sovay: (Sydney Carton)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2017-12-13 11:15 pm
Entry tags:

I'm shining like a new dime

If you are making the sweet astringent Scoville-heavy barbecue sauce that has come to be known in your household as "helljam," and if you have no cider vinegar but only white vinegar because you keep meaning to use it to clean your kettle, but you also have in the refrigerator a small bottle of tamarind pulp that was never used for its intended recipe either, you may discover that tamarind pulp adds such an excellent dimension to barbecue sauce that you plan to incorporate it from now on, even when you have the full amount of ketchup required.

In other news, tonight we broiled steak tips with helljam and cheese grits on the side and I have tabled my plan to make rice pudding for dessert, because I might explode.

Regarding my cautious optimism of earlier today, [personal profile] spatch just told me that Patreon is reaching out to patrons who canceled in the last few days. "Creators should not be penalized for our bad call. Your connection means everything to us, and we're working to restore what we damaged." It's good business, of course, but I hope there's heart in it, too. It is certainly more than I expected and I am glad to see it.
starlady: Raven on a MacBook (Default)

[personal profile] starlady 2017-12-14 07:01 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad that Patreon has reversed this particular decision, but I worry that the reversal may create a false sense of security in the community. They're still VC-funded, which means they're still under pressure to find a Pivot™ to make their VC backers lots of cash.
justice_turtle: image of fountain pen with calligraphy text that says "writing" (writing pen)

[personal profile] justice_turtle 2017-12-14 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Patreon is reaching out to patrons who canceled in the last few days

Okay, that makes me cautiously impressed. It is, as you say, good business, but it also... *fumbles for words*... Like, I would have expected them to leave it at the apology letter to creators, which was the necessary minimum of PR patching. Reaching out to the patrons who canceled, many of whom (it’s my impression) were $1 patrons, reads to me almost like a willingness to apologize to people they hurt, as opposed to only people whose outrage was especially hurting them. I don’t know, am I making any sense? I’d have expected them to leave the job of retrieving low-level patrons to the creators, if they really cared as little about $1 patronage as their initial actions (and that epically tone-deaf “life-changing threshold” memo) suggested. I feel like they’re eating more crow than I would expect a corporation to be willing to do, and I’m hopeful that that’s a good sign.

Like, I still have them filed under a Do Not Trust tab in my brain, i.e. I’ll be looking into other options down the line and keeping a sharp eye out for any new fuckery, but they’re not under the We Hates It Precious tab. You know?
drwex: (Default)

[personal profile] drwex 2017-12-15 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, the link Patreon provided to let me try and re-establish my cancelled pledges did not work.
drwex: (Default)

[personal profile] drwex 2017-12-16 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
No response as yet
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2018-02-13 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
HOW DID I MISS THE HELLJAM RECIPE
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2018-02-13 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
OH FUCK YES