sovay: (Rotwang)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2017-12-02 07:51 pm

Es muss ein Mensch an der Maschine sein

I remembered John Crowley agreeing with H.G. Wells that the futurism of Metropolis (1927) is no such thing:

Wells notes—it's hard to miss and I thought it was the silliest thing in the movie when I first saw it—that the workers are slaves to machines, like the poor guy who actually has to manually control a clock that somehow controls the works. Did Lang not understand that the machines are designed to replace human drudgery, because machines are so much better at it? The social dislocations caused by that replacement are real, but no modern industrial society can be built on bare-faced slavery.

Leaving aside the fact that, actually, I think the U.S. is doing its best right now to disprove both Wells and Crowley and bear out Lang, I disagree completely that the image of the worker crucified on the clock is silly. Of course it's not literally how industrialization works, but as a metaphor it cuts to the bone. If anything, it's sharper in these days of the so-called gig economy. Got five minutes free? Great, that's another job you could be picking up. Already working nine to five? Relax, here's a service that never sleeps. Just chip in at your leisure, except the work won't pay so well that leisure is exactly an option. Everything that makes space in your life, makes space for more work. You're flexible and independent. You're always on the clock. Keep those hands moving. You've got the time.
muccamukk: Wanda walking away, surrounded by towering black trees, her red cloak bright. (HL: Whatever You Say)

[personal profile] muccamukk 2017-12-03 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Considering that both the British and the US had de facto slavery in 1927 via colonies and Jim Crow, that comes off as a bit rich. For that matter, what were Ford's anti-union sweatshop assembly lines? Wells wasn't paying attention the, and Crowley isn't now.
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2017-12-03 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
Had, and haven't improved much in the past 90 years.
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2017-12-03 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
It's unforgettable.
kathmandu: Close-up of pussywillow catkins. (Default)

[personal profile] kathmandu 2017-12-03 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, very chilling when you put it that way.
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-12-03 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
Did Lang not understand that the machines are designed to replace human drudgery

AAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA.

That is someone who has never done data entry on a computer from 8 to 5 with two fifteen-minute breaks and a half-hour lunch. And that is light machine/person interface.

no modern industrial society can be built on bare-faced slavery

This person also knows nothing of, say, Victorian industrial practices, pre-unionization. Also child labour in US factories decades after that.
alexxkay: (Default)

[personal profile] alexxkay 2017-12-03 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
/raises hand as one-time fellow data entry slave.
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-12-03 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I will probably have premature arthritis due to RSI caused by data entry -- I don't know if it's better or worse I came in just at the end of the age of typewriters (grew up with a Selectric II). Probably worse, because at least everyone typing on computers suddenly made the field of ergonomics a going concern, as opposed to when it was just 'secretaries' ruining their shoulders, back, elbows, wrists, fingers....
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-12-03 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
I also had a toaster! I had a manual typewriter for Christmas when I was six, so I would quit trying to use my dad's, heh. But then they splashed out later for the Selectric which was pretty expensive back then. AFAIK the huge problem with it was that there was no wrist rest -- your hands just hung down from the keys, putting pressure on the nerves/tendons. And there were "typing tables" which gave no arm support/legroom and a "typing chair" you perched on, no arm support/legroom there either. Or if you weren't lucky, a stool. Ah the bad old days. Altho back then even a job like "type up all these waiting library catalogue cards according to this template" couldn't take all day. Very different from doing data entry on a big office type computer, at least for me.

The one thing I don't miss is how I was an insomniac and my bedroom was right over a neighbours' bedroom and so my parents forbade me to type at night for years. Doesn't matter with a computer.
skygiants: shiny metal Ultraman with a Colonel Sanders beard and crown (yes minister)

[personal profile] skygiants 2017-12-03 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a reason it struck me as so apropos that the great undefeatable enemy in Friends at the Table, which I wrote about a few weeks ago, is a machine called Rigor inspired by Fordian efficiency studies.
asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (aquaman is sad)

[personal profile] asakiyume 2017-12-04 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
People are definitely crucified by work, whether it's fetching water and scrubbing clothes by hand, picking cotton, working on an assembly line--or being trapped in a call center, or, yeah, as you say: scrambling for pennies any way you can, in every single shred of time you've got. Ugh.