A long march, a long march, and twenty years behind
Look, I don't know Neil Marshall from a poke in the eye with a pilum, but all things being equal, I'd rather see The Eagle of the Ninth. No offense, but General Virilus? Does he have a very great friend in Rome named Biggus Dickus?
(Oh, movies. How is it you can beautifully realize Middle-Earth and still fuck up the Romans on a regular basis?)
(Oh, movies. How is it you can beautifully realize Middle-Earth and still fuck up the Romans on a regular basis?)

no subject
Spartacus is also good, more for the secondary characters than the heroes. The part that I remember best is how they managed to talk about Romans' sex lives without going the "lol they were pedophiles" route, and that's hard to do.
And it's not as cool as the first two, but I liked Gladiator a lot. The gladiatorial games are just about perfect in every respect. It has a Giggling Villain of Utter Evil who is also fairly well-written and clearly-motivated, which doesn't happen often.
no subject
You might enjoy The Fall of the Roman Empire (1964), which was essentially remade as Gladiator. It suffers from starring Stephen Boyd, who despite his good work as Messala opposite Charlton Heston here cannot act his way out of a paper bag, but makes up a lot of ground in Alec Guinness, James Mason, Sophia Loren, and Christopher Plummer, who is great fun to watch as Commodus. I cannot recommend all three hours of the movie equally, but the funeral of Marcus Aurelius is genuinely something from another world.
no subject