sovay: (Sovay: David Owen)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2021-07-31 04:44 am

But—will you e'er forget the scent of hawthorn in the sun, or bracken in the wet?

D. K. Broster's The Flight of the Heron (1925) is indeed a more complex novel than The Wounded Name (1922) and almost as damn-the-subtext slashy—it's not difficult to see one as a dry run for the other, although they differ substantially in the ending and I am not getting over the incredibly gay string of classical allusions in the earlier novel any time soon. This one piles on not just the loyalty and the hurt/comfort but the conflicted pursuit of honor between heart and duty in ways that occasionally and unexpectedly gave me flashbacks to some elements of Turn (2014–2017). The latter were not unwelcome, but I don't consider them statistically significant; they may be a side effect of emotionally twisty narratives set between rebellion and empire. Conversely, I am indebted to [personal profile] nineweaving for confirming the lineage between Broster and Rosemary Sutcliff with the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, since after one novel of Broster's I was suspicious, but after two I was willing to buy a hat to eat if Sutcliff hadn't read her. I have found myself saying recently that Broster feels like a bright body in a constellation of writers I was raised on, but it took me until now to see her. I feel like I could end up with a research project on my hands if I'm not careful.

It was strange, it was alarming, to feel, as by this time he did, how strongly their intimacy had progressed in two months of absence and, on his side, of deliberate abstention from communication—like the roots of two trees growing secretly towards each other in darkness.

(Slash goggles continue to be superfluous.)
nineweaving: (Default)

[personal profile] nineweaving 2021-07-31 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Sutcliff on personal heroes:

"My father's was Sir Christopher Cradoc, who went down at Coronel in 1916. My father was his pilot, and would have gone down with him but for a last-minute transfer. Sir Christopher Cradoc wore steel-boned corsets and used scent. He used regularly to arrive on the bridge when my father was bringing the ship into harbour, and say 'Thirty seconds late, Pilot,' to which my father would reply, 'Sir, kindly get off my bridge, you are upsetting my compass.' Years later, when I came to know about such things, I said to my father, 'Was he a homosexual?' My father looked at me with clear surprised eyes, and said, 'No, just Elizabethan, like Drake and Raleigh.'"

"Upsetting my compass"! Indeed.

Nine

nineweaving: (Default)

[personal profile] nineweaving 2021-07-31 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I had no idea she had named Cradoc of The Eagle of the Ninth after a person more recent than the first century CE.

I love how she slips that homage in, invisibly.

Nine
nineweaving: (Default)

[personal profile] nineweaving 2021-07-31 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, interesting. Sutcliff clearly spells him "Cradoc" in her autobiography, but he was "Cradock," and a looker.



The ever-useful ODNB:

"The term 'knightly' was easily applied to this very model of a late Victorian naval officer who never married. Tall, alert, and always immaculately dressed with a neatly trimmed beard, the well-spoken Cradock had a reputation as a fine sportsman and seaman. As commander in the Royal Naval College Britannia in 1895 he reminded the future Admiral Andrew Cunningham of Sir Francis Drake. Cradock also published, notably Sporting Notes in the Far East (1889) followed by Wrinkles in Seamanship (1894). His best-known work was Whispers from the Fleet (1907), a series of anecdotes and maxims providing common-sense advice for young officers that would also be carefully examined by historians after his death for possible explanations of his motives."

Nine
Edited 2021-07-31 19:27 (UTC)
ethelmay: (Default)

[personal profile] ethelmay 2021-08-02 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
From the Wikipedia article: "Cradock never married, but kept a dog which accompanied him at sea." I am side-eying that construction, or rather its underpinning assumptions, pretty hard.