Are you talking about philosophy or the committee?
And courtesy of
shweta_narayan, the webcomic that ate my life yesterday: Family Man. The Enlightenment! Judaism! University politics! Theological debates! In-jokes about Ovid! In-jokes about Rousseau! Careful research of taxonomically appropriate pine trees! Our half-Jewish protagonist just tried to defend a dissertation on Spinoza at Göttingen in 1768. The werewolves at his new lectureship are the least of his problems.
In the meantime, Kate Beaton has been reviewed by The Economist.
I am not doing anything near that interesting today. I still have this book, though.
In the meantime, Kate Beaton has been reviewed by The Economist.
I am not doing anything near that interesting today. I still have this book, though.

no subject
Family Man? All that and gorgeous. I will try to set aside a day to fall into it.
Everyone: that book is fabulous.
Nine
no subject
I expect to see it on the cover of all future books of hers.
Family Man? All that and gorgeous. I will try to set aside a day to fall into it.
To be fair, it took me about an hour to read the archives, but it is still worth falling into. I am contemplating the print volume.
no subject
no subject
I believe that is generally the recommended method of reading stories.
no subject
I recall it being more crudely drawn; I tried to read it awhile back and couldn't get into it. The characters' individuation still needs some work, but the story's putting pieces in place for something big and interesting, it seems.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Must be merging multiverses.
no subject
no subject
Her hall is called sleet-damp, her plate hunger, her knife famine, her bed sickbed and her internet OMG WHERE DID MY LIFE GO WHAT DO YOU MEAN THAT WAS MY LIFE . . .
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Eeeeeeeeeeeeee.
no subject
I believe there are feeds on both DW and LJ. Once a week, not high-volume.
no subject
Thanks! I haven't even heard of it, which means very little; I read more webcomics than I think, but probably a comparably small selection. (Girl Genius, Narbonic: Director's Cut, Skin Horse, 2D Goggles, The Desert Peach, Hark! A Vagrant, xkcd and Wondermark when I remember about them, and now these two.)
no subject
Start at the beginning.
http://www.gunnerkrigg.com/archive_page.php?comicID=1
no subject
I'm reading that one in book form!
no subject
no subject
How was the screenplay?
no subject
no subject
Cool!
no subject
no subject
I like that image, but I thought it was a perfectly reasonable review.
no subject
Really I'm ignoring the wonderful thing, which is that Kate Beaton got a glowing review. More of this sort of thing!
no subject
I'm pleased with the Kate Beaton review. First The Economist, then the world.
I hope it's a pleasant day despite not being near so interesting.
I still have this book, though.
It's a good one.
*IOW, I suspect I'd like it.
no subject
Well, only if you don't want to be educated about eighteenth-century academia.
First The Economist, then the world.
I want that as a slogan.
no subject
The problem is that I also need to be educated about other things as well. Or at least to pay attention to them.
I want that as a slogan.
I doubt I'm the first to say it, but to whatever degree it is mine to give you may now consider it your very own slogan.
no subject
(Plus I have met the author -- she and my brother were friends in college -- and she's delightful. So that would be a point in its favor for me even if it weren't independently excellent.)
no subject
You should. I'd never heard of it until the day before yesterday.
(Plus I have met the author -- she and my brother were friends in college -- and she's delightful. So that would be a point in its favor for me even if it weren't independently excellent.)
That's cool!
no subject