If I had a nickel for every cigarette your mom smoked, I'd be dead
Today has been very social, though not at all unpleasant. My brother's godparents are visiting from the Southwest, so we spent the afternoon with my family and then a sort of pre-Memorial Day dinner, which turned out surf-and-turf. There was way too much zucchini. There was not too much key lime pie. My three-year-old niece has discovered a pair of small stuffed animal rabbits which originally belonged to me and my brother—Bunnicula and Butterscotch—and is carrying them everywhere, even to dinner. She has decided that she wants a goat as a pet. (Suggestions that she ask for a pony instead were met with blank disdain.) I am no help to her parents in this argument. I think a goat in the family would be a great idea.
In the evening I met
rushthatspeaks for a sold-out showing of Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992) at the Brattle Theatre: I thought it was great. It's more overtly supernatural than the series overall—it's focused on the most overtly supernatural strand—but it's also decisively grounded by Sheryl Lee's performance, with Laura Palmer's very realistic anger, damage, and agency (it was not clear in the show that her final status was a choice rather than an inevitable consequence or a weird side effect of the manner of her death; the film offers her no good options, but she absolutely opts for the best of them, which makes it strangely difficult for me to classify the film as horror, even though content-wise I don't know what else it should be) interlocking across registers with the characters who live in the soapier layers of the plot. I was glad to see Harry Dean Stanton turn up in the supporting cast, because he feels existentially like someone who should inhabit a David Lynch universe. Now we just need to finish watching the remaining half of Season Two and figure out what to do about the third-season revival.
A later interlude of placidly watching candymaking videos by Public Displays of Confection with
spatch was interrupted by Autolycus violently throwing up all over a box of hardcover Le Guin and Tanith Lee, but fortunately the box had a lid on it, the books have been transplanted to a high shelf, and a very shaken small cat was comforted after we emergency-mopped the floor. (There was much anxious purring. We reassured him that we know he does not throw up maliciously. He never looks like he enjoys it.)
Unless it gets a National Theatre-style broadcast, I don't have a hope of seeing the Crucible's Julius Caesar on account of it being in Sheffield and me being on the other side of an ocean, but it's being done with a diverse, gender-equal cast and I wish I could see it, because Zoë Waites has a hell of a lean and hungry look:

We are talking about seeing Jacques Tati's Playtime (1967) tomorrow. I haven't seen the movie since 2010, when it was also on film at the Brattle and I loved it. I should get to bed.
In the evening I met
A later interlude of placidly watching candymaking videos by Public Displays of Confection with
Unless it gets a National Theatre-style broadcast, I don't have a hope of seeing the Crucible's Julius Caesar on account of it being in Sheffield and me being on the other side of an ocean, but it's being done with a diverse, gender-equal cast and I wish I could see it, because Zoë Waites has a hell of a lean and hungry look:

We are talking about seeing Jacques Tati's Playtime (1967) tomorrow. I haven't seen the movie since 2010, when it was also on film at the Brattle and I loved it. I should get to bed.

no subject
Yes, certainly the gulling of Malvolio hurts - horribly. Part of what I hate is that Feste cannot forgive words, but that Malvolio seems called on to forgive really malicious, damaging actions.
But then Feste is one who said that his enemies tell him the truth about himself, and it is true, as Malvolio said, that if no-one laughs at a clown, he's gagged, and truly - who's laughing at the end of the play? No-one.
no subject
That's very well observed.
I think Malvolio is the hardest part of the play to reconcile in a modern performance. The genderbending has become less theatrical and more natural; laughing at even an antagonist for being in love—for being vulnerable, for being human—has become more troubling. If he's anything other than two-dimensional, it's cruel, and if he's two-dimensional, the play is much less interesting. (I just flashed on the BBC's Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (2015): "Do not laugh at me, please. It is cruel to laugh." Eddie Marsan would make a good Malvolio.) It's almost enough to shift it from a straight comedy to a problem play. Most of the productions I've seen tend to take the gulling in two stages, which I think works: the false letter can be part of the general madcap comedy, but the madhouse is a bridge too far.