good provider and has been left paying more than he would ever have gained. "She didn't know about it, the hold-up. Not till tonight . . . Even after I told her, she still wanted to go with me." Even at his most disturbing, which is the scene in the kitchen, unshaven, filthy-shirted, fraying with fatigue as he hears his hated nickname again and the heavy short revolver wavers in his hand, he never quite completes the full heel turn, which cannot save him, but impresses me. It is a small but careful cruelty of the universe that the courtroom confronting the bereaved Poole seems suddenly full of couples, as the night bus that Lila catches from the corner in front of the liquor store contains too many anonymous, bespectacled men. The cinematography by Lucien Ballard slips effortlessly from the day-flat to the night-spiked and the whole feature runs 73 minutes, in case you have another panic attack to get to. TCM ran it for Rhonda Fleming as part of their Summer Under the Stars, but it plays without too much static on the Internet Archive. The more movies I see from this decade, the more I don't know how the myth of the white picket fence ever formed at all. This target brought to you by my number one backers at Patreon.
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
I did not enjoy Harriet Craig (1950) for entirely different reasons than I did not enjoy Craig's Wife (1936). It starts like a slightly curdled sitcom, but it finishes full bore Gothic. What it lacks in social criticism, it makes up in emotional cruelty. When offered a choice between a queer-eyed despair of matrimony and the anamnesis of a particularly nasty case, I may have to acknowledge that the property may be domestic horror whichever way it cuts.

Less of a remake than a re-adaptation by Anne Froelick and James Gunn of George Kelly's Pulitzer-winning Craig's Wife (1925), Harriet Craig was the second of three vehicles for Joan Crawford directed by Vincent Sherman and as such fascinates me because even in an era where the spectacle of a destructive, transgressive woman offered as much tinsel-sanctioned escapism as cautionary moral, the point of identification eludes me. Brittle, immaculate, her brows as blameless as her shoulders are squared, Crawford's Harriet Craig has none of the night-blooming amorality of Lizabeth Scott's Jane Palmer, the flinty nihilism of Ann Savage's Vera, or even the surreal avarice of Jean Gillie's Margot Shelby, a femme so fatale she gets the same man killed twice in the scrap-budget noir Decoy (1946). What she provides is less sensational, more frightening: a vividly convincing, realistically proportioned primer of emotional abuse.

I do not throw the word around lightly, in life or in fiction. In her four years of marriage to Walter Craig, Harriet has not merely redecorated their spacious, tree-shaded middle-class home to a pinnacle of inviolable glamour consistent with the Kelly-penned premise of a woman who treats her house better than anyone who has to share it with her; like a demurely inexorable cuckoo, she has expunged almost all traces of her husband's childhood home as systematically and successfully as she has isolated him from his former circle of friends, the better to reproach a rare wistful objection with the wounded, solicitous, "Darling, I didn't think we needed other people around to make us happy." She is always indulging her husband, always forgiving him, always bearing fondly with his oft-reminded naïveté which obliges instruction in the home-wrecking implications of a neighborly gift of roses as matter-of-factly as she plans his meals, supervises his schedule, manages the household accounts. The sexual candor of their relationship would be charming if it were not spelled out in so many words as one more tool in her box of tricks, so efficiently deployed that he cancels a golf date with his oldest friend at the mere whisper of a long, hot bath, his sticky, beglamoured expression leaving less to the imagination than her departing skin-swish of silk. "She could build a nest in his ear and he'd never know it." It is equally impossible for his Tati-esque inability to find a comfortable position on his own sofa to play as real comedy rather than an acrid literalization of just how uninhabitable this so-called living room has become since the days when half the kids in the neighborhood used to run wild through it and his mother kibitzed Thursday night poker—like the rest of the house, it exists now as an exacting showcase for its new mistress, even the nap of the carpet on the grand proscenium sweep of the staircase brushed to printless purity. The Chinoiserie of its formally flamboyant style invites admiration as hands-off as velvet ropes and glass cases. As the shell-shocked new maid observes to the battle-hardened housekeeper in one of the ringing silences an even fractionally displeased Harriet tends to leave in her wake, "I bet if she had her way, she'd wrap up this whole place in cellophane." The effect may hew more faithfully than Arzner's film to Kelly's stated conception of Harriet as an "SOB," but it forces the point as far as muddling it: the picture that emerges is less of a woman in desperate symbiosis with her house whose homeostasis she must maintain even at a cost of monumental deceit than a woman whose rigid, compulsive manipulation of other people necessarily spills over into control of their physical terrain. "I don't like the feeling of being rushed along in the darkness," a night journey by train prompts her to admit. "Having no control, putting my life completely in someone else's hands—" Her preemptive strike philosophy of marriage, in which a man is targeted, trained, and then constantly surveilled so as to assure the woman of her upper hand while protecting his illusion of autonomy, cues up Frank Loesser's "Marry the Man Today" in a key of gaslight, a ball-and-chain joke played horrifically straight. Harriet in 1936 was willing to obstruct justice to prevent a murder investigation from invading the fragile, conditional safe space of her home, but Harriet in 1950 all but destroys her husband professionally in order to keep him from an assignment in Tokyo that might get him six thousand miles out from under her thumb. That she fails is ultimately a combination of overreach and chance, the uncontrollable variables which she always tried to keep as contained as the maritally auspicious rice inside her prize antique of a fourteenth-century Ming vase. Until it's poured out in a final, contemplative slithering of abandoned luck, it feels telling of our understanding of Harriet that we weren't sure if there was anything inside the symbol at all.

As played by Wendell Corey with his irreplaceable flair for romantic losers, Walter is either the MVP or the biggest miscalculation of Harriet Craig. Instead of a dolt or a prig whose exploitation we might approve as turnabout for his complacent chauvinism, he's sweet, smart, and defenseless, a rising engineer in the new field of electroacoustics characteristically apologizing his entrance, "We were running a test on a new amplifier—I couldn't leave the lab till it was finished!" He is responsible for several of his company's patents, including the new system in Japan. The days of an unscheduled marital separation can be stratigraphically dated by the sedimentation of shirts, ties, socks, and shorts, and what may well have been the same suit all week. He doesn't seem to suffer from social impairment when he loans out the Sunday comics to the kid next door and is delighted to have the pants beat off him at gin rummy by his boss' card-sharping wife, but at the least reproof from Harriet he freezes into an anxious, schoolboyish guilt, fumbling through recriminations for the reprieve of a kiss that ends too soon. Her slightly tart claim to love him for his guilelessness may be an admission that he was the easiest gazelle to cut out of his herd, but the neg itself suggests the devouring is not yet complete. His sly, surprising humor sneaks out, his active concern for the lives and loves of other people will culminate in the sentence, so shocking it gets him listened to, "I don't care what Harriet said." It heightens the film's resemblance to a kind of hell-flipped Ibsen. Corey's celebrated impersonation of a lust-smacked sap notwithstanding, Walter's so earnestly hooked on his wife's happiness that even as the frog-boiling constriction of their married life dawns on him at last, he's still grasping for ways to understand a relationship that never was any such thing. No single lie or insult breaks the spell so much as the evening he spends with the forbidden neighbors, folded comfortably on the floor in front of the repaired radio with a pair of needle-nose pliers still in hand, smoking his much-deplored pipe and hugged so unselfconsciously goodnight by a child like the one he's never been able to have with Harriet, it's a gift he could never have asked for. It's more than the post-war ideal of the nuclear family, so conscious a contrast to the pristine sterility of the Craig household—a more sentimental film would have slotted him automatically as a stepfather elect, but for all of his wife's insinuations about "well-to-do young widows who specialize in approaches," there's not a milliampere of romance between him and Fiona O'Shiel's Mrs. Frazier, who knits as easily on the couch in her cat-eye glasses as if he's been coming around to fix the radio for years. It is simply, humanly nice. The well-used furniture clutters up the room a little, the coffee table slides with magazines, the books lean on their shelves as if they are often taken out. Walter on his abstracted way to the door trips over a model train and apologizes and is not scolded for it, just as when he asked a peculiar question out of nowhere, it was considered and given a serious, kindly reply. It is a house in which people live as if they actually like one another. It is as painful and recognizable as Harriet herself that the concept has become so strange to him. Not much can amend the adolescence of his famous gestures, on returning to his own untouchable, alienated house, of ashing his cigarette deliberately on the rug and breaking his wife's treasured vase, but Corey at least performs the latter with the volcanism of bridge-burning rather than spite and notably unlike his counterpart in 1936, he never takes refuge in the self-righteous myths of misogyny. Even at the last, with his coat over his arm and his hand on the door he has to walk out for his life, his movie makes no claim that he's stopped loving Harriet, this dazzling woman who made him feel that every bit of himself he gave up was the dearest, most romantic thing he could do for her. "I didn't say I could forget you. But I won't be back."

Harriet Craig allows its title character her tragedy. When she reveals, in a raw volley of a monologue contributed by Crawford herself, the grinding, demonizing poverty of her childhood into which she and her mother were precipitated after Harriet caught her father cheating and he never came home again, we understand without any psychobabble that some deep, driving part of her has remained that child frozen in guilt and abandonment, who believes like every child that the divorce, the abuse, the death was within their control; whose sudden, shuddering sob at the finality of the front door clicking shut makes far more sense than the loss of a punching bag or a meal ticket because it is exactly the nightmare she warped herself and everyone around her to prevent and so made sure of, compacting her life ever more forcibly into its porcelain illusion of perfection until it shattered under the strain. "I think you're telling me the truth for the first time . . . You'd never feel safe with anybody until you'd crushed them." Cool motive, still domestic abuse. And such a waste, when we can see for ourselves the formidable energies Harriet pours into the domination of her household as if, indeed, conducting a scorched earth campaign. Her interview with the head of the electronics company is a masterclass of malign diplomacy, tearfully, tactfully discouraging all chance of future promotion for her husband without risking the security of his current position, relying with exquisite vulnerability on the discretion of his boss who will do his paternalistic part to protect the brave little woman who entrusted him with her marriage's secret shames; in the meantime she has arranged an alibi as airtight as if she's assassinating a man and not just his character, including the intelligence that the victim will be safely occupied with voltmeters and oscilloscopes all afternoon. Imagine her handling the Tokyo job. General MacArthur, look to your stars. It makes her fixation on the domestic sphere feel even more damaged and self-sabotaging, especially since she is shown to exist in a world in which women work—it's not even a compliment, just a natural question when the serious suitor of the orphaned cousin whom Harriet has leashed as her personal dogsbody asks, "Say, how come a smart girl like you isn't holding down a good job someplace?" Harriet gave up a good job of her own to marry Walter, citing emotional over financial security. The American Fifties have become such shorthand for grey flannel and homemaking, it is fascinating to see this decision in 1950 regarded as suspicious and retrograde. In general Harriet Craig takes a visible care to distinguish its story from a battle of the sexes. The "old crowd" from whom Walter has been cleaved off are not a bachelor gang, but a mixed group of mostly couples; he makes a sharp crack about girls sticking together when he discovers Harriet's cousin covering for her, but in fact he has more female allies than male, however unwitting or unnoticed, the reality check of the nextdoorekeh, the shrewd matron who asks the questions no one else does and applies her own conclusions, the housekeeper who explains her endurance under Harriet with the stubborn, if slightly saddened, "Mr. Craig is a very nice man." Harriet, actually, seems just as isolated from feminine solidarity as from male impediments. Her cousin is not her confidante but her catspaw and her treatment of the servants is more honest only in that it is curter and colder still. She revises the truth so often as needed, it is impossible to tell if she really felt snubbed by the women of Walter's crowd when she met them or if the accusation merely furnished the excuse not to interact with them again. At the expensive sanitarium where her mother drifts in a private, dissociated reality even less penetrable than her daughter's house, she even cuts short her debrief with the chief doctor when the older woman's professional judgment does not conform to Harriet's preferred narrative. She may not be able to exist with anyone, really, whether she can crush them or not. She always needs to have charge of the story. She needs the world to be her way, especially when it won't.

Unlike Craig's Wife, I don't have even a straw-grasping fix-it for Harriet Craig: that last shot of her ascending into the shadows of her home, a small, implacable figure in a phantom float of peignoir, her hair sharp as darkness, her face weeping stone, as if she has become already the haunting of this house whose heart she devoured until it died around her, is so absolute that while it does not affect me in the same way as the ending of the earlier film, it must be acknowledged as blastingly depressing. I do not know what to do with it. Harriet's traumatized drive to reconstruct a family even if she has to suture it together with gaslighting and intimidation is too wounded to feel like the kind of bitch-goddessing that can be either defiantly or ironically embraced, too particularized and wrecking for any wider commentary. The film may have been stranded between its source material and its own story, translating actions and recasting lines that no longer run in tandem with one another. Except that it retains the image of the house itself crashing down, it is superfluous for Walter to smash the vase into the fire screen when he has already turned the rice out of it like an hourglass, the ritual of their marriage run out. "Since when have I been such a moron I couldn't struggle along without you?" is a much more hurt and less high-hat line than its sniffily sexist original, but then it's even nastier for Harriet to escalate the argument by ridiculing her husband sexually, and then it further confuses the issue that Columbia borrowed an actor who can look so braced and vulnerable as Walter makes himself articulate the terms of their marriage that he thought went without saying: "I've wanted you to be honest with me. To trust me. I've wanted you to love me." The production may also just have thrown a rod somewhere. Perhaps I should see more mid-century melodramas. Insofar as I have much sense of Crawford's post-Code image, I associate it with anguished women in social binds whom the audience is supposed to feel for, not women whose intimately murmured delivery of the promise, "I'll never let you out of my sight again," could cause an audience to move out of state just in case she looks round. It is not a bad performance. It is an extremely good performance, amplified by Corey and the ensemble acting of K.T. Stevens, Allyn Joslyn, Lucile Watson, Viola Roache, and Ellen Corby. It just happens to be an extremely good performance of a kind of behavior I don't enjoy. It turned up on Tubi and I thought I knew what I was getting from the Arzner film; I did not. At least I appreciate that it contains something which I am not sure I have seen even in a pre-Code, namely the suggestion of a woman faking orgasm. "How many ways can you lie, Harriet? You lie when you cry, you lie when you smile, you lie when you talk. Do you also lie when you—" This truth brought to you by my new backers at Patreon.
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
Dark City (1950) bears the distinction of lending its name as a metonym for the world of film noir, which must be nice for it since taken strictly as a movie, it's kind of a mess.

Taken strictly as half a movie, it's a taut little entry in the lowlife's nightmare, setting the clock ticking like its six-month predecessor and near-namesake Night and the City (1950) on a no-good's race against a self-inflicted fate. Through its darkened studio streets, the proto-slasher simplicity of the plot tracks the body count of a rigged poker game which left its mark dead and his hustlers at the mercy of his vengeful brother, tracked down in turn to be strangled and hanged in awful reenactment of a cleaned-out sucker's suicide by a stranger who never tips his hand until it's too late. "Any man in this room might be Sidney Winant. He knows us. He can see us . . . We can't see him." It's lean, it's lurid, and the cast assembled to tighten its screws is superb. Making his professional film debut as far from Biblical heroes as you could throw him, Charlton Heston stars as Danny Haley, two-bit card shark and proprietor of a bookie joint no amount of payola can prevent the vice squad from raiding in time for a virtuous Easter. His tight, down-and-out look works nicely against his varsity shoulders, but there's some wound beneath his wolfish philosophy which he refuses like a penitence to disclose to the girl he buys odd, offhand little presents for and insists he can't love, reserving his time-killing for late nights with his bickering, unofficial crew—Ed Begley Sr.'s Barney who has a bellyache for every occasion and the antacid-coated ulcers to back them up, Jack Webb's Augie not helping as the kind of putz who still thinks dribble glasses are funny, and Harry Morgan continuing his run of mid-century weirdos with Soldier, a damaged ex-pug who really isn't the dummy his slow, furrowed speech can let him be taken for. He has the beleaguered air of a silent clown when, confronted with a counterful of phones all ringing unanswerably, he scrambles them all off the hook like a flustered cat, but he delivers the film's moral knockout when he somberly tells his erstwhile employer, "You're worse than the rest of them, Danny. They don't know no better. You're worse than all of them." He's speaking of the fleecing of Arthur Winant, a 24-karat maroon played by Don DeFore with such guileless out-of-town-ness that just hooking him for a game should have been a crime, never mind actually rooking him for the cashier's check for $5000 that properly belonged to a sports club in L.A. One of the nicer, by which I mean nastier points of the screenplay by John Meredyth Lucas and Larry Marcus is the suggestion that while no one knew about the homicidal bruiser played by Mike Mazurki, Danny might still have risked it for the score. It almost succeeds in distracting the viewer from the conspicuous waste of Lizabeth Scott in the role of Fran Garland, effectively reprising her steadfast chanteuse from I Walk Alone (1947) in a needier, more submissive key. Whatever spirit she shows when she rebukes Danny, "A girl walked out on you and you couldn't take it. But you'd take it out on me," doesn't last longer than it takes him to turn a night walk by the skeletally fog-wrapped cranes of the river into a grim meditation on the Styx. The inevitable law rounds out the story in the laconically amused person of Dean Jagger's Captain Garvey, but its real fuels are sleaze and paranoia, the audience sweating it out with its doomed characters. We can see for ourselves the onyx ring which is the signature of the killer, unnoticed in the play of spotlights across the club floor where every other man's face pops out to Danny as a potential assassin. The murders themselves are staged with trapdoor spider shock, as inescapable as if the death of one brother really conjured the other like some tulpa of revenge. With this setup chewing its nails off, Dark City doesn't need anything beyond the commitment to run its payoff unflinchingly to ground. Wherever the second-act turn toward romantic melodrama came from, it should have stayed there.

The dark city of the title is never named. A single process shot and a line of dialogue suggest that it may be Chicago, but for all intents and purposes it is one of those uncanny spaces with neither joy nor love nor light, the slight, persistent artificiality of its dirt-sprayed sidewalks and redressed storefronts and hotel rooms hard-lit as black boxes only adding to its dreamlike sense of every and nowhere and the minute the plot relocates itself to the more realistically identifiable climes of Los Angeles and Las Vegas, it collapses like a soufflé. It's not just another world, it's another story as Danny in his desperation to put a face to the name of his stalker ingratiates himself with Arthur's widow in the guise of an insurance investigator and finds himself touched by another person's troubles for the first time since his wartime disillusion and disgrace. It is not the fault of Viveca Lindfors, whose Victoria Winant bears the insupportable burden of regenerating a selfish operator through sheer innocent niceness; it is not even the fault of the roller coasters of Ocean Park Pier or the planetarium at the Griffith Observatory, its harvester-legged old-school Zeiss projector rotating like science fiction through the night sky. The Capture (1950) managed a similar trick of guilt-edged bonding, but crucially it didn't try to keep its protagonist's secret from the woman falling for him across her husband's ghost. "The way you used me to save your own skin was bad enough, but to come here and make friends with Billy—after murdering his father—" Especially since the whole heart-twisting imposture doesn't even pan out except to confirm that the faceless Sidney Winant is a psycho, which could perhaps have been hypothesized from his serial killer's flair for the ritual, it feels like even more of a digression than the average love angle, the stuff of a film in its own right or a cute spitball that should have been excised in draft. Even changing the scenery for the neon frontage of the Las Vegas Strip does not straighten out the narrative, as much of a relief as it is to discover the diminutive, newly dapper Soldier thriving as the pit boss for an old pal from his welterweight days—after he slyly arranges an audition for Fran, Danny grants him the rueful compliment, "Soldier's the most practical Cupid I've ever met." None of this material is unwatchable, especially as it edges its way back from sun-kissed suburbia toward the fringes of the underworld, but neither does it ever regain the grip and momentum of its opening scenes. The poker game that killed Arthur Winant is played in traditional stages, the build-up, the convincer, the blow-off, his fresh-faced confidence slowly dissolving in flop sweat as his breezy win of the night before slips through his fingers with the rest of his life. The stakes-setting murder which follows draws itself out like shudder pulp, complete with the decoy of a spring-loaded cat before the real horror erupts into the failed, banal protective circle of paperbacks and whiskey. Captain Garvey does his best to impress the danger of his situation on Danny with a remarkably sick little parable about the industrial slaughtering of sheep. I don't need all of my noir to be full-blown creepshows, but Dark City starts with such determination to fulfill its title, any deviation from its dead-ahead premise almost immediately dissipates all of its tension, the very tight plot uncoiling into frayed ends. In fairness, it sticks the landing of a deep-shadowed, bone-crunching fight scene in which Heston holds about as much of his own as can be expected against one-time professional wrestler and real-life whip-smart Mazurki, but it still feels as though it shouldn't have taken so many detours to get its antihero to the brink of redemption if it kills him.

Thanks to the photography of Victor Milner and the direction of William Dieterle, Dark City never looks negligible even in its literally lighter passages, but it really shines in the shadows, the translucent half-world of the id come out to play. It's hard to argue with its stated moral, "You can't live without getting involved," but more of its best lines are brush-offs like Danny's "Playing cards with you two is like washing your feet with your socks on," or the simple way that Soldier with a hammer in his hand from rechaining the front door looks at Augie who keeps calling him—mean, motor-mouthed, no sense of self-preservation—"Punchy." Given a star-making introduction under the titles, Heston has to run his part more on charisma than sympathy and does so well by its weak, abrasive spots, he might have been wasted on heroes. Also glimpsed intriguingly in the credits is Ketti Frings, though I like to think the women of Dark City would have been at least two-and-a-half-dimensional if the writer of The Accused (1949) and The File on Thelma Jordon (1950) had had more of a hand in the proceedings than "Adaptation by." If nothing else, it offers the novelty of a Hal Wallis Paramount noir without Wendell Corey—he must have been off at MGM shooting Harriet Craig (1950). It can be streamed through the usual suspects, but frankly I went with the Internet Archive and do not feel cheated that I recognized some of its urban topography from other noirs of the same vintage. It's the blinds in the office and the bend of the street. "It's a big city." – "It's a dirty mess." This card brought to you by my practical backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Rotwang)
I am sure it did my physical health no favors to stay up late with an old serial of Doctor Who (1963–), but the mental health benefits of watching Sylvester McCoy face down a tough crowd of gods with misdirection and timing are incalculable.

Dark carnivals are older than Ray Bradbury, Charles Finney, or even Robert Wiene, but The Greatest Show in the Galaxy (1988) may have the edge on metafiction with the insatiable audience of its Psychic Circus, a sort of austerity Nielsen family impassively consuming crisps and popcorn as they rate the gladiatorial parade of desperate or starstruck acts, among them a sly intergalactic explorer, his youthful companion light-years from her planet, and an earnest anorak of a superfan still chattering about his complete memorabilia right up until the ringmaster picks his melted glasses out of the grease spot of his failed turn in the spotlight. Grounded in the desert wastes of Segonax, the circus which used to be an emblem of freedom and imagination has been parasitized into a blood-engine of amusement on demand, cannibalizing punters and performers alike: "So long as you entertain us, you may live. When you no longer entertain us, you die." The conceit could only feel more on the nose if it had aired for the program's untimely cancellation rather than the finale of its next-to-last-until-revival season.

Fortunately for metaphor, The Greatest Show in the Galaxy has more than self-satire going for it. Beyond the Doctor-companion parody, T. P. McKenna's Captain Cook makes a wickedly funny foil in his own right, a crashing colonial fossil whom even death cannot prevent from perpetrating one more long-winded, self-aggrandizing anecdote of his exotic travels, while the "unusual little specimen" of Jessica Martin's Mags, so initially docile for her punk-streaked Goth-chic, turns out the kind of recklessly delightful ally with whom Sophie Aldred's Ace, even without a good rucksack's worth of Nitro-9, can take on killer clowns with laser beams and high-kick a zombie at the endless eye of a well. The truculent stallholder played by Peggy Mount leaves off crabbing about vagabond riff-raff and hippie weirdos and beams in approval at Gian Sammarco's Whizzkid in his chipper jumper and bow tie until this Carter-esque innocent on a bicycle, too, asks her the way to the Psychic Circus. "Everyone who's up to no good goes there. We locals wouldn't touch it with a barge pole." When it was still the pride and delight of the star-ranging circus folk whose merry prankster bus weathers among the dunes like the sold-out promises of the '60's, her disdain might have come off as plain conservative prejudice; under the new management of the Sunday-suited, stone-faced trio in the otherwise deserted stands, it is obviously the forewarning of a horror film. Whatever permeates the candy-floss posters and canvas-swathed shadows of the circus, it has split the original troupe between those like Ricco Ross' Ringmaster and Deborah Manship's Morgana who enable its mechanism out of survival and those who have been destroyed in resisting it, like the tragic lovers of Dee Sadler's Flowerchild and Christopher Guard's Bellboy or the even farther gone case of Chris Jury's Deadbeat, a broom-pushing burnout whose cryptic mumblings veer off in fright from the fortune-teller's crystal ball as if he's glimpsed in it something even more fearful than the Hanged Man her pack turned up for the Doctor. Most willing of all its servants is the baleful harlequin of Ian Reddington's Chief Clown, whose Glasgow-grinning whiteface and delicate double-voiced gestures seem designed to induce coulrophobia in anyone who didn't enter the big top with it, like Ace who had to be half-cajoled, half-dared past her touchy reluctance to take a chance on the Psychic Circus. "I've never liked clowns," she declares, which feels like a joke in itself considering who she's traveling with. From his introduction trying to teach himself out of Juggling for the Complete Klutz through the finale where the transparent patter of conjuring tricks turns suddenly to the real thing, as old and strong as an amulet snatched up through a smash of illusions, the serial showcases the quirky, slapstick side of the Seventh Doctor which cannot be separated from his restless, dangerous responsibilities, murmuring as a wind of chaos picks up around him, "Things are beginning to get out of control quicker than I expected." He rattles an optimistic tattoo on a pair of spoons, blinks at a ball that went up and never came down, drops all of his juggling clubs at the blasé revelation that a successful performance only means "you last longer." His Tarot card comes true, but he might as accurately have drawn the Fool strolling out to the brink of disaster, the Magician with his mountebank's table of props. Accused of being an old hippie himself, he flashes a self-deprecating peace sign. Despite the climactic identification of its antagonists as the "Gods of Ragnarok," the serial makes little use of Norse myth beyond the visual name-drop of runestones demarcating the boundaries between layers of time, but I might have to waive my firelike default of Loki to accommodate a dark-haired little man with a paisley scarf and a Panama hat and a funny umbrella not breaking stride as a dread realm self-destructs behind him, the trickster who brought down the house. "La commedia è finita!"

The Greatest Show in the Galaxy was written by Stephen Wyatt, directed by Alan Wareing, and part of the tantalizing, short-circuited continuity of script editor Andrew Cartmel, and if its pacing is odd—the first of its four episodes plays more like a prologue than a slow burn, while its ending wraps up so fast it seems to be missing more than one beat—its production design is wonderful. Instead of a safe distanced gloss of futurism, it jumbles itself up with displaced components of the past like one of the unmooring soundscapes that Mark Fisher loved to write about, a confused and curdled nostalgia. We can be treated to the iconically sfnal sight of the pennants of the Psychic Circus fluttering against a cloudless sky in which a ringed planet ghosts like a daymoon, topped almost to camp by the addition of an alien biker gunning his space hog toward the tent like a hard rock album cover, but the circus itself is trapped in a degraded loop, as slightly unreal as if reconstructed from Ace's childhood memories of "kids' stuff" that was at once "naff" and "boring" and "creepy." A hearse full of white-faced clowns isn't scarier just because some of them are robots, but their use of colorful kites to hunt down desperate fugitives makes the sense of a nightmare, painted eyes staring down out of the sun. The ringmaster raps and freestyles echt '80's, but the robo-conductor which guards the derelict bus recites as it strangles intruders, "Any more fares, please? Hold tight, please. Ding, ding," like a murderbot by Flanders and Swann. Behind the billowing curtains are stones as old as shed blood, and behind the stones? Ace and the Doctor arrive at the circus thanks to a piece of mechanical junk mail which materializes inside the TARDIS to project its canned spiel, but they'll walk away from it only because a nazar of blue and white glass functions exactly as it folklorically should. The effect is an unsettling collage, recognizably put together wrong. No wonder the gods in their human guises look like the dead hand of a squarer age of TV. The worst fate the circus reserves for its victims is not obliteration, but conformity: "That's what you like, isn't it? Taking someone with a touch of individuality and imagination and wearing them down to nothingness in your service." Even the Doctor, we are warned by someone who should know, can't hold out forever against their hunger, their boredom, and their fickle, vaporizing tastes. And yet the story doesn't feel like it's meant to wound its audience, the one on the other side of the fourth wall or the Internet Archive as the case may be; it feels like double-speaking, which is what Seven does best, no less weird and entertaining for what it might be warning between the lines. The Doctor does an escape act. Ace activates a half-dismantled robot with the characteristically resourceful and violent mutter, "This thing had better work or I'll kick its head in." There are stilt-walkers and an astonishing request for an unissuable ticket in double time. Even around the inevitable quarry, the location shooting looks odd and dry and real. I imagine I would like a poster for the tour of the Boreatic Wastes, but I'll pass on the early collection of Ganglion pottery. This imagination brought to you by my local backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Otachi: Pacific Rim)
Robert Eggers' The Lighthouse (2019) remains one of my odder experiences of cinema, like seeing so many of my own touchstones set out in a stranger's configuration—a densely allusive, richly imagistic maritime pas de deux in which dreams, secrets, and dooms fold into one another like the tide booming on the gull-mewed black ledges which afford scarce room for the peeling buildings of a station, let alone the fractious demons of the men supposed to tend its light, yet more absurdist and aggro than its maledictions of Neptune and talk of seabirds as lost sailors' souls would traditionally suggest. It has the numinous, shape-changing sea; it also has plenty of slime. I like to think it would have given Lovecraft the screaming mimis.

Originally sparked by Edgar Allan Poe with an infusion of Smalls Lighthouse, The Lighthouse draws on the tragedy in the loosest sense of a weird and grisly fate befalling two lightkeepers—wickies, in the late nineteenth century Downeast vernacular of the profane and literate screenplay by Robert and Max Eggers—named Thomas, although by the time the film discloses this information it feels less historically indebted than sympathetically inevitable. Its sea-haunting doesn't miss a trick, beginning well past realism with the blare of a foghorn like a sounding leviathan even before it shows us the tender steaming across a silver shagreen of sea, ferrying the latest pair of keepers to their four-week stint on this stark, remote light. They are sinewy, scour-boned, an old salt and his green assistant who look sometimes like kin, sometimes like incomprehensible strangers, sometimes like scratched tin reflections of the same man and are played by Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson as though either of them might turn out to be his shadow. Badger-bearded and ship-tattooed, Tom Wake declaims the laws of the station like a preacher under sail, his grizzled authority self-contradicted by his meandering malice and his habit of ripping farts for emphasis. With something more than the territorialism of seniority, he warns, "I tend the light . . . The light is mine." Tom Howard who was hired as Ephraim Winslow stews tight-lipped over his back-aching menial duties of stoking and swabbing and whitewashing the tower, his mustache bristling as pugnaciously as his eyes flicker away. Late of the Hudson's Bay Company, he explains his turn to seaward, "I ain't the kind to look back at what's behind him, see?" But then he might not have to, when the ghosts of his time in the Canadian woods make such natural bedfellows with the kind of sea-soaked fancies said to have driven the assistant keeper before him to a madman's grave. No sooner has the younger Tom settled to his mattress than he finds secreted among its horsehair the well-thumbed scrimshaw of a mermaid, a harbinger or perhaps a portrait of the apparition he will stumble across on his resentful rounds of slops and coal—pale as pearl-shell, rockweed-veiled, she looks like a shipwreck's inconnue; then his hand uncovering her cold breasts discovers the roughening slits of scales and ventral fins, she is the mermaid who swam through his dream of a white-headed body floating among logs like coffins and as he blunders back from her in horror, she jackknifes up from the wet black rocks to jeer him in the voice of a gull. The foghorn swallows his scream. Is it gaslighting when the elder Tom claims that weeks have passed since their relief failed to show in the nor'easter that the barometer is still falling from, or has time merely slipped like the spaces of the lantern room where he can be seen paying homage to its Fresnel splendor in his naked skin? When the younger Tom spied on him, he saw something like a tentacle slithering through the shifting blaze that the older man saluted as "me beauty . . . a finer, truer, quieter wife than any a live-blooded woman." The longer their shift wears on, the more these jags and intimations of the supernatural accrete like nacre, but what's their grit? The guilt of one man, the longing of another? Some radiation of the light itself? Perhaps it is only that classic combination, what you bring to what you find, in which case it's best not to think what it means to be the catalyst: that anyone else might have gotten away.

Like its predecessor in New England old weirdness, The Lighthouse handles its ambiguities honestly: it isn't interested in mystification so much as the point where explanations cease to help. Knowing our Coleridge and Homer, we have no difficulty believing that the killing of the one-eyed seagull changed the wind, raised the storm, called the strangeness out of the wave-wrapped rock, but it makes no difference what will expiate it if the two Toms come to grief on their own recognizance before then. Never as straightforward as mere enmity, their relationship swirls between the adversarial, the familial, and the erotic, especially after the exchange of storm-ruined rations for a crate of grog uncorks confidences and vulnerabilities previously insinuated only through the safely masculine expressions of boasts or goads. The younger Tom bridles that he wasn't meant to work like a housewife, the elder Tom calls down a sea-god's curse over his unappreciated cooking. A moment of slow-dancing tenderness almost closes to a kiss which a bout of sodden fisticuffs averts, in whose aftermath the men rest in one another's arms as if it had been sex after all. Someone has chopped a hole in the lifeboat. Either someone has been doing some hard lying or reality has split like light through a catadioptric lens. "Where are we? Help me to recollect. Who're you again, Tommy?" Even as relations between the two men deteriorate like a Pinter play out of Whale Weekly, the film holds its weirdness in time with its psychodrama, reserving some of its most striking touches for its storm-bound, unraveling second half. Desperately clutching his scrimshaw fetish, the younger Tom masturbates in a welter of intrusive fantasies, the shark-flowered genitals of the stranded mermaid, a blond man's shoulders in a mackinaw jacket, a dripping tangle of tentacles and the jabbing point of a peavey, the siren's embrace pulling him into another man's death. Polyphemos does not figure by name among the script's copious classical allusions, but the lighthouse's single eye glares and blinks on the water, the one-eyed gull horribly recurs when a lobster pot hauled up from the foaming sea disgorges a human, one-eyed head. In a shot as unreal and arresting as our portrait-like introduction to the wickies proper, the younger Tom kneels in the grip of the elder, transfixed by a cyclopean beam of light straight out of Sascha Schneider's Hypnose (1904). It's scarier for being so tactile and imperfect, not some evanescence of spindrift and dread. So much of the film rests on this commingling of the workaday and the unearthly, the black comedy of bad roommates one second and the rip current of myth the next. Even its most violent scenes can vouchsafe shocks of strange beauty like a vision of the elder Tom as a coral-crowned, barnacle-breasted Old Man of the Sea, kraken-twining for the younger Tom's throat as brutally and sensuously as the mermaid slid her fingers into his mouth or the Canadian timberman punched him square on the nose. The dialogue ranges as deliberately between registers, its ornate language—credited in the closing titles to the influence of historical diaries, Herman Melville, and especially Sarah Orne Jewett—deployed in service of spellbinding invocation and surreal vulgarity. "You smell," the younger Tom pants in a veritable coloratura of turpentine-drunken invective, "like hot onions fucked a farmyard shithouse." Half-choked in the alien element of earth, his elder prophesies the judgment of the awful transcendence at the heart of the light:

"Ye wish to see what's in the lantern? So did me last assistant . . . Oh, what protean forms swim up from men's minds and melt in hot Promethean plunder, scorching eyes with divine shames and horror and casting them down to Davy Jones. The others, still blind, yet in it see all the divine graces and to Fiddler's Green sent where no man is suffered to want or toil, but is ancient, mutable, and unchanging as the she who girdles 'round the globe. Them's truth. You'll be punished."

In a coup of nerdiness and aesthetics, The Lighthouse was shot by Jarin Blaschke on black-and-white 35 mm film with lenses from the '30's, a custom-built orthochromatic filter, and Klieg levels of light poured onto the set, combining to a dark-grained, metallic effect of haze and austerity comparable to daguerreotypes and early film; the silent-to-sound transitional aspect ratio of 1.19:1 makes it look even more frame by frame like some lost curiosity of an alternate film industry. It is remarkably beautiful, which I do not say only because it is used to represent one of the best mermaids I have seen rendered on film, laughing like nothing human in her clinging wrack of hair. (Valeriia Karaman plays her as if the price of the scene was a drowned cameraman.) It is the kind of movie whose visible allusions leave the viewer wondering what echoes form the rest of the iceberg, like a trace of the Smuttynose murders in the late use of an axe or Peter Grimes in the accusation that the elder Tom murdered his previous wickie—watching the patterns coiling and breaking of chalk in black water, I thought the spell of Mana and the spell of Reck and the spell of Lir. Val Lewton would have approved of the visual as well as literary inspirations, although I'm not sure the dick jokes would have made it past RKO. The blasted, churning, discordant score by Mark Korven is intensely modern. I saw this movie originally at the Somerville Theatre with [personal profile] rushthatspeaks, but it has since made itself available on Kanopy. Its salt-encrusted rhyme of chanteys and nightmares may not suit all comers, but even when I am perhaps more oriented toward its nautical uncanny than its toxically masculine maelstrom, I am in fact the target audience for credits music of A. L. Lloyd's "Doodle Let Me Go (Yaller Girls)." The location shooting in Yarmouth, Nova Scotia deserves its own playlist. This plunder brought to you by my live-blooded backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Claude Rains)
Skeets Gallagher doesn't have to do anything to make me love him in Lightning Strikes Twice (1934). From the moment he sits up in Ben Lyon's bed with his silvery hair spiked out in all directions and his hangover audibly duking it out for supremacy with last night's lingering drinks, absentmindedly rolling two socks onto the same foot with poignant pointlessness as he fails to reconstruct the sequence of events which led from the floor show of a stag night to a bedroom strewn with confetti and a squeaky-faced balloon in a party hat tied to the foot of the bed, he is so archetypally the hero's dissipated friend that he can hang around kibitzing for as long as he feels like and I won't kick.

The film to which he belongs is an absolutely sterling example of inessential American cinema. It's a contract picture, populated by players who needed to fill up their dance cards for RKO; its premise hasn't altered since the days of New Comedy and its action only as a reflection on the shifting repertoire of stock characters across two thousand years; it doesn't have a plot so much as an escalation of lazzi and after about an hour the film runs out. One of the lazily irrepressible ne'er-do-wells of Depression-era escapism, Lyon's Steve Brewster has twenty-four hours to gain his flightily globe-trotting aunt's approval of his well-bred fiancée, make a good impression of his own on his naval officer of a prospective father-in-law, and successfully conceal his normal record of shenanigans from anyone with the capacity to call the banns off without a cent, a tall farcical order even without the complications of two grifting vaudevillians, three apparent murders, and one very persistent reporter, not to mention the wild cards of the maniacal-looking character who darts periodically through the mise-en-scène with gun in hand and the couple of policemen who have become glumly lost in the sewers of Pasadena. One presumes that only through an oversight on the part of screenwriters Joseph Fields and John Grey were none of the characters stolen in infancy by pirates. In compensation, Gallagher's Wally elevates the facepalm to a kind of interpretative dance while Laura Hope Crews' Aunt Jane is nothing but charmed by the phony versions of Judy and Captain Nelson even when Pert Kelton's Fay comes down to dinner in a squiffed version of her fan dance and Walter Catlett's Gus entangles himself in his aiguillettes while belting out such maritime malaprops as "I'm so empty, my mizzenmast is poking a hole through my jib sail." The authentic Judy is portrayed by Thelma Todd, enabling her to deliver in her most refined accents of disappointment the reproachful antimetabole, "I wanted a husband with the virtues of a lover, not a lover with the vices of a husband." The picture was produced in the freshly Code-enforcing latter half of '34, but it doesn't seem to have noticed from the breezy way it lets Gus assume that a present from Paris is a French postcard or Fay moan after a supposed car accident that she's broken "two ribs and eight commandments." Chick Chandler's Marty Hicks springs indefatigably after his story only for the detective about to go undercover as a missing butler to warn him off with a growled "I was solving murders when you were in three-cornered pants." As the original Nelsons bear down on Steve without a word from his itinerant aunt, a moderately reconstituted Wally dashes a spoonful of orange juice into his hair of the dog and offers so casually it's a crime the film doesn't take him up on it, "I'll sub for Aunt Jane."

Skeets Gallagher, who was occasionally credited by his given name of Richard, falls into the category of character actors for whom I have a great affection without actually having seen them in very much. In The Racket (1928), he plays a reporter so vague and crocked, with just the right wicked and whimsical air that if the film hadn't premiered a full two months after the publication of Frederick Nebel's "Raw Law," I would give him serious consideration as an inspiration and not merely dream casting for the character of Kennedy. In Possessed (1931), his society wastrel shares a glass of champagne with a discontented mill-town Joan Crawford and in a rare moment of sobriety encourages her to exploit the men she meets for all they're worth like Baby Face (1933) without the Nietzsche, cheerfully refusing to mentor her any further: "The East River is full of girls who took advice from men like me." Pale-haired and plaintively browed, he could have played the White Rabbit without the elaborate costume in the star-studded, live-action Alice in Wonderland (1933). His introduction in Lightning Strikes Twice is one of its nicest pre-Code throwbacks, as Steve comes to consciousness equally minus his recall of the previous night; apprehensively disentangling a sheer stocking from around his neck, he registers the heap in the quilts beside him, peels back the covers in trepidation of a feminine form whose name he will be expected to remember, and at the sight of another man asleep in his pajamas sighs in unfeigned relief, "You had me scared for a minute!" Prevented once again from relapsing into the pillows, Wally regards his morning person of a best friend with understandable acid: "I might add that your high spirits are very depressing." Plotwise, he contributes the brainwave of trying to scare Aunt Jane off the fraudulent Nelsons by bribing Gus to throw a fit in the middle of dinner—it takes an extra $50 for the old trouper to agree to the climactic spin on the ear—but he's far more indispensable to the preposterous atmosphere, wincing and ducking and blurting with ever-diminishing, Buñuelian optimism, "I want to go home." At one point in tandem with Steve, he simply hides, not very effectively, behind a couch.

Directed and co-conceived by Ben Holmes with Marion Dix, Lightning Strikes Twice should on no account be confused with a good movie, which is irrelevant to its value as a comedy of nonsense. It starts on a dark and stormy night when suddenly a scream rings out. One of its most valuable supporting players is a black cat to whom I am pleased to report nothing bad happens at all. Describing it as a mystery-comedy suggests that it remembers about its bloodstained overcoat and missing person more consistently than it does, but describing it as a romantic comedy suggests that it regards the inevitable union of Steve and Judy as more than a set of goalposts to be moved for as long as new gags can be crammed in front of them. It is a great showcase for wisecracks. Gus whistles over a diamond bracelet, "Blow the man down, lady, that certainly is a cargo of ice," and boasts of his bogus daughter's specialty, "When she's really what you call accomplished, she don't use no fans." Worried that the reportage of murder will unnerve his aunt, Steve is immediately reassured by Wally that "she never reads anything but the society column," and then, truthfully, "and Popeye." At a fleeting moment of dramatic tension, Judy promises not to leave Steve while he's in trouble, prompting the world-class romantic double-speaking of "Darling, then you'll never leave me." I am horrified that I cannot locate this picture for free on the internet as opposed to Watch TCM when the Internet Archive furnishes me with much classier movies every day. If you can get hold of it, have fun with whatever strikes you as worth it. Skeets Gallagher is good enough for me. This cargo brought to you by my accomplished backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Haruspex: Autumn War)
I have no idea what inspired Darryl F. Zanuck to put a stripped-down survival thriller rather than a more obviously eye-popping feature into production as the first and only flirtation of Twentieth Century-Fox with the mid-century craze for 3-D, but it makes me regret that I will never see Inferno (1953) with its vistas of desert air stereoscopically receding. It's formally experimental pulp, a kind of open-air chamber noir in Technicolor yet—slightly more populated than a one-man show, anchored in the grit of red sandstone and the blue haze of mountains and the gnarled green spikes of Joshua trees. It may not be the main attraction that Robert Ryan isn't once racist to anyone, but it doesn't hurt.

Warning, reads the rust-blotched sign at the dirt road's side, the sage-silvered Mojave stretching lone and level behind it. Do not attempt this route without ample supplies of water, gas – oil. We may therefore wonder what the tensely elegant woman and the drably methodical man are doing out here with their abandoned horse trailer and their strewn fifths of whiskey and their carefully spaced tracks; the answer is committing a crime. It isn't much of a crime, but then they aren't much of a couple—three nights into an affair begun on a mining survey, Gerry Carson (Rhonda Fleming) and Joe Duncan (William Lundigan) have taken impulsive advantage of a riding accident to ditch her husband in the middle of the desert with a broken leg, promising to return with help and intending no such thing. "It's not like killing him, exactly," she uncertainly justifies the false trail they have laid to mislead the search-and-rescue they will have to risk initiating in order to maintain an appropriate appearance of concern. "More just—not saving him." Her partner has fewer illusions, about the desert or themselves: "It's killing him, all right." If it weren't for the names in the credits, we might expect never to see this guaranteed dead man, only the effects of his murder on these uneasy lovers and their mutually curdling whim of bad romance, a study in guilt baking under the Southwestern sun. Luckily for the more than noir mechanics of this story, the hundred and ten in the shade of the title is just as much Gary Paulsen country as James M. Cain, however much it doesn't look it from the rustically adobe-toned lounge of a dude ranch or the tiles of a pool shimmering like a mirage in turquoise. From the stony scrub of the hillside where Donald Whitley Carson IIII (Ryan) is testing his marksmanship against his drinking and screaming to make the rimrock clap back, "Where are they?" it looks like a short sharp exhibition of buzzard bait.

"Just don't think about it, baby," Joe soothes a restive Gerry as they settle in for the drive back to Los Angeles, out of the dry, iron-stained rain shadow in which the sheriff was relieved to reassure her no signs of her errant husband had been found. "He didn't suffer any longer than he wanted to. He was bound to know it was hopeless pretty quick and he had the pistol." It so happens that the lovers have underestimated their victim, but within Hollywood limits, screenwriter Francis Cockrell and director Roy Ward Baker don't make it easy on him. In the parlance of seven decades in his future, Don Carson is a failson. A millionaire by inheritance, he's never done much with it besides play so inefficiently at being a tycoon that his secretaries refer to his desk as "the bottleneck," earning himself instead a reputation for bad temper, binge drinking, and pulling a vanishing act at such capriciously irresponsible intervals that it dawns like the first self-awareness of his life that he set himself up beautifully for his own murder. He's used to letting his credit rating take up space for him, griping about the helicopter he imagined his wife must have had trouble chartering him, "I told her to buy one if she couldn't." Wasting his ammunition out of boredom, fretfully slopping his water once he's run through his booze, he looks like Outward Bound's Least Likely to Succeed. Even the family lawyer who retains a regretful, exasperated affection for his difficult charge damns him with a one-percenter's epitaph: "If he hadn't grown up with so much money in a world where it has such power, he might have been quite a guy." The knowledge that he'll pull himself together sooner or later or we're facing a really short movie doesn't make it any less fun to watch Ryan who was six foot three with a stoker's shoulders and a face like one of the canyon's time-calved crags so easily convince us of his character's overgrown flimsiness that even his clumsiest moves toward self-preservation come as a cautious surprise. Carson proves his nerve when he sets his own leg with the improvised traction of a wedge of boulders and his resourcefulness when he splints it with tent pegs and strips of sleeping bag, but the inspiration to cannibalize the leather of his satchel for a pair of flat mitts to keep himself from scooching his hands bloody on the brick-dust scree is our first sign that this big hollow man might actually be smart: not a sufficient asset in itself, of course, to compensate for the hot equations of the desert, but it'll help a lot more than mere stubbornness or even spite. "Just because I never had to do anything like this doesn't mean I can't," the day-burnt millionaire encourages himself as he prepares to rappel down the broken cliff face with a rope that used to be a tent and a foot he can't put any weight on, after which he can look forward to working himself across miles of boulders and creosote well beyond the limits of his meager supplies. "I'll show them . . . I'll get out of here. And when I do, they'll be the sorriest pair that ever . . ." Neither his determination nor his ingenuity endears him to the audience so long as both are driven by revenge, especially since it manifests in mean-spirited fantasies of luring his unfaithful wife and her lover into the wilderness and stranding them even more cruelly than they did him. Instead and charmingly, we start to like him in his own right rather than as a matter of narrative protocol because his internal monologue is a hell of a lot less tough. I love it, actually, which I cannot say of most voiceovers in any genre. It's wry, interactive, self-undercutting, each macho move matched by a skeptical second thought. "It can't hurt forever," Carson stoically assures himself as he sets about fashioning his splint, then adds as if remembering that the jolt of the bonesetting laid him out cold, "Probably." Dry-mouthed, he experimentally pops a couple of pebbles to suck on, wonders with brief self-congratulation, "Did I read that somewhere?" and concludes, "Tastes like I made it up." His sense of humor emerges with his awareness of just how blued and tattooed he is when it comes to the most basic skills of wilderness survival, which he never bothered to learn even as he gallivanted around mountain trails and manganese claims. "Goodbye, lunch," he sighs as a dove flitters off through the rust-colored rocks, in no danger from his careful wild shot. A billfold in the desert is extra weight at best, but so is an ego.

Inferno is not some indomitable story of man overcoming nature; the desert is explicitly not to be overcome. "You got to go along with her—but you can count on her if you do." Carson has to acknowledge that he's more fragile than he's always boasted before he can learn that he's more capable than he's always feared and the process is full of neatly observed and not always predictable setbacks. The suspense of the canyon wall is not only whether his rag-braided rope will hold from ledge to ledge, but what he'll do if his improvised anchor doesn't come loose when he needs it for the next stage of his descent. By the time he's down to the last two bullets in his gun, every animal that hops or browses through his field of view is a complicated cost-benefit calculation, not neglecting such factors as limited mobility and coyotes. Viewers with more experience of the desert may feel like shouting as he despairs of dying of thirst in full view of a stand of barrel cactus. All of these sequences are staged economically, elementally, without a tug of melodrama except when Carson falls prey to it himself, sick with hunger and failure and not really consoling himself with a daydream of accusing his murderers from beyond the grave which loses its luster as soon as he has to think about the logistics of scavengers and cairns, but it is just this depression which blossoms into the exultant distraction of realizing that the sandy wash in which he's propped will be a pool in springtime, a rhapsody of imagined waterfalls and mist that draws the heartfelt reverie, "Must remember. Always visit desert in the spring." Even before it inspires him to excavate a makeshift well, once again attentive to the physical minutiae of muscles and angles and slowly roughening sand so that by the time he's got it walled with small stones, we understand it took more than a few scrapes to make an oasis, it marks the first time Carson has thought of the desert as a place of beauty as opposed to an arid obstacle course of protracted agonies and death. Certainly we find it more beautiful than the creature comforts in which Gerry and Joe immerse themselves like mannequins of the Southwestern style, their Fiesta-gold coffee cups and swimsuits of gilt and azurite and tall cool lemon fizzes intercut for maximum contrast with dust-bearded, sun-blistered Carson nursing his fires, hiking on his old mine-timber crutch; he isn't more authentic, though by now his dirt-browned clothes and sage-green bedroll blend him like camouflage whenever he leans against a Joshua tree, but he's stumbled into a peace their anxious machinations have left them no room for, canvassing the desert like vultures for a man whose death they mean to be sure of this time. As their never more than passing attraction bleeds out like oil from the guts of a Lincoln Capri, Carson muses to the first human person he's met in more than a week, "Funny. I probably wouldn't have even gotten out of there except for thinking what I was going to do to them. But now, somehow, they seem kind of unimportant." Ryan got so few chances in his movies to smile as beautifully and generously as he does in this kerosene-lit moment, not even at his own expense: "I do, too."

The climax oversteps; after widening naturally into a spiral of irony as unstressed as a Kesh's heyiya-if, the action doesn't escalate so much as it's kicked through the roof, just as if an executive—I wouldn't put it past Zanuck—had rung up at the last minute and ordered more fistfights, explosions, and objects flying toward the camera. It feels damn near cut in from some other film, an insult to the mordant, poetic editing of Robert Simpson. Fortunately, Inferno rights itself in its final scene with an encounter by the roadside where all its troubles began, ending without drama, merely the quiet recognition of change. Throughout it looks spectacular, photographed by Lucien Ballard with full advantage of natural light and the shadows of these red rocks and the bodies of its cast who can reveal just as much with the tightening grip of a glass or the lowering of a pair of a binoculars as with a limping, self-amused shrug. Flame-haired as if the title means her, Fleming contributes more than ornamentation as the dissatisfied wife with too much conscience for murder and not enough for mercy, a sort of failed throw at a femme fatale. I gather that Lundigan was almost chronically a straight arrow, but he's so effective as a crew-cut snake—sandy-lashed, his college boy's smile both wicked and weak—that I can't believe Follow Me Quietly (1949) wasted him as a cop. Larry Keating and Henry Hull turn in complementary support as the pensive lawyer and an old-time desert rat respectively, but it's Ryan's film and he carries it without ever looking like a job of capital-A acting whether he's angrily failing to potshot an empty or chewing on a torn rag of water like a fisher king healed. It's so nice to see him as the hero for a change and believable that he does not start out that way. I appreciate that as he gathers the little sun-blackened strips of jerky that used to be the deer he butchered with his pocketknife between scenes, he has been on his own officially long enough to try out the terrible joke, "Bartender, draw me a short deer." Every time he sets a hopeful signal fire, the modern viewer may scream at him not to burn down the Mojave. The rain arrives with the exact timing of the conservation of irony. Lastly, for audiences who like their desert movies to come with an intermission, Inferno obliges and it's nowhere near three hours long. You can pause it any time on the Internet Archive and run for the water fountain then. This spring brought to you by my first-class backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
It will sound like either a euphemistic warning or damnation with faint praise if I describe The Well (1951) as the least typical drama about race relations I have seen from its era, but its no-frills, no-stars, resourcefully no-budget B-filmmaking doesn't just hold a candle to some of its more prestigious contemporaries, it leaves them looking like cautious antiquities when it bluntly eschews white saviors, saintly victims, and most importantly bothsidesism in its depiction of a small town brought to the brink of a race riot. The spark to the tinder of this placidly representative, integrated community is a mistaken case of interracial stranger danger, but it almost doesn't matter. It could have been a whistle, a zoot suit, the economy. It's America; that coal seam is always burning somewhere.

Co-written by Russell Rouse and Clarence Greene, co-produced by Greene and Leo C. Popkin, and co-directed by Popkin and Rouse, The Well may not be revolutionary cinema, but it's doing its best to be real. Because the audience knows from the start that five-year-old Carolyn Crawford (Gwendolyn Laster) was not kidnapped, molested, or murdered by the unknown white man who was seen buying her a bunch of violets and holding her hand—like the echo of Kathy Fiscus, she's at the bottom of an abandoned well in the field of wildflowers she was dawdling through on her way to school—the alacrity with which the underlying tensions of a bucolic everyburg flash over into rumor-milled vigilantism risks resembling an obvious parable of monsters on Maple Street, but the film is scrupulous in its illustration of the stages by which the racial amity of the town understandably and upsettingly breaks down. Affronted by the suggestion of calling in the state militia, one white member of the citizens' committee protests, "Negroes and whites have been living together in complete harmony for years!" That the sentiment is more than Caucasian back-patting is supported by the casual mingling of Black and white residents at school, on the job, even in the meeting in the mayor's office. Nevertheless and without pieties, the audience is tipped to sympathize with the Black perspective on the contingent nature of such harmony. To a man, the town's law enforcement is white. Why wouldn't Martha and Ralph Crawford (Maidie Norman and Ernest Anderson) worry that their dark-skinned darling won't be as much of an amber alert as an equally flower-loving little white girl, especially once the involvement of a white man hits the grapevine? Why wouldn't it sharpen rather than allay their fears when the man is identified as Claude Packard (Harry Morgan), the visiting nephew of local leading citizen Sam Packard (Barry Kelley)? White women cluck over the shock of a child-murdering maniac in their midst, but Black men are laying odds on his release within half an hour of his arrest. The communal suspicion that Packard will pull whatever strings it takes to keep his nephew out of jail is not ill-founded when we can watch the businessman throwing his weight around, threatening the sheriff's office with legal action and trying to browbeat his nephew into perjuring himself in the meantime. As Black mistrust and white defensiveness polarize around the Packards, despite the lawful scruples of Sheriff Ben Kellogg (Richard Rober) we are given ever less reason to doubt the claim that rises out of the choral voices of the town, "You can get away with murder as long as you're the right color." Just by not sugarcoating its history, the film can look horribly prescient. "This is a unique situation," a Black student (Elzie Emanuel) observes at a point in the day when he and his friends can still hang out at the library with white patrons coming and going in the stacks behind them. "A white man's accused of a crime against a Negro child. This time, the shoe's on the other foot." He doesn't need to elaborate on the hysteria of miscegenation contained in that other shoe. The town's white population has been on edge ever since the telephone of gossip transformed a desperate jostle during a confrontation with Packard into a savage beating of the helpless white man, but the actual trigger for fighting in the streets is a white woman's self-serving claim to have been "insulted" just so her boyfriend can prove his chivalrous bona fides by bashing the first Black man he and his four buddies catch sight of. The N-word flies thicker and faster in this picture than in any other non-news media I have encountered of its time, but it isn't for shock value. Before the town begins to boil, its white characters use the politer terms of the day, "Negro" or "colored." The emergence of the slur marks a decisive shift toward the kind of mass violence described by Dr. Billings (Bill Walker) with such devastating candor that it carries the day for calling the governor for help:

"Has any of you ever seen a race riot? I have. I saw a whole town go mad, a town very much like this. I saw my own father's body tied to a car and dragged through the streets and the driver of that car was a man my father had known for twenty years. I saw a white child beaten to death by my own people. She was just about the age of your daughter, Mr. Lobel. Oh, you can't believe it unless you've seen it with your own eyes . . . It's something you can never forget as long as you live."

It should not feel like such a coup for an all-white writer-director-producer team that even though The Well doesn't get very far inside its Black characters—it doesn't get that far inside its white characters, to be fair—it takes care to present them both as individuals and as a community, an interrelated ensemble rather than select dramatic exceptions. We can believe in their families, their neighborhoods, their work friendships. "Tell him what kind of a break we'd catch if it was one of us," one deliveryman calls sardonically to another as their white coworker starts to argue devil's advocate. Most valuably for its subject matter, it never flattens its Black characters into virtuous objects or condemns them as equal aggressors as the violence engulfing their town spirals to scarier, wilder levels than most of post-war Hollywood would admit. Drivers are dragged from their cars, pedestrians narrowly dodge deliberate ramming. Black-owned businesses get bricks through the window, white-owned cars are trashed, impromptu gangs clash half-armed in the streets. The sheriff's orders to get Claude out of town for his own protection just get him roughed up at a roadblock and Bill Gaines (Alfred Grant) is mobbed by roving white men while somberly searching a nearby creek for traces of his still-missing niece. The production idealizes a tad from the real-life tendencies of race riots when it figures the police under Ben's leadership as a struggling force for peace and order, but it maintains its cold eye for inequalities: a Black teenager with a battered arm is booked as a grown man while his white assailants who evaded arrest are excused as "just kids." When one of Packard's warehouses is torched, the wealthy contractor rabble-rouses the town's disordered flares of white violence into a unified mob, cocked and aimed for a Tulsa-style massacre. "This is my town," he barks at the dogged sheriff, the rule of law eroding before our eyes in the rifles that bristle around Ben, point him out of Packard's office like an overstayed errand boy. "I'd rather destroy it than let those dirty black devils take it over . . . I'm going to drive them out even if I have to kill every mother's son of them." Thus when we witness the Black men of the town gathering with small arms of their own, as much as we can't cheer the furious heartbreak of Carolyn's father, uncle, and grandfather that sanctions their mobilization, neither can we dismiss the self-defense of their militancy. "Now listen, men. There's hundreds of them up there. But this time we're not running. This time we'll be waiting for them. For every one of us, there's going to be two dead ofays. Two," Gaines repeats in his deep earth of a voice, "for one." They are facing an existential threat, not the racist fantasy of one. It should not escape the audience that even as he works frantically to deputize as many citizens of whatever color as can be trusted to carry riot guns, Ben isn't stressing about Black revolution, he's snapping at the Mayor (Tom Powers), "Just tell me how I can stop Packard and that wild mob with a handful of deputies!"

Notably, the film does not point the finger at the press for inflaming the situation. Reporters are conspicuously absent from the churn of half-truths and anxieties around the disappearance of Carolyn Crawford; it is taken as read that ordinary citizens can be trusted to work up the necessary head of steam to turn on their neighbors all on their own. Instead, parallel scenes of news mutating through Black and white chains of transmission demonstrate the involvement of the town as a whole in creating the conditions for the conflagration, neatly sidestepping in the process another popular failure mode of stories about racism, the deflection of blame onto individual bigots instead of the systems which enable them. Packard sets the match, but the powder is all the white men and women who accepted and amplified an assumption of Black violence. The misinformation that spreads through the Black community is more a kind of stopped clock in reverse, a misconstruing of the available details that might as easily have been the truth. It matches the characterization, which insofar as it exists is never clear-cut. We know for a fact that Claude Packard is innocent, but he makes a bad showing as a suspect, his horror at the crime of which he's accused and his fear of being railroaded for it coming out in blurts of unconvincing belligerence, too easily boxed into losing his cool with the ever more bare-knuckled interrogations of the police—if we'd come in five minutes late, we might not believe him, either. Mid-century Morgan could play heavies and oddballs, a loyally murderous factotum in The Big Clock (1948), a half-daft deaf-mute in Moonrise (1948), a sleazetastic picture snatcher in Scandal Sheet (1952); a wry-faced, nerve-racked, transient miner doesn't cut the most prepossessing figure no matter his connections. His realization that his uncle doesn't believe him and doesn't care is one of the script's casually dispensed gut-punches: "Oh, I see. It doesn't matter whether I'm innocent or not. It doesn't matter what happened to that kid. Just protect the name of Sam Packard from any disgrace, that's all that matters!" Then again, we are encouraged to admire Ben Kellogg for his low-key, rugged integrity, the unimpaired efficiency with which he organized a search for a missing child of any color and persisted in the face of privileged obstruction and marginalized non-cooperation and was ready to put himself on the front lines of a race war to keep half his town from tearing the other half apart, and he doesn't give Claude a second thought of doubt even when the man stands off his powerful uncle and then folds up like yesterday's news. Rough around the edges as it is, The Well is confident enough in its audience's grasp of nuance to let characters we like be wrong. We are not intended to mistake Ralph Crawford for a bad father just because he's reluctant to be called away from the garage for the latest apparent instance of his little dreamer playing hooky: "It was hard enough to get a good job in this town and I don't want to lose it." Neither he nor his brother-in-law is trying to knock Packard down in the parking lot outside City Hall, but the combination of their urgency for news of Carolyn and his distaste to get away from their dark, hurt, scandalous faces is not fatal, not even bruising, but in the incendiary atmosphere after the arrest, a disaster. Everything happens too messily and too fast for anyone to see the real shape of it, sharp as blood coming up under a slap. It is part of what sells the turn of the film which might otherwise slew out of pure wish-fulfillment with the news that Carolyn has been discovered in the dry well, still alive.

Mommy, I fell down. )

Although it won neither, it's a point in the Academy's favor that this independent production was nominated for two Oscars, one for Best Story and Screenplay—it lost to An American in Paris, which especially since its competitors included Ace in the Hole and Go for Broke! is mind-croggling—and the other for Best Film Editing, which it would have deserved just for the rescue sequences in which Chester Schaeffer's cutting timed to the most discordant, clangorous variations on the movie's otherwise overworked theme by Dimitri Tiomkin makes a gripping short documentary of earth-moving, full of sliding pistons and welding sparks. The town itself was composited from location shooting in Marysville and Grass Valley and the use of local extras plus the clarity of the cinematography by Ernest Laszlo accentuates the effect of catching a breaking story, not a scripted one. It doesn't hurt the suspense that the latter stages of the rescue function as much like radio drama as film. All of that admitted, The Well is a really unvarnished picture and it does strike some false notes. Would any Black teens in the budding civil rights era really have debated the influence of "race prejudice" on the American legal system? It is not inherently stupid of the script to assign Ben a love interest in the form of pert diner proprietor Casey (Christine Larson), but it's embarrassing that it can't think of a way to communicate her anti-racism except by the comedy of over-peppering one bigot's combination salad and clouting another with a skillet when a mob comes for her short-order cook. The mix of professional and non-professional actors can be uneven; there are people in this film who can make two or three lines riveting and people who have trouble remembering their messenger speech. The two halves of the film hinge thematically together, but a montage does the heavy lifting of smoothing the seam. On the other hand, I love its threading of walk-ons through the sprawl of the narrative, like the unnamed student who recurs sometimes in the foreground of the audience's attention, sometimes part of the surrounding action, exactly as real people move through a world they share, and it knows when to isolate unexpected moments like the cat-eyed killer stare a young Black woman turns on the white truck that almost plowed her down. This movie is full of people who aren't protagonists and we're never in doubt that they're alive. It may be funny that Greene and Rouse are most famous for D.O.A. (1949) when, despite its oft-copied gimmick, it's the most conventional of their films of my experience to date. I got this one from YouTube and didn't foresee almost anything about it. It can't have done much business in the South. This harmony brought to you by my unique backers at Patreon.
sovay: (What the hell ass balls?!)
The Woman on Pier 13 (1949) was produced and unsuccessfully premiered as I Married a Communist and might as well have retained the original title for all the new one did to class up the joint. A pet project of Howard Hughes following his takeover of RKO in 1948, it's a hysterically ham-handed exposition of anti-Communist paranoia better suited to a speech by Joseph McCarthy than the B-minus noir whose destabilizing shadows it wraps around a narrative with the ideological nuance of toast points and an attention to character that gives agitprop a bad name. The effect it creates is fascinating, although not necessarily aspirational: its tough-minded wake-up call to an unsuspecting America is simultaneously binky-bonkers and boring.

In light of the legacy of the Second Red Scare, I cannot wish for this production to have been the critically persuasive and commercially profitable broadside it had every delusion of being, but it legitimately impresses me that it fails so hard. Paranoiacally speaking, anti-Communist film noir is a gimme. It's a tailor-made revelation of the world behind the world, the gnawing distrust of every familiar face and institution given concrete and yet elusive justification in the shape-shifting of a threat which can manifest out of the dearest and most banal touchstones of American life, the engulfing shadows waiting for the slightest of false steps as the apophenia of dread assumes the confirmation of conspiracy. Instead, the more stridently the film insists on the clear and present danger of its Red Menace, the more tacked on it feels. With minimal alterations in dialogue and none at all to the plot, The Woman on Pier 13—a more than usually meaningless title, not least because the Embarcadero in San Francisco where its Communist activity is concentrated is conspicuously lacking in a Pier 13—would play as a paint-by-numbers crime picture of the once-in-never-out school, as a newly married shipping executive finds himself blackmailed with the sins of his former life as a hot-headed longshoreman to deadlock an important round of negotiations between labor and management to the detriment of the waterfront and the benefit of the underworld figures who hold the paper on our hero's checkered past, who would frankly make more sense as racketeers than members of the Communist Party USA. Their strong-arm tactics are pure Black Mask, leavening extortion and intimidation with brazenly brutal murders and the obligatory blonde bait on tap. Instead of the respectable front of a downtown office, their headquarters are a classically criminal warehouse on the docks where a freight elevator gives onto a barren maze of catwalks by the light of the third degree and tower cranes stand silent witness to the black silk of the water closing for the last time over a squealer's head. The syndicate echoes are unmissable when the protagonist is peremptorily ordered to resume his Party dues by turning over two-fifths of his salary to the shell charity of "Mankind, Inc." Godfather-like, the Communist ringleader pronounces, "The Party decides who's out and when." It suits the film's political vacuity that its ostensible Reds never articulate or even allude to the ideals that make them such implacable opponents of democracy except in clichéd cracks like "What a wonderful advertisement for our American system of free enterprise," nor for all their patter about contacts and cells and indoctrination do we seem to catch them doing very much subversive or seditious. Their crimes are mostly concerned with disposing of their own for disloyalty at a rate that ironically suggests Stalinist purges less than McCarthyist witch-hunts. The waterfront tie-up is a MacGuffin, its purpose never explained even as its strategies are laid out; that one of them entails the infiltration of the ILWU produces the novelty of an anti-Communist, pro-union picture, but then the necessity of denying the intertwined histories of socialism and labor in the United States leads to the preposterous alarmism of "How would you like to see the Commies take over the union and dump it in the ashcan when they get through using it?" We are left to the tautological conclusion that it's bad because the Commies are behind it and the Commies are behind it because it's bad, a triumph for conspiracy theory and dramatically something of a dud. Unlike their successors in the full swing of the atom-obsessed 1950's, the Communists of The Woman on Pier 13 have no designs on government secrets, on political appointments, even on the apple pie of American values—judging by the scene in which their pet contract killer tries to chisel a little extra on top of his payoff for doing such a "nice neat job," they're as friendly to the laws of supply and demand as the next capitalist. At times their thuggishness feels left over not only from a gangster film but the Nazi saboteurs who menaced this self-same waterfront in the imagination of World War II, as if the film cannot conceive of a Soviet menace on American soil except through the pop culture of earlier paradigms of villainy. It denatures the fearmongering; it can't sustain the insistence that Communism is more than the latest craze of bogeyman. By the time the moll is snapping at her handler, "Emotion is something you're not built to understand or appreciate," it's hard to shake the suspicion that this film might have been less stupid if it had fast-forwarded to the science fiction and instead of mobsters they were all pod people or ants.

Not the least of the sins of The Woman on Pier 13 is squandering a cast that could have stocked a more than decent noir had they been given less shrilly monotonous material to work with. Cast against his political convictions, Robert Ryan plays the doomed Brad Collins né Frank Johnson without the apologetics of a friendly witness, rather the haunted determination of a betrayed idealist—perhaps as close to the conflicted history of a Depression-era activist on the far side of WWII as the Red-baiting pieties of the script would allow. Unafraid of the exposure of his Party record, unmoved by the reappearance of his lover from his Jersey agitator days, he capitulates only at the resurrection of a cold-case murder charge: "That shop steward who was killed in the street fight during that wildcat walkout . . . You remember that very well, don't you?" It's nice of the film not to oblige him to repudiate his past as a labor organizer which has made him such a trusted bridge between the owners and the workers of the Cornwall Shipping Company, but it treats his CPUSA membership like the proverbially wrong way of going after the right thing, which by the laws of HUAC and the PCA means he never had it to begin with. "I lost everything the day you walked in on me with that Party card." No such human affordances are permitted to mar the pulp ruthlessness of Vanning, the card-carrying kingpin whom the equally left-wing Thomas Gomez has to put over as a triple threat of agent, apparatchik, and Al Capone, one minute involved in surveillance worthy of J. Edgar Hoover, the next orchestrating the night's defenestration or hit-and-run, a man who seems to have no personality beyond the furtherance of his Party's schemes. Too businesslike for fanaticism, he nonetheless can't be accused of humorless socialist realism when he dismisses an objection as wearily as if he can't think of everything himself: "We'll tell you what to do. How you do it is your problem." As Jim Travis, representing the dockworkers, Richard Rober makes a solid job of the tough, sincere union man who can't understand why his old ally across the bargaining table has suddenly become the bosses' hardline mouthpiece, but John Agar as Don Lowry can do very little with his cautionary cartoon of a useful idiot who if he thinks at all, does it with his dick as he chases after the radicalizing charms of Janis Carter's Christine Norman, one of those Red ice queens who double as the specter of the sexually independent career woman—a photojournalist who uses her assignments as cover for her un-American activities—until she betrays her politics with her femininity by falling in love with her stooge and becomes punitively expendable, leaving only a carefully edited suicide note behind. The audience knew better when she passionately claimed, "Maybe it is possible to be Communists and still be human beings, too." It's all so cookie-cutter conservative that it's disappointing without being surprising that the film cheats Laraine Day's Nan Collins out of the perspective promised by both of its titles, sidelining her hurt and alienation in favor of Brad's moral agony, which makes it even weirder and more rewarding that she steps so confidently into the limelight of the third act for a brief turn as the heroine of the woman's picture this one doesn't otherwise even pretend to be.

It can't be an accident that the film's best sequence has nothing to do with Communism except in the sense that Nan is infiltrating the ring which has taken possession of her husband; it plays like an insert from a production which heard about characterization, ambiguity, even sexual tension once. Primed with the likely identity of her brother's killer by a grief-spiteful Christine, Nan goes after the man as unhesitatingly as a Woolrich heroine and finds him in his sleazo-violent element as the proprietor of a shooting gallery at Playland, putting his arm around a female customer to guide her aim with his signature pick-up line, "You need practice, baby, you need lots of practice." Played by William Talman in his screen debut and a jacket loud enough to clash with the midway's neon, Bailey's a tricky customer; we saw his dog-toothed smile as he watched the desperately pleading man he'd dumped into the harbor like so much garbage drown, but off the clock of the Party's killings he's a two-bit wolf who can't leave his assistant in charge of the concession without the ostentatious toughness of "Keep your mitts out of that till or I'll stomp them." Nan attracts his attention by elegantly drilling four targets like she's got murder on her mind, then lets him take her out to his regular nightspot on Pacific Street and clock her as a prospective client, spinning an ingenuously hard-luck story of a no-good husband who just happens to have a lot of insurance; although she compliments his dancing and drinks deliberately from his glass, she doesn't vamp him so much as she lets his own conceit lead him on until she just needs to challenge him, "Show me your clippings," for him to spill his guts about her brother's murder. For once in its thud of propaganda, the picture feels like noir. Nan's horrified by Bailey, but she has to maintain her front of professional interest with a frisson of sexual intrigue, the surest hook for a hood so convinced he's God's gift to women that he's putting the moves on a would-be widow like he's never seen the end of Double Indemnity (1944). He's a dangerous creep, not just a drunken one, sociopathically snickering as he reveals the details of his hit-and-run specialty without a sign of awareness that they might not be so smart to share; he could turn nasty if he suspects her imposture, but then again he could turn nasty if he takes her bait. He's still chortling, "No evidence—no nothing—accident!" as Nan absorbs the horror of what she's just heard, her face hardening with the knowledge or her next move, and the scene is immediately short-circuited by the arrival of another Communist to enlighten Bailey and imperil Nan and nothing ever comes of her excursion into the demimonde rouge except for some nice location shooting. No wonder audiences were disappointed by the billing of I Married a Communist if these five twisty minutes were as much subjectivity as "I" got. It's cute that Talman was cast off-kilter right out of the gate, but I'd have let Day pursue him a lot farther if I wanted their scenes to salvage the pic.

While it seems not to be true that the script of I Married a Communist was employed by Hughes as a kind of litmus test for Communist sympathies among RKO personnel, the film's self-inflicted production hell did take it a year to land a director in the person of Robert Stevenson; the screenplay likewise went through generations of divers hands before winding up with the combined credits of Charles Grayson, Robert Hardy Andrews, George W. George, and George F. Slavin and the cast announcements were a revolving door. The dark lantern photography of Nicholas Musuraca makes the whole affair look far better than it has any right to, although the production design by Albert D'Agostino is not immune to such anvillicious infelicities as captioning an argument about Communist influence on the waterfront with the shadow of a cargo hook with some freight hanging off it in exactly the silhouette of a hammer and sickle. The ending makes dynamically rat-run use of the empty, occluded spaces of the warehouse, but the apportionment of the body count by the final credits leaves The Woman on Pier 13 the most literally better-dead-than-Red film I have ever seen. It's impressive in its foot-shooting way. It stumps so relentlessly against Communism that it neglects to establish what it's crusading for. It wants to be The Manchurian Candidate (1962), but the best it can manage is Reefer Madness (1936). You don't have to take my word for it; it's on the Internet Archive in a sketchy transfer, but it's a sketchy movie. Fortunately, TCM's Summer Under the Stars has some immediately upcoming Robert Ryan with which to recover and I can find plenty of film noir that isn't burdened with lines like "One Party member should be able to indoctrinate one thousand non-Party members, unquote." This ashcan brought to you by my neat backers at Patreon.

March 2024

S M T W T F S
      1 2
34 5 67 8 9
1011 12 131415 16
17 18 19 2021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2024-03-25 16:52
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios