Who I was, covered up in leaves
My mother heard on the radio this afternoon that butterfly fossils prove that the proboscis evolved a full geologic period before flowering plants did.
Me: "So what were they eating with them?"
My mother: "Aha!"
(She's suspecting carrion.)
Me: "So what were they eating with them?"
My mother: "Aha!"
(She's suspecting carrion.)

no subject
(no subject)
possibly not what you wanted to know about my reading comprehension at this hour
Re: possibly not what you wanted to know about my reading comprehension at this hour
Re: possibly not what you wanted to know about my reading comprehension at this hour
Re: possibly not what you wanted to know about my reading comprehension at this hour
no subject
Nine
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/12/the-science-facts-that-blew-our-minds-in-2017/549122/
(Actually, I'm still a bit confused because I didn't entirely understand the linked article, but I can still tell that it's pretty neat.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
Thanks for a cool link
Meanwhile, Scientific American also has people saying "maybe not" about significant ancient diversification of Lepidoptera, but it's not clear whether they mean "no, you're trying to get too much from a few fossil scales" or "yes, these three lineages go back to the end of the Triassic, but that doesn't mean there were lots of moths and butterflies flying around the early Jurassic landscape."
Thanks for the additional information!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
This guide might be "helpful", specifically number 3, the Northern Pearly-eye (and relatives). The little brown woodland butterflies of subfamily Satyrinae all share those habits. Perhaps the carnality that mythological satyrs are associated with is not quite on the mark.
(I was an entomologist in a previous life and ended up not choosing the Little Wood Satyr as my field-study species mostly because it was too cryptic and its food sources too scattered.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)