sovay: (Rotwang)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2010-06-09 01:22 am

Mad science is decadent and depraved

I can't remember the last time I laughed out loud while reading Monitor on Psychology. There happens to be a reason for this. Fortunately, there is an equally obvious solution: the APA should just publish more articles about planaria:

These results led McConnell to think more seriously about the chemical nature of memory. To test this notion, he needed to find a way to transfer the putative molecules from a trained to an untrained animal. But how? They tried to graft the head of a trained worm onto the tail of a naïve worm—but the head kept falling off.

Next, they tried grinding up trained worms and injecting them into naïve recipients, but that didn't work, either. The hypodermic needles were too big—getting one inside a flatworm was like trying to impale a prune with a javelin—and if, by chance, the needle was positioned well enough to inject the planarian-puree, it either oozed out or caused the worm to explode.


At Tea on Sunday, I got asked if I was a scientist or if I had been trained as one; the answer to both was no, unless you count messing around with slime mold and radio telescopes (not in the same high school project), but I could so go for some Things Man Was Not Meant to Know right now. Unfortunately, I have an early-morning non-mad doctor's appointment, so mostly I think I am going to go to bed.

[identity profile] ron-drummond.livejournal.com 2010-06-09 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems that an essential part of the method is to let experiments fail, to be committed to the whole extent of an experiment's unfolding, even if it's obvious at or near the beginning that it's going to fail. How it fails can be almost as important as how a successful experiment succeeds. Luckily for us (and for the authors of that paper), it also provides much matter for hilarity.

[identity profile] ron-drummond.livejournal.com 2010-06-09 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
telepathic radioactive flatworms that share information by eating one another's brains.

But only certain kinds of information, predominantly tactical and analytical skill sets of a more aggressive nature; in order to share other kinds of information, let's say the intuitive arts, they must regurgitate their own brains and gently share then with those with whom they wish to interlocute. Of course! That's how the mysterious dispatcher of monster zombies in Manhattan restored the zombie's minds, thereby making them ex-zombies before rather than after killing them! But what nefarious revelations did the mysterious monster-killer glean from the restored brains of its victims that then caused her/him/it to flip out and rip apart all the briefly remindful monsters and scatter their corpses across the City's epic (or otherwise overpriced) rooftops? Or was it simply a matter of the mysterious monster-killer itself becoming a zombie by innocently sharing its brains with zombified monsters? Most important of all: What is the ex-secret of the excess ex-zombies? Stay tuned! Greater minds than mine may have the answers!

[identity profile] ron-drummond.livejournal.com 2010-06-10 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
My monologue didn't turn out as funny as I had hoped but hey on the radio the mad tumbling rush of it might actually work a bit better. I dearly wish you had your show and I had mine and we could guest on one another's shows and invite every cool person we know to come talk and do bizarre dream-skits and stuff and play the best obscure music and read the best obscure poetry and prose, that would be fun! Maybe we should get a consortium together to start our own internet radio station, who knows, I haven't the foggiest how to go about it but I bet we know plenty of folks who could help make it fly....