sovay: (Psholtii: in a bad mood)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2010-07-29 11:12 pm

Oh, kid, I do believe that our dreams are wrong

Inception (2010) is an incredibly intelligent film. I loved its play with genres, with film and surrealism, with ghosts, and I loved the one sequence straight out of Cocteau's Orphée (1949).

I am never seeing another film at a Jordan's IMAX.

[identity profile] ap-aelfwine.livejournal.com 2010-07-30 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
Glad you enjoyed the film. I might have to give it a look, myself.

Sounds as if the IMAX experience was bad--I'm sorry to hear of that.
selidor: (delirium)

[personal profile] selidor 2010-07-30 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Ok, that's it, now I'm seeing the film and not waiting until it gets to film club (has decent screen, below-average sound). Thank you!

[identity profile] time-shark.livejournal.com 2010-07-30 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
I love how at its heart it's a straightforward action/heist film, but it's so meta that it, well, doesn't just turn the formula on its head, it makes it do somersaults...

[identity profile] mamishka.livejournal.com 2010-07-30 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
Out of curiosity, which scene is taken from Cocteau? I saw Inception but haven't seen that Cocteau film so now I'm all curious!

[identity profile] ericmvan.livejournal.com 2010-07-30 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Nolan is to film what Gene Wolfe is to the sf novel -- just ferocious intelligence and the mastery of puzzlebox constructions that have philosophical and emotional depth.

It's interesting to see strong chunks of DNA from Memento, The Prestige, and the two Batman movies in this one.

[identity profile] ron-drummond.livejournal.com 2010-08-01 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
I enjoyed it rather thoroughly as well, for many of the reasons you state (though not because of Orphée, which I haven't seen, and now must), but off and on as I watched I asked, Is it profound? Is any of this even remotely profound? And it seemed to me that the one place where perhaps it was, or was trying to be in a way that had an honest chance of success -- the placing of the spinning top in the safe at the center of her being, and the whole storytelling complex intended to support that moment and arising from it -- is also the one place where the film collapses. It really really does not stand up to close analysis. The only aspect of the film that effected me emotionally also happens to be the only part of the film that doesn't work, and since that one moment is the pivot point for the film as a whole, it means the whole film collapses too. I may be wrong about this, but I don't think so; I will need to see the film again to be sure.

[identity profile] ericmvan.livejournal.com 2010-08-02 10:26 am (UTC)(link)
I think the film is profound, but it is mostly about the nature of film narrative, and I think its equation of film narrative to shared lucid dreaming is just plain correct and insightful.

As with every Nolan film, it becomes much more emotional once you understand (or, in this case, think you understand) what is going on. Dom Cobb's plight may be completely not what we think it is, and that adds much poignancy.

It just occurs to me now that there are strong thematic similarities to Engine Summer, but the latter is about the deep purpose of narrative art while this is more about its limitations, about the gap between narrative art and reality and the ultimate insularity of the narrative artist. But it really is ferociously brilliant about that.