But this was the best—except for the human element
I am skeptical of remakes. So many of them seem unnecessary at best, offensively pointless at worst. Every now and then I think of The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008) and I still don't understand.
. . . If you tell me that Peter Capaldi is going to play Professor Marcus in a stage version of The Ladykillers (1955), I want tickets.
(The rest of these are kind of stupid, but I approve of John Oliver: "You're not a man unless you own at least three monocles.")
. . . If you tell me that Peter Capaldi is going to play Professor Marcus in a stage version of The Ladykillers (1955), I want tickets.
(The rest of these are kind of stupid, but I approve of John Oliver: "You're not a man unless you own at least three monocles.")

no subject
Truly, madly, deeply.
Nine
no subject
Maybe there'll be a live broadcast . . .
no subject
Nine
no subject
no subject
I have not yet deciphered all the lyrics, but I approve so much of accurate references to Roman triumphs. Also possibly the death of Crassus, although only if Dio Cassius isn't smoking up.
It's just a matter of, it's just a matter of time . . .
no subject
Amen to that. When Hollywood had the fabulous idea of making a remake of Tarkovskij's "Solaris" I had semi-violent intestinal reactions. Getting to watch George Clooney look like a lost puppy for two hours didn't really make up for the offense.
no subject
There are very rare cases—usually cross-language—where the remake is enough of its own thing to be a worthwhile story. I think both Yojimbo (1961) and A Fistful of Dollars (1964) are worth paying attention to, for example, and while The Magnificent Seven (1960) is probably not the game-changing masterpiece of Seven Samurai (1954), there are far worse ways to waste your time with Yul Brynner, Steve McQueen, and Charles Bronson. On the other hand, I will never rewatch Christopher Nolan's Insomnia (2002) now that I own the Norwegian original—which I recommend unreservedly to anyone who hasn't seen it and even people who have—and we will not even get into the question of Let the Right One In (2008). Honestly, I don't even like Hitchcock's own remake of The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) as much as I love his 1934 original.
no subject
(My one small nit is that while the characters on the container were archaic, they weren't archaic enough for 2000BCE -- more like 200BCE I think?)
Thank you for recommending it.
---L.
no subject
I am so very glad!
but also the werid and wonderful crossover of Kalevala x Chinese mythology.
You should write it up; I'd love to read your further thoughts on this subject.
(My one small nit is that while the characters on the container were archaic, they weren't archaic enough for 2000BCE -- more like 200BCE I think?)
Yeah, fair; bird-script really isn't Bronze Age. And no one was speaking archaic enough Chinese or Finnish. But I'd take it in exchange for the other stuff, like a more intelligent than usual use of recognition-tokens.
no subject
Will write it up tonight, if I've the time.
---L.
no subject
---L.