But I'm not sure he qualifies as a supporting character in Assassin's Quest (or any of the Fool's Errand trilogy), at the very least. Though I suppose one could argue that the Fool got more important because he was interesting rather than vice versa . . .
If I had to pick a Hobb character who was a supporting character the whole way through I'd go for either Chade, Burrich, or possibly Kettle (whom I liked far more than is probably appropriate) . . .
no subject
But I'm not sure he qualifies as a supporting character in Assassin's Quest (or any of the Fool's Errand trilogy), at the very least. Though I suppose one could argue that the Fool got more important because he was interesting rather than vice versa . . .
If I had to pick a Hobb character who was a supporting character the whole way through I'd go for either Chade, Burrich, or possibly Kettle (whom I liked far more than is probably appropriate) . . .