So earlier tonight I went to my fifth Burns Supper with the Serious Burns Unit and my fourth with
derspatchel. There was whisky and singing and haggis. It was a nice way to spend an evening. Afterward I visited my cats, whom I miss constantly; then I came home and found my contributor's copy of Go Now, the latest annual not-Not One of Us publication, containing my poem "Anybody That Looked Like That." This is the poem inspired by Stranger on the Third Floor (1940) and some of the ways that film looks at outsiderness. The table of contents includes work by Patricia Russo, Mat Joiner, Erik Amundsen, Russell Hemmell, and Alexandra Seidel, among others. The cover art is fantastic. The epigraph is from the Moody Blues.
nineweaving gave me a cup in a style I am calling Kaiju Delft—blue and white pottery with the usual assortment of bridges, pavilions, and gracefully trailing willows, plus atomic robots, pterodactyls, sea monsters, flying saucers, mysterious tentacles, a gigantic toad . . . It makes me very happy.
I feel very much as though the week since Arisia went by in a single sleepless slur. On Thursday I took Rob to Loyal Nine for his birthday, where we enjoyed sea urchin with bone marrow crostini and blowtorched scallop with fennel and pulled pork shoulder with handmade triticale macaroni and I was reminded that I can never take triticale quite seriously as a real grain instead of a science fiction MacGuffin. Adding mezcal to a Corpse Reviver #2 produces a cocktail I would drink on a regular basis if I could afford it. The sourdough chocolate brewis was so decadent we could not actually finish it, although to be fair that was also because it is huge. I made a much plainer cake for Rob on Saturday, when the rest of my family was available to celebrate his birthday observed: it was a waffle cake, because it turns out that you can stack four freshly made waffles with strawberry purée and whipped cream in between each layer and frost the whole thing with more whipped cream and stick some candles on top and it will hold together just long enough to make an attractive cross-section when sliced, after which everyone is on their own. My niece left most of hers on the scenery, but this is the same kid who celebrated her first birthday by headbutting the first slice of cake with which she was ever presented. Rob and I watched Playhouse 90's The Comedian (1957), a devastating triple threat of a live television drama directed by John Frankenheimer from a script by Rod Serling and Ernest Lehman with Mickey Rooney in the title role. A barrel of laughs, it is not, but it's riveting. I have to take Mel Tormé seriously as an actor now. Sunday was shoveling and I've already mentioned how that turned out.
I can't believe I have already read Herman Wouk's The Winds of War (1971) and the majority of War and Remembrance (1978) when I care about exactly one plot thread in the entire impressively researched, two-thousand-page megillah. It's an ambitious experiment, to write a family novel that tries to have an angle on every facet of the mainstream American experience of World War II, but I keep looking at individual episodes and thinking that they would have made perfectly fine novels on their own if the author could have been persuaded to extricate them from the surrounding matrix of historical significance. I've had exactly the same reaction to the miniseries, too, which at least confirms that I am consistent in my interests.1 The acting helps with the prose, but nothing helps with the amount of narrative convenience required to get the various characters into the different theaters of war in order to provide the necessary first-hand views on historic events. I think it was the point where a central character was sent to Moscow just to get Stalin into the narrative that I stopped being able to take it seriously. I mean, I don't need a member of the Henry family to talk to Stalin in order to believe he exists! He left a considerable historical footprint! (Like this joke.) He can make decisions offscreen and they can affect the war in Europe and I'll take the author's word for it! But, no. We go to Moscow and there's face time with Stalin and at least I got some scenes with the character I cared about. I am finding this whole experience fascinating, but I'm not sure I can recommend it to anyone who isn't making a survey of historical novels about World War II.2 It's a Holocaust novel, too, of course. It is very strange for me to read a Jewish author writing about Jewish characters as if from the outside, for the presumed identification of non-Jewish readers. I'm fairly certain that's the reason I don't care as much as I should about the primary female protagonist. Maybe Wouk's just not great with women.
I need to review some movies.
1. For those who keep track of such things: the thread I care about centers on the diplomat Leslie Slote, played in both series by David Dukes. His character arc went sadly where I had been half afraid it would, but I really enjoyed him until then. I don't know why I'm talking vaguely about a pair of forty-year-old novels and thirty-year-old miniseries, Wikipedia and TV Tropes will tell you what happened to everyone if you care, but I find it interesting to watch people who are wrong about the sort of people they believe they are.
2. Not, I suspect, in the way its author intended, it has been reminding me of my sole experience of War and Peace (1869), which occurred when I was in seventh grade and had just burned through the last of Mikhail Sholokhov's Don books and for some reason looked at the Russian literature on my mother's shelves and decided the obvious next step was Tolstoy. I don't know which translation it was. I don't think it mattered. I can't remember a thing about the novel itself; my total memory of the book is a seemingly endless alternation between battle scenes where I understood none of the tactics and ballroom scenes where I understood none of the etiquette and every now and then someone would say something that made sense to me and I could go, "Yes, I don't want to get shot in a cavalry charge, either!" Fortunately I got to college and discovered Gogol, Bulgakov, and Akhmatova and was not scared off Russian literature for life, but man, don't read War and Peace when you're twelve.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I feel very much as though the week since Arisia went by in a single sleepless slur. On Thursday I took Rob to Loyal Nine for his birthday, where we enjoyed sea urchin with bone marrow crostini and blowtorched scallop with fennel and pulled pork shoulder with handmade triticale macaroni and I was reminded that I can never take triticale quite seriously as a real grain instead of a science fiction MacGuffin. Adding mezcal to a Corpse Reviver #2 produces a cocktail I would drink on a regular basis if I could afford it. The sourdough chocolate brewis was so decadent we could not actually finish it, although to be fair that was also because it is huge. I made a much plainer cake for Rob on Saturday, when the rest of my family was available to celebrate his birthday observed: it was a waffle cake, because it turns out that you can stack four freshly made waffles with strawberry purée and whipped cream in between each layer and frost the whole thing with more whipped cream and stick some candles on top and it will hold together just long enough to make an attractive cross-section when sliced, after which everyone is on their own. My niece left most of hers on the scenery, but this is the same kid who celebrated her first birthday by headbutting the first slice of cake with which she was ever presented. Rob and I watched Playhouse 90's The Comedian (1957), a devastating triple threat of a live television drama directed by John Frankenheimer from a script by Rod Serling and Ernest Lehman with Mickey Rooney in the title role. A barrel of laughs, it is not, but it's riveting. I have to take Mel Tormé seriously as an actor now. Sunday was shoveling and I've already mentioned how that turned out.
I can't believe I have already read Herman Wouk's The Winds of War (1971) and the majority of War and Remembrance (1978) when I care about exactly one plot thread in the entire impressively researched, two-thousand-page megillah. It's an ambitious experiment, to write a family novel that tries to have an angle on every facet of the mainstream American experience of World War II, but I keep looking at individual episodes and thinking that they would have made perfectly fine novels on their own if the author could have been persuaded to extricate them from the surrounding matrix of historical significance. I've had exactly the same reaction to the miniseries, too, which at least confirms that I am consistent in my interests.1 The acting helps with the prose, but nothing helps with the amount of narrative convenience required to get the various characters into the different theaters of war in order to provide the necessary first-hand views on historic events. I think it was the point where a central character was sent to Moscow just to get Stalin into the narrative that I stopped being able to take it seriously. I mean, I don't need a member of the Henry family to talk to Stalin in order to believe he exists! He left a considerable historical footprint! (Like this joke.) He can make decisions offscreen and they can affect the war in Europe and I'll take the author's word for it! But, no. We go to Moscow and there's face time with Stalin and at least I got some scenes with the character I cared about. I am finding this whole experience fascinating, but I'm not sure I can recommend it to anyone who isn't making a survey of historical novels about World War II.2 It's a Holocaust novel, too, of course. It is very strange for me to read a Jewish author writing about Jewish characters as if from the outside, for the presumed identification of non-Jewish readers. I'm fairly certain that's the reason I don't care as much as I should about the primary female protagonist. Maybe Wouk's just not great with women.
I need to review some movies.
1. For those who keep track of such things: the thread I care about centers on the diplomat Leslie Slote, played in both series by David Dukes. His character arc went sadly where I had been half afraid it would, but I really enjoyed him until then. I don't know why I'm talking vaguely about a pair of forty-year-old novels and thirty-year-old miniseries, Wikipedia and TV Tropes will tell you what happened to everyone if you care, but I find it interesting to watch people who are wrong about the sort of people they believe they are.
2. Not, I suspect, in the way its author intended, it has been reminding me of my sole experience of War and Peace (1869), which occurred when I was in seventh grade and had just burned through the last of Mikhail Sholokhov's Don books and for some reason looked at the Russian literature on my mother's shelves and decided the obvious next step was Tolstoy. I don't know which translation it was. I don't think it mattered. I can't remember a thing about the novel itself; my total memory of the book is a seemingly endless alternation between battle scenes where I understood none of the tactics and ballroom scenes where I understood none of the etiquette and every now and then someone would say something that made sense to me and I could go, "Yes, I don't want to get shot in a cavalry charge, either!" Fortunately I got to college and discovered Gogol, Bulgakov, and Akhmatova and was not scared off Russian literature for life, but man, don't read War and Peace when you're twelve.