sovay: (Claude Rains)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2018-02-11 11:51 pm

Keats and Yeats are on your side, but you lose

I wish to register a complaint with the universe that I had no idea that Eddie Shields—the beautiful Gaveston of the ASP's Edward II—was playing Christopher Marlowe in a local stage adaptation of Shakespeare in Love until tonight, otherwise known as too late. I know it's my own fault for not reading the arts section and I appreciate that other Boston-area directors have recognized his obvious affinity for Marlowe; it bodes well for his appearances in future. But I would have liked to be able to take advantage of this one!

I spent the afternoon with my cousins and Fox for the first time since before Arisia. It was good. Assorted links.

1. Dr. Kate Lister debunks the Victorian vibrator myth, with entertaining commentary and horrifying illustrations: "Once you have moved past the fact that the doctor and patient strongly resemble escapees from Area 51 . . ."

2. My brother and his family are planning to drive across Canada next summer. I have commended them to the stone dragon of Alberta.

3. This entire issue of poetry from Aotearoa/New Zealand is very good, but at the moment Kate Camp's "Gulls," Nina Powles' "Some titles for my childhood memoir," Tim Upperton's "The Truth about Palmerston North," and Gregory O'Brien and John Puhiatau Pule's "Song of the coral brain" and "Canticle of the hydrosphere" are especially sticking with me.

4. I feel that I should not discover people by their obituaries, but I think I need to hear the music of Coco Schumann.

5. I know people with this aesthetic: Ruth Maddison, "Women's dance, St Kilda Town Hall, Melbourne, 1985."
gwynnega: (Basil Rathbone)

[personal profile] gwynnega 2018-02-12 05:59 am (UTC)(link)
That Aotearoa/New Zealand poetry issue looks great. If memory serves, I visited Palmerston North one of the times I visited New Zealand in the 1980s. (Also, one of the first times I ever had my poetry published, it was in an anthology published in New Zealand!)
cyphomandra: boats in Auckland Harbour. Blue, blocky, cheerful (boats)

[personal profile] cyphomandra 2018-02-12 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
If you do make it to New Zealand, you would be very welcome to come and visit! Alas, I do not live in Palmerston North.
thisbluespirit: (james maxwell)

[personal profile] thisbluespirit 2018-02-12 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
Aw, it's annoying when you narrowly miss something good, though! Worse than missing it by miles.

4. Well, it's maybe not ideal, but better late than never!
thisbluespirit: (s&s - silver)

[personal profile] thisbluespirit 2018-02-13 08:58 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose it depends how much longer after you read the obit! (I tend to come in very late these days... I mean, my downfall with James Maxwell was the obit, definitely, and it was twenty years old.) I joke that I judge a person I like by the quality of their obituary these days, but, um, I do like some living people!!

(My and my sister once very seriously considered going to see Cymbeline at the Barbican and then didn't. I discovered in the height of my David Collings phase that it was the one with David Collings and Tom Hiddleston. So, if you find a time-travel machine or something, let me know, although actually, in that case, I've got some TV archives to raid while we're at it...)
thisbluespirit: (Default)

[personal profile] thisbluespirit 2018-02-13 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
If a time machine crosses my path, you'll hear about it.

Yesterday, indeed, I expect. ;-)
desireearmfeldt: (Default)

[personal profile] desireearmfeldt 2018-02-12 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Marlowe was rather show-stealing at the Speakeasy. :)
desireearmfeldt: (Default)

[personal profile] desireearmfeldt 2018-02-12 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
As you can perhaps infer from the photo, he was about the flamingest Marlowe imaginable. :)

As for the production, well, I have a lot of thoughts about the adaptation of the script (about which I kind of want to make a post of my own but may or may not get around to, given that I haven't done it yet). But as far as this specific production goes...hm. It was fine but not dazzling? Some miscellaneous thoughts:

I'm not sure whether or not I like the aesthetic they went for of deliberately anachronistic/mashed-up costuming -- though, as they noted in the program, it certainly is congruent with the script being deliberately mashed-up in that way.

Marlowe was quite good, Henslowe was good (and OMG, that actor has looked approximately the same age for 20 years...), Fennyman was fun. Will did a fine job but apparently didn't leave all that strong an impression on me?

Viola was somehow completely generic. Like, she did a fine job, but she was indistinguishable from any woman on TV or in the movies. I'm not sure to what extent that's partly the fault of the script, vs. the directing/acting alone.

I was not keen on the directorial choice to make Ned Allyn an over-the-top histrionic ham. It meant that in his couple of moments of seriousness -- which are extremely effective in the movie -- he wasn't able to drop down into seeming like a real human being, and so those moments lost their weight.

I was annoyed by the fact that the fight scenes -- which were really quite extended -- were choreographed with no real sense of the difference between prop weapons/characters who only knew stage combat, and real weapons/characters who actually knew how to kill people. There are at least two fights where someone with a real sword charges into a rehearsal and starts fighting actors who have to retaliate as best they can, but it all just looked the same.

asakiyume: (shaft of light)

[personal profile] asakiyume 2018-02-12 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
A tree, unshaded
takes whatever
shape the sky
chooses for it


Nice. I like those two illustrated poems. I haven't checked out the others yet.

drwex: (Default)

[personal profile] drwex 2018-02-12 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
The use of the word "buzzkill" to describe debunking a myth about vibrators has me giggling entirely too much.
moon_custafer: neon cat mask (Default)

[personal profile] moon_custafer 2018-02-12 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
“Except the table legs thing is also myth, but that’s another post for another day.”

I wish I could recall which historian I saw argue that while the Victorian age contained people who were horrified by the merest implication that women even had legs, and also people who were having kinkster orgies every night, these were only rarely the *same* people.
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-02-12 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Having gone to uni in Kit Marlowe's home town, I have more than a little liking for Kind Kit's work.
choco_frosh: (Default)

[personal profile] choco_frosh 2018-02-12 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
1. Dr. Kate Lister debunks the Victorian vibrator myth, with entertaining commentary and horrifying illustrations: "Once you have moved past the fact that the doctor and patient strongly resemble escapees from Area 51 . . ."

...I failed to notice the "horrifying illustrations" bit of this. Not so much for the truly horrifying ones as for the, uh, ones further down...
This is a bit of a problem if you're reading this at work.
Edited 2018-02-12 17:39 (UTC)
ethelmay: (Default)

[personal profile] ethelmay 2018-02-13 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
I always forget that silent films lasted into the 1930s.
coraline: (Default)

[personal profile] coraline 2018-02-13 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
i have a copy of the complete "the pearl" and yes, that was roughly my response too.

i'm sad and disappointed but also not exactly surprised about the debunking. but still sad, it was such a lovely theory (hounded to death by a horde of ugly facts).