![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Then I take the train all night
1. I was reminded by ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
samhenderson that while David Tennant actually made a very good Hamlet and I recommend the production as a whole, the character I am still thinking about a week later is Patrick Stewart's Claudius. I'd never seen this particular take on Hamlet's uncle before—a politician-king, unruffled as oil on water and capable of the same chameleon shimmer; in his first scene, he plays the public grief over his brother off the consolation of his royal marriage so effortlessly, we wonder for a moment if we've stepped into Richard III by mistake. There seems to be nothing to him but surfaces. He can't be read by the audience, he gracefully deflects his conscience-catching stepson. He might be any smiling murderer until we reach the confession scene: and then as suddenly as whiplash, we are made to understand that this "bloody, bawdy villain" has a conscience and he is suppressing it by sheer visceral force of will. "It revolts me, but I do it." That was facetious for Pooh-Bah, but for Claudius it's an honest state of mind; it's not even cognitive dissonance. There are things in Denmark he found worth the damnation of his soul and once determined to obtain them, however sickeningly he feels their guilt—my crown, mine own ambition and my queen—he is not going to renege, recant, or turn it all over to Hamlet now. Among other things, this is a Claudius who loves Gertrude. After the murder of Polonius, he soothes her not like a puppetmaster reestablishing control, but like any husband distressed by his wife's pain. (A touch I loved: while she promised to cut off all physical intimacy with Claudius, of course she lets him comfort her. Her son is so hair-trigger and wild-eyed, she'll tell him whatever he needs to hear in order to get him out of her bedroom without killing anyone else; her husband is not the one she mistrusts.) They are easy together. If he fears any heavenly reprisal, it might be Gertrude's discovery of the truth, not Hamlet's revenge for it: when the prince has him finally at sword's point, offering the choice of poison in a cup or on an unbated edge, he looks past his nephew to his dead queen and shrugs extravagantly—for once, showing his theatrics—takes the cup freely and drinks it down. He tries to die with her hand in his. I haven't yet seen Derek Jacobi, but this was quite different from the jovial brute I vaguely remember from Zeffirelli or Kozintsev's cunning tyrant. Stewart may be my definitive interpretation for a while.
2. I think An Infamous Army (1937) is the best novel I've read by Georgette Heyer; I wasn't expecting it to be. Her characterization of Wellington only reinforces my desire for a good biography.
3. Because it contains a new appendix of Pompeiian graffiti, I am now the proud owner of the second edition of Craig Williams' Roman Homosexuality, which cannot be read on the subway—as I discovered on Tuesday—without causing fellow-travelers to studiously refuse to make eye contact with you. It's awesome. I think my favorite new piece of information comes from the second-century grammarian Festus, who illustrated the noun pullus, literally a chick, also an older man's term of endearment for his younger boyfriend, with the story of Q. Fabius Maximus Eburnus, consul in 116 BCE, who was nicknamed pullus Iovis—"Jupiter's chick"—after he was struck by lightning in the ass. But I am also very fond of the glandes Perusinae, lead sling-bullets recovered from Octavian's siege of Perugia (41/40 BCE). They are inscribed with things like salve Octavi felas—Hello, Octavian! You suck. Oh, yes, political discourse is so much less mature and intelligent nowadays.
4. The half-price ticket kiosk in Copley Square came through again, so I was able to see the last night of La Grande-Duchesse de Gérolstein withfleurdelis28 and Shlomo. It was supremely silly and absolutely worth getting up at sleepless o'clock for; it started by satirizing militarism and proceeded to satirize anything that moved, which meant that in place of the third-act ballet it had a can-can with hobbyhorses and it was beautiful. Stephanie Blythe owned the stage from the moment she opened her mouth, which is precisely as the Duchesse should. Frank Kelley turned up in a supporting role as the Duchesse's ubiquitous factotum, running constant interference, announcing and bowing with mathematical precision. I am so glad there is at least one opera company in the world which performs Offenbach that isn't Les contes d'Hoffmann or the "Galop infernal" from Orphée aux enfers.
samhenderson that while David Tennant actually made a very good Hamlet and I recommend the production as a whole, the character I am still thinking about a week later is Patrick Stewart's Claudius. I'd never seen this particular take on Hamlet's uncle before—a politician-king, unruffled as oil on water and capable of the same chameleon shimmer; in his first scene, he plays the public grief over his brother off the consolation of his royal marriage so effortlessly, we wonder for a moment if we've stepped into Richard III by mistake. There seems to be nothing to him but surfaces. He can't be read by the audience, he gracefully deflects his conscience-catching stepson. He might be any smiling murderer until we reach the confession scene: and then as suddenly as whiplash, we are made to understand that this "bloody, bawdy villain" has a conscience and he is suppressing it by sheer visceral force of will. "It revolts me, but I do it." That was facetious for Pooh-Bah, but for Claudius it's an honest state of mind; it's not even cognitive dissonance. There are things in Denmark he found worth the damnation of his soul and once determined to obtain them, however sickeningly he feels their guilt—my crown, mine own ambition and my queen—he is not going to renege, recant, or turn it all over to Hamlet now. Among other things, this is a Claudius who loves Gertrude. After the murder of Polonius, he soothes her not like a puppetmaster reestablishing control, but like any husband distressed by his wife's pain. (A touch I loved: while she promised to cut off all physical intimacy with Claudius, of course she lets him comfort her. Her son is so hair-trigger and wild-eyed, she'll tell him whatever he needs to hear in order to get him out of her bedroom without killing anyone else; her husband is not the one she mistrusts.) They are easy together. If he fears any heavenly reprisal, it might be Gertrude's discovery of the truth, not Hamlet's revenge for it: when the prince has him finally at sword's point, offering the choice of poison in a cup or on an unbated edge, he looks past his nephew to his dead queen and shrugs extravagantly—for once, showing his theatrics—takes the cup freely and drinks it down. He tries to die with her hand in his. I haven't yet seen Derek Jacobi, but this was quite different from the jovial brute I vaguely remember from Zeffirelli or Kozintsev's cunning tyrant. Stewart may be my definitive interpretation for a while.2. I think An Infamous Army (1937) is the best novel I've read by Georgette Heyer; I wasn't expecting it to be. Her characterization of Wellington only reinforces my desire for a good biography.
3. Because it contains a new appendix of Pompeiian graffiti, I am now the proud owner of the second edition of Craig Williams' Roman Homosexuality, which cannot be read on the subway—as I discovered on Tuesday—without causing fellow-travelers to studiously refuse to make eye contact with you. It's awesome. I think my favorite new piece of information comes from the second-century grammarian Festus, who illustrated the noun pullus, literally a chick, also an older man's term of endearment for his younger boyfriend, with the story of Q. Fabius Maximus Eburnus, consul in 116 BCE, who was nicknamed pullus Iovis—"Jupiter's chick"—after he was struck by lightning in the ass. But I am also very fond of the glandes Perusinae, lead sling-bullets recovered from Octavian's siege of Perugia (41/40 BCE). They are inscribed with things like salve Octavi felas—Hello, Octavian! You suck. Oh, yes, political discourse is so much less mature and intelligent nowadays.
4. The half-price ticket kiosk in Copley Square came through again, so I was able to see the last night of La Grande-Duchesse de Gérolstein with
fleurdelis28 and Shlomo. It was supremely silly and absolutely worth getting up at sleepless o'clock for; it started by satirizing militarism and proceeded to satirize anything that moved, which meant that in place of the third-act ballet it had a can-can with hobbyhorses and it was beautiful. Stephanie Blythe owned the stage from the moment she opened her mouth, which is precisely as the Duchesse should. Frank Kelley turned up in a supporting role as the Duchesse's ubiquitous factotum, running constant interference, announcing and bowing with mathematical precision. I am so glad there is at least one opera company in the world which performs Offenbach that isn't Les contes d'Hoffmann or the "Galop infernal" from Orphée aux enfers.
no subject
The Hamlet you're describing, with Patrick Stewart, is it on film? (Sorry if this is a stupid question.... it seems to me like you must have had to have seen it on film, but possibly in a theater?)Found it on Netflix. It's in the queue now with the other Hamlet you recommended, and with Richard III and Henry V.I'm collecting good movies of Shakespeare plays to watch, and I'd love to see that one, if it's available.
without causing fellow-travelers to studiously refuse to make eye contact with you. --I thought they more or less generally tried to avoid eye contact anyway!
Hello, Octavian! You suck. I love it that the same things are consistently insults for thousands of years.
no subject
no subject
follow-up question
If an actor like Patrick Stewart does a dramatic interpretation of a character like Claudius, is that his decision, or is that the director? Or does it vary from case to case? Obviously even if it's the director's decision, it's the actor who carries it off, but I'm curious.
no subject
It always cheers me up when Romans are nasty. I could use some of that cheer this morning, as there are certain things I want to inscribe on sling stones and lob them at certain heads.
no subject
Wait, what?
---L.
no subject
no subject
We were supposed to be getting Hamlet from Netflix, but apparently everybody else wanted it, too, so we got stuck with The Fourth Kind.
Hopefully we'll get to see it on Monday. I was eager to see it as much for Patrick Stewart as Tennant, but you have made me that much more eager to see it, and see it SOON.
no subject
<3
no subject
I kept hoping someone would!
no subject
According to Festus, De verborum significatu (On the Meaning of Words) 245.13—17:
pullus Iovis dicebatur Q. Fabius, cui Eburno cognomen erat propter candorem, quod eius natis fulmine icta erat. antiqui autem puerum, quem quis amabat, pullum eius dicebant.
Q. Fabius, whose cognomen was Eburnus (Ivory) on account of his fairness, was called pullus Iovis because his buttocks had been struck by lightning. The ancients referred to the boy whom someone loved as his pullus.
no subject
I also do curse tablets for a low, low fee.
no subject
I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
(Whose Henry V are you watching?)
I thought they more or less generally tried to avoid eye contact anyway!
They would look over to see what I was reading and then look away. I was honestly assuming that at some point another out-of-work classicist or just a curious passenger would say something (because I would have—I had a great conversation once with someone who was reading Ovid's Metamorphoses in Latin on the Red Line. He turned out to be a Morris dancer), but no one ever did.
no subject
I'd never seen him do Shakespeare before. I had no idea what I was missing.
no subject
Glad to brighten your day. I recommend the entire book very highly.
no subject
I'm not even an amateur actor, but everything I've read indicates ideally it's a collaboration and I do imagine it varies from case to case. I bet it would be possible to find out the proportions in the case of Patrick Stewart's Claudius—there were interviews at the RSC's website, but I couldn't play them because of the region.
In fact, here; two interviews with Patrick Stewart. I am glad to know my reading of the character is more or less correct!
no subject
Yeah.
no subject
Patrick Stewart was astonishing. I'm going to have to find more Shakespeare by him!
no subject
The only people in history as naughty as the Romans were every other people in history.
no subject
Of course he did. This is making me wonder what other unlikely but apt associations/correlations we could think of.
The Henry V will be the one with Kenneth Branagh (sp?)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Thank God!
no subject
no subject
For the most part I'd say people on the NYC subways studiously refuse to make eye contact no matter what one is or isn't reading. It's interesting that the Boston subways would be different, although I'm sorry for their refusal to make eye contact with you.
no subject
Salve! This is brilliant.
no subject
no subject
It makes me so happy.
no subject
Seriously, I couldn't inscribe them on lead for health reasons—one might have to substitute aluminum foil—but I know the formulae. I wrote one for
no subject
(Spelled correctly.) I saw that one in high school, double-featured with Olivier's; I preferred Branagh. Enjoy!