sovay: (Default)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2006-03-08 09:31 pm

First you pound the fish flat with a mallet

Is it a bad sign if my first reaction to the discovery of a new crustacean is "Aww . . ."* and my second is "I wonder if it's edible?"

*So fuzzily Lovecraftian! Also, the fact that there's a Polynesian goddess of crustaceans simply rocks.

[identity profile] kraada.livejournal.com 2006-03-10 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
I imagine they're the sort of comestible one eats en masse.

Well, yes, I was imagining a tribble as something like a puff pastry in terms of capacity to fill you up. I mean, clearly most of its body is used to hold eggs which are about to be laid. So at best it will have the nutritional value of a coconut filled with escargot-of-tribble, at worst the nutritional value of a marshmellow.

All I can imagine if they are marshmellow-like is a Klingon eating game: How many tribbles can you fit into your mouth at one time? The record is somewhere around 6 or 7, if you consider how many the Klingon actually put in his mouth. Though if you count post-reproduction, there were probably 13 or 14 in there. But it's somewhat hard to tell, as by the time of judging the entire building was full of tribbles and had to be nuked from orbit . . .

locusts are parve

Wikipedia doesn't explicitly say, but I think so. At least, I'm sure I've eaten chocolate covered grasshoppers with a hescher on them. What I'm not sure is whether it was milk chocolate or not. But it may well have been. (For reference purposes: they're crunchy.)

[identity profile] signy1.livejournal.com 2006-03-11 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
Gerrold originally put something into the script about how tribbles could be bred for meat and fur-- Roddenberry nixed it because in his future wearing fur was barbaric, and I suppose eating the cute widdle fluffy things would be even more so.

(Yes. I am a big geek. Your point?)