ext_17913 ([identity profile] ap-aelfwine.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sovay 2009-01-23 04:46 am (UTC)

Hmm... to me, the third one was the best. But I suppose the first is the one that needs to be read, if one's only going to read one.

I question whether Rowling should be on the list at all, when The Last Unicorn is not.

This is true. And I'd like to see Hughart's The Bridge of Birds on the list. But I suppose for sheer impact in the wider world Rowling belongs there.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting