![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
I'm the guy you buy
I met my father this afternoon for a matinée of Tony Gilroy's Michael Clayton (2007) at the Brattle Theatre. I had not seen the film since it was released and it really holds up. It's a character study interlocked into a tight ensemble drama; it has classic bones and no guarantees. I can't say it's the best acting George Clooney has ever done only because I love so much his perfect '30's leading-man turn in O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000), but he's human-sized here, bruised and ambiguous, a man whose finesse with dirty deals and laundry has never made him more than a "janitor" to the swanky law firm that declines to offer his blue collar a partnership, no matter how sharp his suits or sealed his lips. Tilda Swinton almost certainly deserved her Oscar just for ruthlessly suppressing her natural air of the numinous, substituting flop sweat and a queasy determination that would be admirable if it weren't in service of corporate exploitation that can't even be written off as cartoonish, it's so routine and successful. I first noticed Tom Wilkinson in this movie, having a spectacular version of Clooney's own moral jolt: a glittering manic break in the middle of a tricky class-action suit, precipitated by an inconvenient access of conscience, also going off his meds. Other character actors have made themselves visible in the decade since, each sketching in some angle of the title character's world and the aggression, anxiety, weariness, and anger that principally define it (hello, Denis O'Hare, Sean Cullen, Sydney Pollack, Bill Raymond, oh, good God, Ken Howard, that was you). Other ways of living swing elliptically through the story. Good luck getting hold of one of them.
Looking at the film now, I am not surprised that I fell in love with it ten years ago, because it is, in addition to a kind of chamber corporate thriller, an essentially noir narrative. Its chief concerns are people's prices and limits, how far they'll go and for whose sake, whether there is such a thing as redemption or whether some stains go too deep or whether it even matters so long as just here, just now, just a little, the damage stops. It assumes institutional corruption and personal complicity without making them anyone's excuse. It asks real ethical questions and proffers no pat answers. I've never seen it counted among modern neo-noir and I'm wondering if people miss it because it eschews the style: there are no cigarette contrails or Venetian blinds, but all the philosophy is there, the starkness with which the void can suddenly open beneath you. It's never didactic; it would be dead in the water if it preached. The longest speeches belong to Wilkinson and as his character says shruggingly, "I'm crazy, right?" But it makes its audience notice the inequalities, how being useful is not the same as belonging, how suffering in aggregate can be business as usual until a face turns it into personal crisis, how the woman in the boardroom is the one out on the branch that can be sawn off at need (which does not absolve her of the actions she takes to cling there), and without playing games with audience satisfaction it ends with a move into the appropriate total unknown. It's not grimdark, because good noir isn't. It just doesn't promise anyone they'll make it out—even metaphorically—alive.
I am being evasive about the plot because it's good: it knows that a car bomb and a photocopy can be equally explosive, but the renunciation of empathy is more killing than any chemical. I didn't realize the writer-director had also written four of the Bourne movies, although I feel I should have been able to guess from the scene with Clive Owen in The Bourne Identity (2002), or that he co-wrote the script for Rogue One (2016), which is less immediately obvious to me. I can't remember if I knew that cinematographer Robert Elswit had previously worked with Clooney on Good Night and Good Luck (2005), where I discovered David Strathairn, Frank Langella, Ray Wise, and Dianne Reeves, started to notice Robert Downey, Jr., and finally differentiated Jeff Daniels from Jeff Bridges; he gets some beautiful shots out of ordinary things and some horrifying ones out of the same, like a glossily deserted, fluorescent-lit office building late at night that seems to be waiting for J.G. Ballard. I wish Clooney had won the Best Actor he was nominated for; I don't still randomly think about Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood a decade later. I think the best compliment I can pay this movie is that even if I think of it as noir, I don't think it would have been better filmed in 1949 with John Garfield or Dan Duryea. This memo brought to you by my valuable backers at Patreon.
Looking at the film now, I am not surprised that I fell in love with it ten years ago, because it is, in addition to a kind of chamber corporate thriller, an essentially noir narrative. Its chief concerns are people's prices and limits, how far they'll go and for whose sake, whether there is such a thing as redemption or whether some stains go too deep or whether it even matters so long as just here, just now, just a little, the damage stops. It assumes institutional corruption and personal complicity without making them anyone's excuse. It asks real ethical questions and proffers no pat answers. I've never seen it counted among modern neo-noir and I'm wondering if people miss it because it eschews the style: there are no cigarette contrails or Venetian blinds, but all the philosophy is there, the starkness with which the void can suddenly open beneath you. It's never didactic; it would be dead in the water if it preached. The longest speeches belong to Wilkinson and as his character says shruggingly, "I'm crazy, right?" But it makes its audience notice the inequalities, how being useful is not the same as belonging, how suffering in aggregate can be business as usual until a face turns it into personal crisis, how the woman in the boardroom is the one out on the branch that can be sawn off at need (which does not absolve her of the actions she takes to cling there), and without playing games with audience satisfaction it ends with a move into the appropriate total unknown. It's not grimdark, because good noir isn't. It just doesn't promise anyone they'll make it out—even metaphorically—alive.
I am being evasive about the plot because it's good: it knows that a car bomb and a photocopy can be equally explosive, but the renunciation of empathy is more killing than any chemical. I didn't realize the writer-director had also written four of the Bourne movies, although I feel I should have been able to guess from the scene with Clive Owen in The Bourne Identity (2002), or that he co-wrote the script for Rogue One (2016), which is less immediately obvious to me. I can't remember if I knew that cinematographer Robert Elswit had previously worked with Clooney on Good Night and Good Luck (2005), where I discovered David Strathairn, Frank Langella, Ray Wise, and Dianne Reeves, started to notice Robert Downey, Jr., and finally differentiated Jeff Daniels from Jeff Bridges; he gets some beautiful shots out of ordinary things and some horrifying ones out of the same, like a glossily deserted, fluorescent-lit office building late at night that seems to be waiting for J.G. Ballard. I wish Clooney had won the Best Actor he was nominated for; I don't still randomly think about Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood a decade later. I think the best compliment I can pay this movie is that even if I think of it as noir, I don't think it would have been better filmed in 1949 with John Garfield or Dan Duryea. This memo brought to you by my valuable backers at Patreon.
David Strathairn
Re: David Strathairn
It's related to my not seeing all that many movies growing up and to the nature of character actors. I almost certainly saw Strathairn for the first time in The Brother from Another Planet (1984) when I was quite small, but I didn't pay attention to the actors playing the Men in Black: my takeaway from that film was Joe Morton. I remember when A League of Their Own (1992) came out and kids around me were talking about it, but I was introduced to it by a friend in grad school, quite possibly after we saw Good Night, and Good Luck. I saw Eight Men Out (1988) with my mother in 2010. I saw The Secret of Roan Inish (1994) in theaters—and I got John Lynch out of it—but it doesn't have David Strathairn. Once I noticed him, of course, like any good character actor he was everywhere: The Notorious Bettie Page (2005) in theaters, The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer on TV (2009), a bunch of films including the abovementioned in hindsight. But first I had to see him in a role where he stood out for me, and the rare lead of Good Night, and Good Luck was it. It was the same with Denholm Elliott in Patrick Garland's A Doll's House (1973) in 2008 and Ralph Richardson in The Fallen Idol (1948) in 2012. It is a little difficult for me when you frequently attribute so much of my history with movies to age, because I am an outlier in my age group. Any apparent expertise I have with film formed in the last ten to eleven years, fourteen to fifteen at maximum. I missed most of the pop culture of my childhood at the time.
One of the prompts was to ask the women to pick a sexy actor, and after some discussion, they came up with DS. And then were ashamed of themselves for objectifying people, and changed the subject.
He has got a great face.
Re: David Strathairn
as well it should be.
I think "Eight Men Out" should be a required prequel to "Field of Dreams," but it presumably was a coincidence that they came out a year apart.
>>Once I noticed him, of course, like any good character actor he was everywhere<<
yes.
no subject
Ardor and AshesZeal and Ardor is. (Ardor and Ashes would also be a cool name, but the actual name is pretty great too. Is it a duo?)ETA: Nevermind! I see you have a whole entry about the band, further back.
no subject
It's cool!
I would definitely try out a band called Ardor and Ashes.
no subject
no subject
Thank you.
Plopped this right on my to-watch, thank you.
Re: Plopped this right on my to-watch, thank you.
The Reckless Moment is one of my favorite films noirs (it even produced a poem), so I have heard of The Deep End but not seen it. It's actually coming up tomorrow at the Brattle. Hm. Thank you for the recommendation!
Re: Plopped this right on my to-watch, thank you.
Thanks for the links.
Re: Plopped this right on my to-watch, thank you.
I did not make it to the theater this evening due to being completely wiped out, but at such time as I get hold of the movie on DVD and give it a try, I will let you know what I think.
Re: Plopped this right on my to-watch, thank you.
no subject
no subject
I can see that. I noticed Tom Wilkinson in this movie for a reason.
I should rewatch, but I'm not sure I can stand to right now.
I loved seeing it again, but I acknowledge that I have been comfort-watching noir for about two years now.
no subject
And now I'm wondering where the phrase "dead in the water" originated.
no subject
It leapt out at me in the film this time around, though I know it must have been there ten years ago. I suspect I am more attuned to it now.
And now I'm wondering where the phrase "dead in the water" originated.
I have always associated it with becalmed ships.
becalmed ships