sovay: (Sovay: David Owen)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2014-03-18 02:18 pm

In my nature, in my blood

And this year for Saint Patrick's Day I got a booster shot, because if I can't drive out the snakes from my local area (and I like snakes, so I wouldn't do that), at least I can avoid getting mumps.

(My last MMR booster was in 1992. I had bloodwork done last week to check whether the immunities were still active. Measles, yes; mumps and rubella, no. Interestingly, the last is still considered of special concern to female-bodied people of childbearing age. Either way, I don't want any.)

It will take about two weeks for my body to build up the necessary antibodies. Remind me not to get mumps before then.

In other news of the Outer Antipodes, [livejournal.com profile] derspatchel isn't immune to mumps either. He's getting his shot this afternoon. This is possibly more ridiculous than the fact that he can wear my glasses.

really immune to rubella

[identity profile] lauradi7.livejournal.com 2014-03-18 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
When we got married in 1980, Massachusetts still required a syphilis test before granting a license, and women were additionally required to be tested for rubella, presuming, I guess that babies are a result of marriage. When I was pregnant in 1987, I was tested again. When I went back to school in 2007, I was tested again (not just for rubella, but for all the things that I had before the shots were invented). There are lots of ailments that affect a fetus when the mother has them. I have no idea why there is the fixation on rubella.

[identity profile] nineweaving.livejournal.com 2014-03-19 07:57 am (UTC)(link)
I remember a rather straight-laced acquaintance being huffy about the blood test: "Surely, they would take my word for it."

MMR is a noble thing. Sadly, anti-vaxxers are anti-persuaded by reason.

Stay well, both of you.

Nine