The broken oar and the gear of foreign dead men
So I feel like I owe writeups of several things, including Readercon and the movie I saw last night, but what you're getting right now is a list of different movies altogether. Over dinner tonight,
derspatchel and I were pipe-dreaming the program for a festival of maritime film. (I don't even remember. I think we were talking about John Ford.) Inevitably, it's kind of a list of our favorites. So far we agree on—
Mutiny on the Bounty (1935), dir. Frank Lloyd
Captain Blood (1935), dir. Michael Curtiz
Captains Courageous (1937), dir. Victor Fleming1
The Long Voyage Home (1940), dir. John Ford
The Cruel Sea (1953), dir. Charles Frend
The Caine Mutiny (1954), dir. Edward Dmytryk
Moby Dick (1956), dir. John Huston
The Secret of Roan Inish (1994), dir. John Sayles
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003), dir. Gore Verbinski2
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003), dir. Peter Weir
We very regretfully did not include either 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954) or Treasure Island (1950), although James Mason and Robert Newton are deservedly classic and inimitable in each.3 I am uncertain whether A Night to Remember (1958) counts as maritime film or just a disaster movie that occurs aboard a ship, albeit a wrenching and excellent example of the form. (You will notice Cameron's Titanic (1997) is not on this list.) I am also not sure I can count Splash (1984), formative sea-movie of mine though it is, and I know I can't count Pacific Rim (2013), although somehow it feels like one should. There are no documentaries; there should be some. Some more recent films couldn't hurt. And something non-American. Also it has not escaped my notice that this list of directors is kind of a dickfest and I cannot believe women never make movies about the sea. Tell me what we're missing!
1. If, as my husband stipulates, the audience remembers that the very last lines are terrible.
2. The first movie remains the best example of swashbuckling I have seen since Errol Flynn. I love so much about the second and third, but they are so wildly inconsistent I cannot in good conscience include them. Davy Jones and the Flying Dutchman and Calypso/Tia Dalma: fantastic. Elizabeth Swann coming into her piracy: could've used more, but that's why we have fanfic. The cannibal island and whatever the hell was going on with Singapore: naaarp.
3. Newton's Long John Silver is extremely imitable, but that is part of his glory.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Mutiny on the Bounty (1935), dir. Frank Lloyd
Captain Blood (1935), dir. Michael Curtiz
Captains Courageous (1937), dir. Victor Fleming1
The Long Voyage Home (1940), dir. John Ford
The Cruel Sea (1953), dir. Charles Frend
The Caine Mutiny (1954), dir. Edward Dmytryk
Moby Dick (1956), dir. John Huston
The Secret of Roan Inish (1994), dir. John Sayles
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003), dir. Gore Verbinski2
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003), dir. Peter Weir
We very regretfully did not include either 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954) or Treasure Island (1950), although James Mason and Robert Newton are deservedly classic and inimitable in each.3 I am uncertain whether A Night to Remember (1958) counts as maritime film or just a disaster movie that occurs aboard a ship, albeit a wrenching and excellent example of the form. (You will notice Cameron's Titanic (1997) is not on this list.) I am also not sure I can count Splash (1984), formative sea-movie of mine though it is, and I know I can't count Pacific Rim (2013), although somehow it feels like one should. There are no documentaries; there should be some. Some more recent films couldn't hurt. And something non-American. Also it has not escaped my notice that this list of directors is kind of a dickfest and I cannot believe women never make movies about the sea. Tell me what we're missing!
1. If, as my husband stipulates, the audience remembers that the very last lines are terrible.
2. The first movie remains the best example of swashbuckling I have seen since Errol Flynn. I love so much about the second and third, but they are so wildly inconsistent I cannot in good conscience include them. Davy Jones and the Flying Dutchman and Calypso/Tia Dalma: fantastic. Elizabeth Swann coming into her piracy: could've used more, but that's why we have fanfic. The cannibal island and whatever the hell was going on with Singapore: naaarp.
3. Newton's Long John Silver is extremely imitable, but that is part of his glory.
no subject
Okay. That is valid and useful to know!
Elizabeth Swan is not Calypso. Jack Sparrow does not become the Pirate King. Nor does he become the captain of the Flying Dutchman.
Oh, yeah. I would have been surprised and disappointed in the film had any of those been the results. (I was banking on Norrington becoming the captain of the Flying Dutchman, but once the film disposed of him, Will was the only convincing alternative—and obviously going to be good at the job.) I don't actually argue with where the story ended up; I just wanted it to flail around less getting there. My initial thoughts on At World's End are here, by the way, in case I haven't inflicted them on you before. 2007, wow.
And the film was too Tim Powers to be properly Pirates of the Caribbean, but also too Pirates to be properly Tim Powers.
Despite the presence of what looked like excellent mermaids, I avoided the fourth movie like a supernally contagious plague.
no subject
. . . dammit, why am I getting on a plane tomorrow? I want to watch all these movies! :-P
Your review of At World's End is splendid, as your reviews tend to be. I hadn't parsed all the mythical elements to quite the same extent, but yes: unlike most of what we get, it is a fantasy movie rather than merely some flavor of action or romance or whatever taking place in a fantastical world. That's surprisingly rare, and deeply satisfying to me even when we get a flawed version.
*The other is The Two Towers.
no subject
I've seen language-switching done successfully in prose; it does presume on the audience's understanding, but I think that's actually a good reason to do it.
It's a very minor note in the film, but it's one of the random little bits that sticks with me and makes me want to watch it again.
What's the corresponding moment in The Two Towers?
. . . dammit, why am I getting on a plane tomorrow? I want to watch all these movies!
I'm sorry! Bring movies to watch when you're no longer on a plane? (Where are you going?)
Your review of At World's End is splendid, as your reviews tend to be.
Thank you! Those films were a huge space in my brain and they happened at just the right time. The summers of 2006 and 2007 were full of the sea. It helped me survive them.
That's surprisingly rare, and deeply satisfying to me even when we get a flawed version.
I think it must account for some of the fandom's instant and deep and enduring love for the series. Aside from the fact that it swashbuckles gloriously, of course, and the protagonists are all interesting people, and Davy Jones' sailors were like things I had written or dreamed. And there's a Kraken.
no subject
What's the corresponding moment in The Two Towers?
The scene where they're in the armory at Helm's Deep, preparing for battle, and Legolas and Aragorn shift into and then out of Sindarin. The choice of when the shifts happen carries a lot of character nuance for me.