![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
A bird's head, formed from a streaming mosaic of scales
Everybody remembers Tanith Lee's The Book of the Beast (1988)? The second of the Secret Books of Paradys, with the rapacious scaled bird-headed demon carried from the Near East to the fort of Par Dis in Roman days? It possessed a centurion, then his son, devouring him into its deadly avatar; then their line was extinguished, except it wasn't? Out of Assyria, an utuk, having as its own form the body of a man, the head of a bird, but a bird of the beginnings, scaled not feathered, from the fifth day of the earth . . .
Okay, technically that is a Romanized image of Horus from the first or second century CE, currently on display at the British Museum as part of a really interesting-sounding exhibit. In keeping with the traditions of Roman portraiture, it's an impressively realistic attempt to represent a man with a falcon's head, with partial results of modern-day nightmare fuel; the inclusion of human hair and ears is striking, as is the way the feathers of the throat transition into the scale-mail of the imperial lorica plumata. The head looks flattened because it is missing the crown it should have supported. It was acquired by the museum in 1912 and I would love to know if Lee ever saw it. The answer may well be nope. Writers have imaginations, after all. But I know what it looked like accidental fan art for when I saw it.
(Given the Assyrian origins, I always figured Lee's utuk looked like a bird-headed apkallu, which if so is unfair to some benevolent guardian spirits. The combination of feathers, scales, and bird-headed human figure just really got my attention here. I am now trying to avoid spinning off into actual fan art, because the last time it took forever.)
Okay, technically that is a Romanized image of Horus from the first or second century CE, currently on display at the British Museum as part of a really interesting-sounding exhibit. In keeping with the traditions of Roman portraiture, it's an impressively realistic attempt to represent a man with a falcon's head, with partial results of modern-day nightmare fuel; the inclusion of human hair and ears is striking, as is the way the feathers of the throat transition into the scale-mail of the imperial lorica plumata. The head looks flattened because it is missing the crown it should have supported. It was acquired by the museum in 1912 and I would love to know if Lee ever saw it. The answer may well be nope. Writers have imaginations, after all. But I know what it looked like accidental fan art for when I saw it.
(Given the Assyrian origins, I always figured Lee's utuk looked like a bird-headed apkallu, which if so is unfair to some benevolent guardian spirits. The combination of feathers, scales, and bird-headed human figure just really got my attention here. I am now trying to avoid spinning off into actual fan art, because the last time it took forever.)
no subject
Yup.
(I think it's, in large part at least, that the Romans here were perversely WORSE at making the head look like it actually belonged to a hawk, as opposed to some sort of freaky nightmare beast: something like this actually looks like a raptor.)
no subject
For starters, it doesn't have ears!
(Speaking honestly, I think this statue is wonderful: I've never seen anything like it and I'd love to know if there are more. That said, there really is a reason it reminds me of a demon from Tanith Lee. It hits the sweet spot between zoomorphism and WHAT THE HELL ASS BALLS.)
no subject
I note that people with "hawk-like faces" do not, in fact, look very much at all like hawks, at least not in their actual lineaments. It is much more of a metaphorical likeness.