sovay: (Lord Peter Wimsey)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2010-12-16 06:51 pm

The bulging eyes of puppets strangled by their strings

So there is a film of Angela Carter's The Magic Toyshop (1967), with screenplay by the author. It was directed by David Wheatley, starred no one I've ever heard of (the exception being its Uncle Philip, Tom Bell; Greenaway's Antonio in Prospero's Books), and judging by the number of wistful comments on IMDb, it doesn't seem to exist even on VHS unless you taped it off the television yourself in 1987. This saddens me: The Magic Toyshop wasn't the first novel I read by Carter, but it stands a good chance of still being my favorite.1 And my curiosity about its movie has been in no way diminished by the scathing contemporary review from the Washington Post I ran across last night:

In its most successful moments, the film hovers somewhere between the dank perversities of Michael Powell and those Hammer horror films in which Peter Cushing shows up as the proprietor of some haunted antique shop.

Seriously, dude: you misunderstand your comparisons. I want to see that.

1. The challenger would be Wise Children (1991), which was the first and about which [livejournal.com profile] rushthatspeaks recently discovered something neat. I am also very fond of Shadow Dance (1966), which I have under its U.S. title of Honeybuzzard with a very mod cover.

[identity profile] caprine.livejournal.com 2010-12-17 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I want to see that!

What did you think of Nights at the Circus?

[identity profile] ericmvan.livejournal.com 2010-12-17 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
The Dark Perversities of Michael Powell needs to be the title of something. Seriously.

Sounds like some critic couldn't get Peeping Tom out of his skull even after seven years and, furthermore, hadn't realized that that probably meant the film was actually (at the very least) good.

[identity profile] cucumberseed.livejournal.com 2010-12-17 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
The Dark Perversities of Michael Powell needs to be the title of something. Seriously.

I second this. And I mourn the lack of a copy of that film that I could watch.

[identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com 2010-12-17 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? I saw it in 1987, in the cinema.

It's a good film of the book, very true to the feel of it all the way through, but the end was changed and sucked. The friends I saw it with hated it. But then they made me watch Top Gun, so it evened out.

How come Company of Wolves is a classic and this isn't? I always thought of them as being very similar, they're both slightly surreal films of Carter, too close to horror for me to really be comfortable with them.

Have you seen Brimstone and Treacle? I saw it with the same friends a little earlier and all three of those go together in my mind as disturbing and clever and twisted.