2018-09-17

sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
I am having an idiosyncratic reaction to Fritz Lang's The Big Heat (1953). I don't think I liked it very much. I had expected to—I started my acquaintance of Fritz Lang with Metropolis (1927) and he has rarely let me down since. I make an exception for Western Union (1941), but that film is such a mess on all levels aside from Randolph Scott that I don't feel much about it except slightly like taking a shower. I didn't want steam-cleaning after The Big Heat. It's not incoherent or unintelligent. It does everything it means to and it does it well, in swift, lean, hardboiled style that I suspect of setting a trend for generations. I just don't like the trend all that much, either.

In brief, The Big Heat is a brilliantly executed example of the genus Women in refrigerators, species honest cop's wife is murdered because crooks run his city and the law has its hands tied when it's not on the take, so he turns in his badge, does not turn in his gun, and goes on an extrajudicial revenge spree. Previously a straight-arrow family man possessed of such squeaky-clean morality it could give a boy scout toothache, Glenn Ford's Dave Bannion turns himself into a monster to fight monsters and leaves an unsurprising trail of bodies in his wake; it got my attention, though, that most of the bodies are women's. There are four female characters with significant screen time in this movie and they all end up dead. It is true that they are not merely props; whether information or bullets, all have something to contribute to the course of the plot. Their bodies are still the script's yardstick of violence—it measures the nastiness of its men in the damage they inflict on women. From cigarette burns to car bombs, that's how we know the villains are villains, deserving of whatever judgment our hero and the last embers of the law can drag them down to. In this sense the film is much less subversive than most of the noir I'm used to seeing, which trusts an audience to know a triggerman for a no-goodnik even when he doesn't grind out his stogie on a date's hand; it is probably excessive of me to hold it responsible for Frank Miller, but I did expect weirder from Mr. Blue Gardenia. I knew the film's reputation as a famously brutal, iconic noir. I just thought the brutality would be more on the emotional-ethical order, like Jules Dassin's Night and the City (1950) with its bottom-feeding cast of spivs and touts and suckers, all equal-opportunity screwed; that's a movie that can make you feel gut-punched with nothing more than a few fast words. Women always getting the worst of it doesn't shock me with the cruelty of the world. It just makes a movie kind of tiring to watch.

I understand its reputation otherwise. Sydney Boehm worked as a reporter before turning to screenwriting and he has a gift for the mechanisms of crime in cities, the grounding mundanity of bribes and cover-ups and botched contracts; if The Big Heat's fictional, studio-built Kenport never achieves the location-shot liftoff of Side Street (1949)'s New York City or Mystery Street (1950)'s Boston, it still feels real enough to support late-night fry-ups in middle-class kitchens as well as cheap hotels and expensive clubs and mansions upholstered with Prohibition money so successfully insulated from its lawless origins that it has become, like the steel and rail and oil money of the robber barons, too rich not to be respectable. The runtime is ninety minutes and hasn't got a second of fat on it, not even in the cinematography by Charles Lang which without anything as dramatic as an expressionist bloom makes its world look precision-grained with tension, all rooms too small except when they're too empty, everyone's faces crisp enough to draw blood. The cast may be archetypes of vigilante fantasy, but they're more than just cardboard targets; they have textures. Even the essential noir element is present, not so much in the violence of the plot or the corruption of the setting, but the vengeful question of the abyss that looks back. I just can't stop thinking of this movie as the taproot text for entire genres I don't watch. It feels closer to the popular reception of noir than most of the noirs I've seen. How did it and its women become such a dominant strain—dead good wives or living bad widows, gruesomely murdered B-girls, grotesquely scarred molls?

This last is the one part of The Big Heat that grips and unnerves and electrifies me and it is all to the credit of Gloria Grahame. Say, I like this—Early Nothing. ) Glenn Ford isn't doing a bad job as Bannion, but he rather pales in comparison.

It is possible that Lang and Boehm themselves had their doubts. So many women bite the dust in our hero's wake (the survivors: one pre-kindergarten daughter, one walk-on sister-in-law, and one spinster secretary), it would not be a stretch to read the film as an indictment of the kind of white-knighting Bannion thinks he's practicing, where his heroic sallies always have collateral damage, which in turn fuels the righteousness of his anger. He's called on it by a character who should know, but can't make it up to her before her death scene. His brisk, parting line in the picture—"Keep the coffee hot, Hugo!"—is so superbly tactless that it must be meaningful. Even so, even if he is being judged by his creators and found as wanting in his failures of forethought and compassion as the men who order the murders of women or carry them out, it's still by those weights and measures I mentioned earlier: still a lot of collateral dead women to sit through. I had thought for some reason that was a problem I was immune to. Maybe it exists in proportion to my disappointment with the material. Lang's earlier noir Western Rancho Notorious (1952) opened with a rape-murder and vengeance on its mind, but then it burrowed into its chosen mythos and ate its heart out. There's nothing so stealthy or cruel in The Big Heat except Grahame. For every beat of merely observed reality, like the most endearing traits of Bannion's wife (Jocelyn Brando, who does deserve the name-check) being her most imperfect ones, there's another pointing forward to the conservative vigilante thrillers of which this year's remake of Death Wish (2018) and its female counterpart Peppermint (2018) are just the latest examples. It's asking all the right questions to destabilize its world, which is the work of every good noir—but the answers it's supplying just build the familiar rules back up again.

I am not saying Fritz Lang is canceled. I suspect the motivational dead wife was not such a well-polished TV trope when he got hold of it and in any case you pry Frau im Mond (1929), You and Me (1938), or, yes, M (1931) from my fingers at your own risk. But [personal profile] spatch said consolingly afterward, "I'm sorry you got bobcat in your noir!" and that about sums it up. If you consider its plot one of the Aristotelian evergreens, you will have a fine time with this movie. Otherwise you may find yourself at the credits with your face scratched up. This expensive fun brought to you by my lucky backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Otachi: Pacific Rim)
This is to request that if you have read and enjoyed Forget the Sleepless Shores, please consider saying as much on Amazon or Goodreads or both.

If you have already done so, thank you! Apparently quantity as well as quality of reviews has a significant effect on Amazon's willingness to promote a book and that affects sales figures and all is algorithms if not vanity, but I would like to see this book read and appreciated by people I do not know personally and in our present state of techno-dystopia, Amazon reviews are one of the mechanisms by which that is achieved.

In short, I really hate self-promotion. Please tell other people to buy my book so that I don't have to do it?
Page generated 2025-05-25 20:32
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios