sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2017-11-28 09:25 pm

But still, if they ever catch on fire—which, with any luck, they might

I had a nice day when I was not expecting to. The MBTA had quasi-fallen down, as is honestly its norm these days (and I don't want it privatized, I want it properly funded by the state), but a frequently stressful appointment went well, I had a pleasant conversation with a total stranger over a bagel on my part and a package of muffins on his, and there was a brilliant low sunset flare behind the Citgo sign as I was coming back across the Longfellow Bridge, that winter-red sun that attracts mythological similes. I am reading Derek Jarman's Smiling in Slow Motion (2000).

I don't know what to do about the fact that my favorite overshirt is falling apart. Our sharp-clawed and snuggling cats have contributed a little, but the real problem is that I looked at the label ("M (15–15½) Fieldmaster Made in U.S.A. Perma-Prest 100% Cotton") and then I looked at the internet and this shirt may be older than I am. Fieldmaster is an extinct label of Sears. I find shirts of this style advertised as vintage on eBay. It is a dark slate blue and fits my shoulders perfectly. In really cold weather, I can wear it over a T-shirt and under a sweater and not overheat while walking at my normal pace outdoors. I understand that I am hard on clothes because when I find something I like, I wear it until it wears out, but I really feel I shouldn't be losing this one. The overall cloth and most of the major seams are sturdy. It's never lost any buttons and I can mend buttonholes. The issue is that the cuffs unraveled some time ago and the edge of the placket is going the same way and one of the pockets is tearing out at the corner, which makes no sense to me because I don't keep anything in the breast pockets of my shirts; the collar is also looking a little shabby. There are fraying hems. These are things I have no idea how to fix.

Reading Derek Jarman makes me think about the fact that I was not part of the queer culture of my youth, but the straight culture of my youth was incredibly alienating, and either way I couldn't tell if people were interested in me unless they said so. It's not my first mode of interaction with other people; it is never my first assumption of someone else's motivations with me. I miss a lot of cues. I taught myself to recognize a variety of courtship behaviors over the years, mostly because things went badly if I didn't, but almost all of them are yet another of the alien languages that I have had to learn in order to exist. I think of the way books could be handed like code; maybe that works better for people who don't recommend books all the time, because when the high school friend I thought was not interested in me gave me a copy of Mary Renault's The Persian Boy (1972), I missed the signal. There is no moral here except the one I have already drawn about talking to people. And that I never again agreed to date a person to whom I felt no physical attraction just because we were friends and I thought that was how it worked.

I have just learned courtesy of a friend who is not on Dreamwidth that Noël Coward's "The Stately Homes of England" is a parody. This makes me happier than is probably reasonable.
thistleingrey: (Default)

[personal profile] thistleingrey 2017-11-29 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
Restitching the cuffs and placket seems possible to me--perhaps using a similar color of thread and hand-sewing to reinforce what's there. To mend a fraying hem, I'd either sew a patch atop it or (if the frayed part is small) just hand-sew a bit around it so that the cloth threads don't come any looser than they have. I dunno--hard to guess from a distance, naturally. Visible mending is definitely a thing: one, two, three in order (by my lights) of most to least mindful.
Edited (ugh, sorry, s/v agreement) 2017-11-29 05:56 (UTC)
rosefox: Green books on library shelves. (Default)

[personal profile] rosefox 2017-11-29 07:20 am (UTC)(link)
Cuffs and collars were originally designed to be replaced as they wore out, to keep a shirt alive longer. A good tailor may be able to help. Failing that, a good tailor may be able to copy the shirt.

The pocket is tearing because every wash puts pressure on the seams, and the cloth around the seams.

moon_custafer: neon cat mask (Default)

[personal profile] moon_custafer 2017-11-29 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Now I’m wondering if anyone was trying to signal me; I just thought that book was very popular among the girls in my high school’s History Club.
lauradi7dw: (Default)

[personal profile] lauradi7dw 2017-11-29 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
There is a technique called turning a collar. Ask your hypothetical seamstress/tailor if your collar is a good candidate.
This video shows another, less ideal (in my opinion) way to deal with it, but there are others.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJJxwYmLyi4
much more detailed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOzCr74HFv4
If you can settle for a shirt of the same approximate vintage (early 1970s) but lighter blue color, I have two you could have. One was never worn, as I started to embroider all over it and never finished the embroidery project. If you like the shirt, you could pull out the embroidery. The other was lighter weight, and has a peeling iron-on feminist fist on the back.
poliphilo: (Default)

[personal profile] poliphilo 2017-11-29 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I do so love Noel Coward.
selkie: (Default)

[personal profile] selkie 2017-11-29 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I came to say it might be worth turning the collar if someone can do the dismantling part; I linger to remark that anyone who gives anybody of their same external gender presentation a Mary Renault book is probably interested in that person. Just in my experience.
selkie: (Default)

[personal profile] selkie 2017-11-30 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
They don't make shirts like they used to. I support the tailor plan for the collar but think a patch hand-done on the pocket would be charming.

Everything worked out in the end, and all, but I ought to have chucked The Lovely Young Ladies at your head. Instead, of course, you lent me Good Omens, which was more apropos to the tilt of the universe and the tides of fate. And I didn't crack the spine, either. That's the real reason you still talk to me.
ethelmay: (Default)

[personal profile] ethelmay 2017-11-30 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
I am somehow reminded of the time a same-sex friend in high school gave me a lavender valentine with "goddess, nymph, perfect, divine" (a Shakespearian joke on my name) on it, with absolutely no notion how that might be interpreted. (It was a very nice valentine -- I think I still have it somewhere -- but the memory has always been a bit spoiled by the way the people by the mailbox shrieked, "Ooh, how LEZZY!" when I took it out.)
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-11-30 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I was not part of the queer culture of my youth, but the straight culture of my youth was incredibly alienating, and either way I couldn't tell if people were interested in me unless they said so. It's not my first mode of interaction with other people; it is never my first assumption of someone else's motivations with me. I miss a lot of cues.

Yeah, I sort of got trained out of the idea that anyone could ever be interested in me by constant loud repetitions of how ugly I was, how weird I was (mostly for reading), how anti-social, did they mention ugly (in grade school kids called me "Dog" for years), up through junior high. This resulted not only in me dropping out of high school early on but being absolutely unable to tell in college, surrounded by other bookish and weird people, if any of the other bookish and weird people thought I was at all in any way desirable. (Even then there was also the "you're so smart it's intimidating" thing, which LOL, and also seemed to be mostly guys taken aback by women who spoke audibly in class and felt free to challenge their arguments.) I got accused of flirting with guys my girlfriends were interested in a lot, and also was semi notorious for completely missing any cues that an outing might be a date-shaped activity rather than friends just hanging out.

But then I met my future (and still) husband in a university library where I was working the desk during Spring Break and bored out of my mind, and said re the books he was checking out, "Oh, you like Spinoza? I LOVE Spinoza!" Of course the books were for a class, but since he had never heard anyone else say they loved Spinoza ever, he stuck around to talk and so reading was not absolutely incompatible with desirability after all, apparently. (I still love Spinoza.)

I grew up in the eighties and so it was considered VERY weird I didn't like skirts (unfortunate incidents where male classmates kept flipping them up at recess, which would probably not be tolerated today), dresses, or makeup, which was partly 'what is this patriarchal culture bullshit' (height of the Second Wave), partly 'if you make it so I can't win I'm not going to play your fucking games,' and mostly deep-rooted conviction implanted by peers that nothing would help my repulsiveness, so it would just look silly if I even tried. I have the kind of body dysmorphia where you never know where your elbows/knees are and your face looks strange in the mirror, but maybe not gender dysmorphia per se (AFAIK, 'I am born in the wrong body') as much as being told repeatedly and loudly how much I FAILED at being female in elementary ways. (One reason my agoraphobia got bad was I was sick and tired of people, mostly men, feeling free to comment on my appearance, loudly and nastily, on the sidewalk, in parking lots, in the supermarket, wherever, and even when it didn't happen the voices got internalized so I was always expecting them, or thinking that was what everyone was thinking when they saw me.) That plus a host of mental and physical chronic illnesses from early childhood on up made embodiment seem like a bum rap, especially given the culture's focus on things I was no good at (sports, physical coordination, sociability, attractiveness, how one appears to other people, outward appearances).


tl;dr if there had been anything like a 'queer culture' I would have grabbed at it with both hands, but as it was people just thought I was Even Weirder for listening to VU and glam era David Bowie ("he's wearing MAKEUP?!") and Patti Smith ("does she ever comb her hair?")
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-11-30 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh ghod, "LEZZY" was just The Worst Insult Ever in junior high. Along with "gay." But even just girls hanging out at each others' houses instead of with boys was "LEZZY." And loudly discussed. No privacy or tact anywhere.
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-11-30 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the concept of mandatory Valentine's Day in school paled for me around the third year I got hate mail and people I sent cards to (because you HAD to send them, no way of opting out) ripped them up. I was never very psychologically stable to start with, but being the untouchable in nearly every social group until about age sixteen did not help.
brigdh: (Default)

[personal profile] brigdh 2017-11-30 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I think of the way books could be handed like code; maybe that works better for people who don't recommend books all the time, because when the high school friend I thought was not interested in me gave me a copy of Mary Renault's The Persian Boy (1972), I missed the signal.

Gotta say, I would absolutely miss this signal too. In fact, I think I did read 'The Persian Boy' off a recommendation, though I've forgotten from whom, so if they meant it as a flirtation, it did not succeed.
ethelmay: (Default)

[personal profile] ethelmay 2017-11-30 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
My locker smelled like terrible cheap perfume for a year.

NO. How gross.
kore: (Default)

[personal profile] kore 2017-12-02 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
(blargh, sorry about all the TMOI tl;dr)

It certainly was at that point! It was as enjoyable as it was surprising. And the conversation has continued on for 25+ years.