Did I come back for all of this? It seems absurd somehow
Earlier tonight in Barnes and Noble, buying a birthday present for my father (Stephen Wilkes, Ellis Island: Ghosts of Freedom), I looked through the first few pages of Ron Hansen's The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. Somewhere there must be a historical figure in whom I took an interest strictly because of nonfiction, but right now I can't think of one. I had imprinted on William Daniels, so I picked up David McCullough; I read Suetonius because of Robert Graves.* Camille Desmoulins, Tanith Lee's The Gods Are Thirsty. Werner Heisenberg, Michael Frayne's Copenhagen. Whatever I know of their historical importance, even if I encountered them first in school, it's still the jolt of story that inspires research on my own time. I don't require that dramatic arc and historical record match up—Peter Shaffer, I'm looking at you.** Mary Renault's The Mask of Apollo may no longer represent an accurate knowledge of fourth-century Athenian theater, but it's still one of the first books I unpack. And every now and then, it goes the other way: I love Swinburne, so Elizabeth Hand won bonus points with me for Mortal Love. I don't know. It isn't that I don't run across enough odd historical figures in my daily life, many of them thanks to
fleurdelis28. But when I read Cicero for the first time, I had rags of Steven Saylor in my head, and it's because of
strange_selkie that I translated three songs by Hirsh Glik.
* And then because I had Derek Jacobi on my radar, I pulled a play called Breaking the Code off a shelf in the Book Rack and discovered more than the computational theories of Alan Turing. It's a self-perpetuating cycle.
** On the other hand, when Cecilia Bartoli released an album of arias by Salieri, did more musicologists buy it, or curious audience members? I can only hope his shade would have been amused.
Just as I copied this entry to post it, it struck me that there are historical figures whom I discovered as themselves and whom I keep an eye out for: actors, writers, usw. So is that another form of discovery through art? Or would I need to have seen Love is the Devil before I bought a print by Francis Bacon in order to count it as the same phenomenon?
* And then because I had Derek Jacobi on my radar, I pulled a play called Breaking the Code off a shelf in the Book Rack and discovered more than the computational theories of Alan Turing. It's a self-perpetuating cycle.
** On the other hand, when Cecilia Bartoli released an album of arias by Salieri, did more musicologists buy it, or curious audience members? I can only hope his shade would have been amused.
Just as I copied this entry to post it, it struck me that there are historical figures whom I discovered as themselves and whom I keep an eye out for: actors, writers, usw. So is that another form of discovery through art? Or would I need to have seen Love is the Devil before I bought a print by Francis Bacon in order to count it as the same phenomenon?

no subject
But seriously. This small personage? Clone. Perhaps you should check around your seat for carelessly strewn eggs.